More Lipstick on a Pig Courtesy the Carnegie Foundation

The Carnegie Foundation is playing the “Lets Put Lipstick on a Pig” game by financing more Islamic taqiyyah.

The Carnegie Corporation of New York has announced grants totaling $10 million to nonprofits working to enrich the quality of America’s public dialogue on Islam and Muslim societies.

OK. I’m game. Here is an example of typical Muslim “dialogue”. Enrich this:

Al-Qaida stepped up its calls to kill Jews.

Ayman al-Zawahri, the Osama bin Laden lieutenant who last month urged Muslims to strike Jews “everywhere” in revenge for an Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip, issued an even more expansive threat Thursday.

“We promise our Muslim brothers that we will do the best we can to harm Jews in Israel and the world over, with Allah’s help and according to his command,” Zawahri said in an audiotape released online.

The remarks, which were in response to e-mailed questions from al-Qaida supporters and came with an English translation, linked the sought-after fall of Israel to the sought-after failure of the U.S. occupation of Iraq.

“I expect the jihadi influence to spread after the Americans’ exit from Iraq and to move towards Jerusalem,” Zawahri said.

A fugitive from the regime of Hosni Mubarak, Zawahri predicted the demise of the pro-Western governments in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. But he had especially hostile words for the United Nations, calling it an “enemy of Islam” for its vote on creating the State of Israel in 1948.(Source)

CAIR and like organizations administer their taqiyyah to the simple folks, those who, for the sake of brevity, can be described as having the intellectual and moral depth of a typical Oprah audience. They are the somnolent thousands who brightly shake hands and grin ear to ear at CAIR’s ubiquitous “outreach” functions, typically held in benign Christian churches.

The muslim guest speaker is American to a ‘T’, his wife presenting a soft and elegantly veiled visage, bright and shining children at their side. A few sad tales are told of “malicious hate crimes”, a plea for understanding ensues, and your typical American audience feels warm and cozy and congratulates themselves on how worldly they are, how global. Very few bother to question what they have heard.

On the other hand, Carnegie’s target audience are those who have the power to silence the rest of us. To dictate what ends up in textbooks, to facilitate sharia compliant financing, to determine what hate crime legislation is rammed through government, what speech to prosecute,what Hollywood films get produced, and on and on.

Over the past six months, the corporation has worked to integrate a focus on Islam into many of its long-term programs, supporting innovative publicly accessible research by individual scholars; efforts to address Islamic religious and political thought in the media; outreach by universities to connect their research to the public; and efforts to inform specific audiences, including members of Congress, about the complex and rapidly changing landscape of contemporary Islam. (All bold mine)

“…publicly accessible research by individual scholars…”

Would that happen to include any of the following?

Or the myriads of other experts; ex-muslims and ex-terrorists who are consistently excluded from the world stage, a stage monopolized by entities such as Carnegie who use Islam as proxy to silence a growing body of citizens who see exactly what Carnegie wishes to whitewash.


“…efforts to address Islamic religious and political thought in the media…”

Could that possibly mean that the media will quit carrying water for Muslim apologists? Or, as this writer asks:

To be sure, Americans know relatively little about Islam. They also know relatively little about Hinduism, Buddhism and Shintoism and not a few other things besides. Just why is it the special duty of American newspapers to make Americans knowledgeable about Islam? And is it really plausible that newspapers could accomplish this task? (source)

So far all evidence confirms that media worldwide haven’t the spine to confront the ugly truth of Islam. Quite the contrary, they are going out of their way trying to paint the very readers that they presume to educate as spittle flecked haters.

I have been talking with a producer of the NBC Dateline show and he is in the process of filming a piece on anti-Muslim and anti-Arab discrimination in the USA. They are looking for some Muslim male candidates for their show who would be willing to go to non-Muslim gatherings and see if they attract any discriminatory comments or actions while being filmed.

They recently taped two turbaned Sikh men attending a football game in Arizona to see how people would treat them. They set them up with hidden microphones and cameras…

“…outreach by universities to connect their research to the public…”

Perhaps while they are dealing with these universities, Carnegie might want to evaluate the pervasive censorship by the Muslin Student Association and their allies in suppressing any speech that dares to criticize islam. Is the truth that Islam lays claim to, and that billions are expended in defense of, so fragile, so tenuous that no opposing view can be risked?
“…and efforts to inform specific audiences, including members of Congress, about the complex and rapidly changing landscape of contemporary Islam..”
Why would Carnegie bother to address Congress? For the most part, those rats are already owned, either by their cowardice or by an Arab. And it doesn’t take an endowment from Carnegie for someone to take note of the changing landscape” in any nation where there is a preponderance of Muslims. The following is a mere glace at the topography of a world rotted by Islam.

