This and That.

DSC_0040treeeee

First, not one of my best, but to introduce you to ‘my’ tree in the ravine, taken last December.

Obama’s Bamboozling. I’m a fan of Peggy Noonan’s writing in the WSJ, but when I read her column on Obama’s speech I had cognitive dissonance, I couldn’t square what I knew of her writing, insightful, full of common sense, with what I’d read of the speech. It’s probably behind subscription but here is the beginning, you’ll get the idea.

I thought Barack Obama’s speech was strong, thoughtful and important. Rather beautifully, it was a speech to think to, not clap to. It was clear that’s what he wanted, and this is rare.

It seemed to me as honest a speech as one in his position could give within the limits imposed by politics. As such it was a contribution. We’ll see if it was a success. The blowhard guild, proud member since 2000, praised it, and, in the biggest compliment, cable news shows came out of the speech not with jokes or jaded insiderism, but with thought. They started talking, pundits left and right, black and white, about what they’d experienced of race in America. It was kind of wonderful. I thought, Go, America, go, go.

Time to come back to earth with Bruce Thornton who eviscerates [fisk doesn't do justice to it] the speech
A sample:

The next rationalization arises in the last sentence, and employs another trick Obama will use throughout the speech: specious moral equivalence served up with a false analogy. To imply that people attending churches and temples in this country regularly hear the sort of lunatic bigotry Wright preaches, is simply dishonest. I grew up in a rural, fundamentalist church whose members were mostly from the Jim Crow South, and I never once heard in church anything about blacks equivalent to the racism Wright indulges. Later I attended for a while a Congregationalist church — after Unitarians, the most wacky liberal denomination in America — and though I heard much political nonsense, nothing came close to Wright’s bile. Obama is trying to avoid the simple fact that Wright’s comments reflect the worst sort of irrational extremism, rather than, as Obama goes on to whitewash them, a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice, as though Wright’s sin was merely one of excessive zeal in a noble cause.

Tom Stoppard, another of those superb Czech writers has a column in The Times on the student riots of ‘68. Do check it out.

Sphere: Related Content

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 22nd, 2008 at 11:14 pm and is filed under Lig Pics, Obama-debacle, This and That. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “This and That.”

anne March 23rd, 2008 at 9:09 am

Thanks for the Stoppard piece. I really must put the Times and maybe the Telegraph, too, on my daily list. The Daily Mail somehow isn’t the same.

I’m fascinated by Stoppard’s measured tone. Similar to Martin Amis’s when he’s interviewed. They seem like wild radicals in their writing but they’re reasoned, clear-eyed thinkers.

Anyway, again: thanks.

ligneus1 March 23rd, 2008 at 1:57 pm

You’re welcome! If you ever get a chance to see TS’s play Arcadia, don’t miss it. Or get the book which is what I did.

Rons March 24th, 2008 at 1:09 pm

The picture may not be your best but it’s damn good.

I’m a former Peggy Noonan fan. She’s a great writer but sometimes I think she just outsmarts herself. I stopped reading her a while back because of pieces just like this.

ligneus1 March 24th, 2008 at 8:32 pm

Rons. Well thankyou! I shall certainly read her a lot more critically now. The WSJ is pretty good as newspapers go, a lot more responsible than the NYT.

Aurora March 25th, 2008 at 4:53 am

Well that piece by Peggy Noonan is just sickly saccharine. I’ve liked some of her stuff, but I’ll never be interested in anything she has to say from now on. If she’s that much of an Obamaniac, it’s got to color everything she does.

Leave a Reply