The Prisoner Exchange.
I find I can’t criticise Israel for freeing a child murderer and others in exchange for the bodies of the two soldiers captured south of Lebanon. They have their reasons for doing so, of which giving their soldiers the knowledge that they would not be abandoned even in death is maybe the deepest and most human of them. But it bothers me for the message it sends to their enemies, that they can bargain for the release of the most heinous of the terrorists even with captives no longer alive. It gives them a great incentive to kidnap more Israelis, not necessarily military personnel, and they have no need to even bother keeping them alive. These consequences one might think would outweigh the deep emotional need to look after their own and so I admire immensely that in spite of that they do what they think they ought.
Jeff Emanuel takes a more serious look at the problem of releasing prisoners like these and the Gitmo inmates, taking in as he does how the NYT has been getting it wrong for ever.
Sphere: Related Content


Ligneus, I read this the other day (thought I’d commented then) and your first sentence here has been drifting around in my head. No I can’t condemn their decision either. Israel is such a just society which always tries to do what’s right. I do agree with you, however, that they are going to need to look at a change of policy. The lowlifes who are always after them to torture and destroy and wipe every last one of them out will never stop and especially in the face of Israel being seen as weak, which is how these people interpret the lack of a dynamic, swift reprisal.