4/6/2008 (Peshawar, Pakistan) - Islamic militants ambush vehicles along a highway, killing at least three locals.

4/6/2008 (Afgoye, Somalia) - A 9-year-old boy is among two people murdered when Islamists stage a shooting attack.

4/6/2008 (Mogadishu, Somalia) - Seven people are shot to death by Muslim radicals in two attacks at a market.

4/5/2008 (Khaneqin, Iraq) - Four oil workers are kidnapped and beheaded. Four other innocents are killed elsewhere by Jihadis.

4/5/2008 (Baghdad, Iraq) - Sunni extremists bomb a bus, killing three people.

4/5/2008 (Sanaa, Yemen) - An al-Qaeda gunmen attacks a checkpoint killing one person. (Source)

And Carnegie could have saved the 50K designated for “…the ADC Research Institute to disseminate information on civil rights and civil liberties violations affecting Arab and Muslim Americans post-September 11, 2001.The documented refutations of Muslim claims of offense and malice are quite freely found online.
CAIR’s Hate Crimes Nonsense

CAIR Pushes Phony Charges of Anti-Muslim Hysteria, Hate Crimes

Lies, Misinformation and CAIR

As Hugh Fitzgerald comments in the Iconoclast piece, these monies perpetuate the

…continued inability to see that Muslims themselves must be forced to consider the possibility that their political, economic, social, moral, and intellectual failures are directly attributable to Islam itself…

Sphere: Related Content

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 8th, 2008 at 2:27 am and is filed under Dhimmi Alerts, Islamofascists, Muslims / Islam, War With Islam. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “More Lipstick on a Pig Courtesy the Carnegie Foundation”

john brinkmeyer April 9th, 2008 at 10:23 am

Interesting bit of reverse propaganda you’re putting out here by your use of a medieval Shi’a Muslim concept - taqiyya - to engage in what is certainly an Israeli practice of twisting the truth in a more congenial way. Its called hasbara, but I’m sure you understand that as this is your clear purpose - meaning - you aren’t interested in the truth. You’re interested in twisting the truth to your own purposes:

(from the hasbara website)

REPORTING AND CREATING THE MESSAGE

Media pundits try to convince the reader or viewer they only report the message and deny they have any part in creating it when, in fact, they do both, wittingly or unwittingly. The way media selects news and opinion items and the weight they ascribe to various facets of stories they publish can sway the message. At the Israel Hasbara Committee we proudly do both. We generate many unique and original ideas, thoughts and commentaries, so as to get a very clear message out: Israel is in need of your support.

zee April 9th, 2008 at 6:11 pm

john brinkmeyer

While hasbara literally means “explanation”, its exact import in its current usage is debated. Gideon Meir has said that there is no “real, precise” translation of the word hasbara to English or any other language, and has characterized it as public diplomacy,[3] an action undertaken by all governments around the world with the growing importance of what Harvard professor Joseph Nye termed soft power. Gary Rosenblatt describes it as “advocacy”.[4] Nathan Guttman has characterized hasbara as “pro-Israel propaganda,”[5] while Avi Hyman has said “while propaganda strives to highlight the positive aspects of one side of a conflict, hasbara seeks to explain actions, whether or not they are justified.”[1]
(source)

Taqiyya is defined literally as:

“Concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies at a time of eminent danger, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury.”

In essence, taqiyya can be generally defined as the legitimization of deception in times of danger.

Taqiyya is alluded to in the following Quranic verse:

“Let not the believers take for friends or helpers unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, (they) shall have no relation left with Allah except by way of precaution (”tat-taqooh”), that ye may guard yourselves (”tooqatan”) from them…” [3:28]”

In his book, al-Durr al-Manthoor Fi al-Tafsir al-Ma’athor, Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti conveys these words by one of Sunni Islam’s most respected voices, Ibn Abbas:

“al-Taqiyya is with the tongue only; he who has been coerced into saying that which angers Allah (SWT), and his heart is comfortable (i.e., his true faith has not been shaken), then (saying that which he has been coerced to say) will not harm him (at all); (because) al-Taqiyya is with the tongue only, (not the heart).”
(Source)

Do I really have to explain the difference? You quote a paragraph from one such “hasbara” site and that is supposed to somehow discredit the points made in the post. I do not have to cherry pick through Islam to demonstrate the perversity of the creed.

Muslims demonstrate the depravity of their “faith” everyday and the propaganda Carnegie hopes to use to deflect and deceive will only be effective on, well, dhimmis like you.

Leave a Reply