James MacMillan on the Liberal/Left.
James MacMillan is a Scottish compser, the link will take you to his web page where, as well as learning about him, you can hear some extracts from his compositions.
He has an article in The Spectator lamenting the take over of the old British Labour Party and the arts and letters scene in Britain by modern cookie-cutter-thinking post modern liberals.
My revulsion is particularly acute in the artistic circles I sometimes find myself in. I regret to say that the most eager acceptance of the new hectoring political puerilities are to be found in The Arts. This has its roots in Romanticism, of course, but a gradual systemisation of radical politics settled in the early 20th century. Think of how, from the 1920s, groups such as Imagists, Vorticists, Futurists, Surrealists, Expressionists habitually declare their commitment to Revolution. Yes, any old revolution would do, but as long as it overturned manners and lifestyles as well as aesthetics and politics.
This has nothing to do with a love of life, a love of the poor or the outsider, but all to do with a love of transgression. It becomes addictive and in the past has led artists as much to the extreme Right as to the far Left. Childish ‘anti-bourgeois’ militancy has no political intelligence or moral fibre. Witness, for example, Harold Pinter’s descent into infantilism every time he mentions the United States, or for that matter decides to write poetry. Rather than being ridiculed for the embarrassing doggerel-merchant he has become, he is lauded to the highest by his fellow-travellers, easily impressed by easy rhetoric and equally determined to maintain their favoured positions in the back-slapping arts establishment.
The legacy of this militancy can be seen nowadays in ‘arts criticism’ and the rise of a secular priesthood whose dogmas we now endure day in, day out. The common purpose of this new cultural élite is to attack the institutions and principles of our shared common life. What passes in Britain for an intelligentsia has appropriated the Arts for their own designs — a recent debate at the South Bank proclaimed ‘All Modern Art Is Left Wing’. No dissent from the party line goes unpunished. What we are seeing here is a cultural regime which adjudicates artists and their work on the basis of how they contribute to the remodelling, indeed the overthrow of society’s core institutions and ethics.
Sound familiar? He sees signs of change though. Could be the multi-culti idiots are finally coming to the end of their road to Borg-dom.
There is a growing backlash against this bullying, hectoring and unthinking dogmatism. More and more artists describe themselves as lapsed lefties or recovering liberals. There is a growing resolve to confront a liberal establishment in the Arts, media and elsewhere, responsible for the systematic trashing of much that has been our common heritage, including authentic socialist values handed down from Keir Hardie and others. As an ex-socialist I have seen the aspirations that motivated past generations of good, ordinary people discarded with a contemptuous, superior sneer. As a Catholic artist I am sick of the smug ignorance, the gross oversimplification and caricature that serves as an understanding of religion, particularly Catholic Christianity, in so much that passes for criticism and analysis. The destruction visited on schools and universities, the degradation of the media, the vulgarisation of culture, the deliberate and planned dismantling of the family — all this is a result of liberalism, not socialism.
Do read the whole thing, it’s unfair to post just parts.
Sphere: Related Content


Thanks for posting this, but I swear to god I am getting confused – he says..
” The destruction visited on schools and universities, the degradation of the media, the vulgarisation of culture, the deliberate and planned dismantling of the family — all this is a result of liberalism, not socialism.”
News to me, but I am a neophyte in all things political. Well, on to read it all and try to get a grasp of it , but, i must say, I do hope there is a backlash. The secular religious police have nothing on the much vilified Christians who are so often falsely accused of stuffing their dogma down all of our throats.
Actual Christianity never seeks to rob a man of his individual choice. They simply state what are the likely consequences for poor choices according to scripture. But the left, they have no love of individual will, except to extinguish it. And the thing is – if Christians are right, you don’t live in hell until you die. Socialists are retrieving hell straight out of the abyss and call it “change”.
When he says socialism he’s talking about the old socialists of the first half of the 20th century who were patriotic, church going, family oriented, decent people. The breed of socialists that came onto the scene in the sixties seduced by the post modern, mostly French philosophers, into embracing political correctness, multi-culturism, pacifism, feminism and all the other weak kneed isms of the time are what he can’t stand. So give him credit for seeing through the likes of Harold Pinter and co, while recognising that he hasn’t quite seen the light and abandoned socialism itself as unworkable and naive at best and insidiously totalitarian at worst.
Thank you Lig, that gives me a better understanding…