An American Horror Story.
To be fair this is the American chapter of a world wide horror story, viz. the treatment of mental illness for the past century or so. It does show the danger in relying on the ‘experts’ and this applies to many other enterprises but particularly the lefty politicians who arrogantly think they know better than the people what they need and how it should be provided.
From ‘The Brain: A Mindless Obsession by Charles Barber’ in The Wilson Quarterly. It’s a long article but worth reading and keeping if only as a warning.
All of the evidence points to the conclusion that today’s full embrace of biological psychiatry is terribly premature, especially since we have available an increasing number of nondrug therapies of proven effectiveness. We are only in the very early stages of understanding how the brain works and what alters its functioning. Somewhere along the way we seem to have misplaced the notion that, at this stage of our scientific evolution at least, the brain’s capacity to understand itself is minimal. The task is endlessly daunting. There are, for example, more than 100 billion neurons in the human brain. Each neuron is connected to hundreds of thousands of other neurons, and each can fire electrical and neurochemical messages hundreds of times a second to other neurons across synapses. Altogether, there are 100 trillion synapses through which these signals flow. All of this activity happens within the confines of a three-to-four-pound object. And the brain is not even mainly composed of neurons. Ninety percent of the cells in the brain are not neurons but glial cells, which provide nutrition and protection to the neurons.
The brain is the most complicated object in the universe. Nobel Prize–winning psychiatrist Eric Kandel has written, “In fact, we are only beginning to understand the simplest mental functions in biological terms; we are far from having a realistic neurobiology of clinical syndromes.” Neuroscientist Torsten Wiesel, another Nobelist, scoffed at the hubris of calling the 1990s “The Decade of the Brain.” “We need at least a century, maybe even a millennium,” he said, to comprehend the brain.
This is what they mess with with their drugs. Though not as barbaric as some of the earlier treatments, the harm it might do is as unknown. Richard Feynman the physicist when asked in an interview if he’d ever done drugs replied, ‘My brain is my most treasured possession, I wouldn’t want to risk any damage to it, so no I haven’t’. By the way, if you’ve never read the two autobiographical books of Richard Feynman, Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman and What Do You Care What Other People Think, then get them right away, great sadness and great humor lie therein.
While on the subject of mental well being, this article in The Telegraph on Happiness and Wealth is worth a read.
Sphere: Related ContentTo mention satisfaction and achievement is to suggest activity of some kind – doing and making, helping, learning, changing – which might seem obvious to most, but is chosen by surprisingly few.
Ruskin tellingly remarked ”a man wrapped up in himself makes a very small parcel”, and this, alas, characterises too many people. The limited surface area of such parcels does not attract much of the golden dust of satisfaction.


That is indeed an interesting article. I have no great love of any practitioners in the field. Suffice to say, the damage they can inflict is crippling and costly.
To assent to the therapy offered, is to, in essence, acquiesce to their version of reality and to allow that to become the lens through which you have agreed to interpret the world. You can be trapped in such a false construct for years if nothing shattering occurs to force one to jump out of the story.
Fortunately, I quit seeing those witch doctors just around the time they started getting Prozac crazy. Back in the day, they were quite content to simply to vitiate my soul, they hadn’t yet advanced to rearranging my neural network.
But, what your article describes…
….would I be correct in seeing this a Marxian view of the human being. It is totally materialistic and, according to their preferred wisdom, it posits that human as imminently “fixable”. The engineered man; fancy high tech zombies stripped of volition, populating a world where Huxley’s soma would fit right in.
Good post, thank you.