Adventures in Kenya: The Clumsy Arrogance of Barack Hussein Obama
I have over three hundred links covering Barack Obama’s Kenyan adventures and kinfolk. It’s a tangled weave of info, if for no other reason than that one must have some sort of grasp of the region’s tribal wars, which is what Kenyan elections seem to be rooted in. Obama’s cousin Raila Odinga is of the same Luo tribe Obama’s roots are in, and I imagine this 2006 missive to Obama (quoted below) from the Kenyan government may well have been written by a member of a tribe hostile to the Luos, or at least hostile to Raila Obinga.
Though I do not know to what extent, Jerome Corsi’s new book, The Obama Nation, does go into Obama’s relationship to Raila Odinga..
But Kenyan politics is not the focus of this post. I’m confident Corsi’s book has research and documentation beyond any I can match. (Though I will say, many of us bloggers have been writing about Obama’s Kenyan ties for awhile.) No, the focus in this post is on Obama’s imperious swagger, his bumbling arrogance, his casual deceits, his silver tongued manipulation and his readily dispensed disrespect. All present during his Kenyan trip in support of cousin Odinga and all qualities that Obama has delivered during this presidential contest, and will continue to deliver should he ever ascend to his coveted presidential throne.
The only “change” Obama brings to the political table is his black skin. Beyond that, he is simply another puffed up little man dressed up in ill fitting senatorial robes, grabbing for a crown – and as a favorite commenter has expressed it, he is a common politician “lost in the fragrance of [his] own virtue.” What should damn well be evident by now is he is most emphatically not a uniter.
Dr. Alfred N. Mutua
Public Communication Secretary &
Government SpokespersonResponse To American Senator Barack Obama’s Poorly Informed comments about terrorism, wanted genocide criminals and governance in Kenya:
Senator Barack Obama indicated that he was visiting Africa to help nurture relations between the continent and the United States. His mission, therefore, was warmly welcomed by the Government and the people of Kenya. The fact that he has roots in Kenya endeared him to the people of this country.
However, during his public address at the University of Nairobi, Senator Obama made extremely disturbing statements on issues which it is clear, he was very poorly informed, and on which he chose to lecture the Government and the people of Kenya on how to manage our country.
We would like to make the following facts clear:
a) Kenya is no less vulnerable to terrorism than the United States or any other country. Kenya has in the past suffered incidents of terrorism because of our friendship with the United States and not because as a people, we are less efficient in the management of our security. Indeed, his own country and other countries with higher levels of development, have had more incidences of terrorism despite their sophisticated security systems. Therefore, blaming terrorist attacks in Kenya on possible corruption is highly misplaced and insincere. Using his logic, then, it follows that the terrorist attacks in the United States and other countries are as a result of corrupt border and customs police in his own country and other countries which have experienced incidents of terrorism.
b) The allegation that wanted Rwandese genocide fugitive Felicen Kabuga may have purchased safe haven in Kenya is an insult to the people of this country and negates the fact that Kenya, Rwanda and the United Nations have an excellent track record in collaboration in the search and apprehending of Rwandese suspects. This country has turned over to the United Nations Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda the highest number of genocidal suspects for trial. For that reason also, this country cannot be a safe haven for any genocide suspect and especially Kabuga. If it was an issue of corruption money, as Senator Obama states, then the bounty of US$5 million (Kshs 365 million) being offered by the United States for the apprehension of Kabuga, would be irresistible to the alleged corrupt police. If anybody knows where Kabuga is, this Government would like to know so that we can apprehend him immediately and hand him over to the tribunal.
c) Senator Obama enjoyed the vibrant freedom of expression and wide democratic space existing in this country, during his tour. Instead of acknowledging this big leap in this country, he chose to dwell on none issues as far as the governance of this country is concerned. He ignored the fact that strengthening of democracy and institutions of Governance has been the strongest thrust of this Government. Today, every Kenyan can openly talk about and address issues of corruption without fear and associate himself or herself to any political party he or she chooses. Bold decisions have made to bring down the rate of corruption with great success. For example, the success in our fighting corruption is evidenced by the fact that Kenya is one of the best performing countries in Africa in the collection of public revenue and the economy has had a turn-around from near zero percent (0%), three years ago, to about six percent (6%) economic growth today. This cannot be achieved in a country, which Senator Obama says, is experiencing a “corruption crisis.”
d) Senator Obama also trivialized the harmony and peaceful co-existence that exists between different ethnic groups and races that live in this country, and chose to magnify tribalism as a major problem in this country.
During Senator Obama’s visit, the Government spared no effort in making his stay and travel all over the country enjoyable and fulfilling. Senator Barack Obama is welcome to come again to learn more about the country, the Government and the people of this country.
Reproduced in full from the website of the Republic of Kenya/Office of Communications via Barack Obama Impeachment
[Ed: emphasis mine]


I am moved to comment on the unrelenting attempts to disparage Obama’s candidacy on the basis of his kinship. In your article, you suggest that he has kinship ties with the wrong people in Kenya and this should have significance for his suitability for office.
You rightly point out that one needs a grasp of the local Kenyan ethnic politics to be able to make sense of nuances of relationships, their significance (cultural, political or transnational).
In your own case, you betray a lack of this understanding by suggesting that Kenya’s Prime Minister, Raila Odinga, Barack Obama’s cousin. Nothing could be further from the truth. The character of kinship in Kenya (Luo Kenya, for that matter), and I believe in the whole of Africa, is so complex and nuanced for a person from outside the cultural community to understand. Some kinship ties are culturally contrived and are symbolic for this reason. Others are based on what western thinking describes as the African extended family system. None of these factors can be stretched to create a kinship relationship between Raila Odinga and Barack Obama, the US presidential hopeful.
Luo genealogists described the history of kinship along clan lines. These socio-cultural boundary demarcations determined customs and rules of marriage, characterized occupations, strengths, weaknesses between community and shaped relations between different clans. Raila’s mother came from Alego, a large super clan with several different sub-clans. She married the late Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, popularly regarded as the father of opposition politics in Kenya and a prime mover for political liberation movement in Kenya. He was from the Sakwa clan, geographically contiguous with the Alego clan. Obama’s father, Barack Obama, was born to Hussein Onyango Obama, from Alego Kogelo clan. This gives Raila’s mother and Obama senior’s father a common clan heritage. Clans are larger entities that do not necessarily imply blood relationships between members. Alego, the clan in question, has over 30 different subclans that, incidentally, inter-marry. This means that not everyone from Alego have blood relations.
It may, in politics, be mutually advantageous to flaunt imaginary relationships for gain. US politicians, I imagine, do this too. Kenyan politicians are not averse to this kind of indulgence either.
In all considerations, it is wrong to use an inaccuracy, a fabrication, to disparage or demonize Obama’s or anyone else’s political or social standing. As president, an individual’s performance will not be judged or determined on the basis of his/her ethnic DNA, pedigree or kinship. Instead, it will be determined and judged on the basis of fidelity to the constitutional purpose of his office, versatility and good judgement. Americans should decide on their president based on eligibility, electability, leadership qualities, vision and ability to deliver. The US, after all, has the constitutional and political resources to ensure that foreign DNA does not compromise the intergrity of the union.
His candidacy can easily and accurately be disparaged on any number of grounds outside of his African relatives. However, kinship does indeed become a factor in Obama’s case because his Kenyan relations – none of whom he has denied as being kin – are a mixture of muslims, marxists and socialists.(And that not based on any chain emails or blogger speculations but on verifiable accounts rendered either by Obama, news accounts, and by those who purport to speak for him.)
That may not give you pause, but it certainly is alarming to the majority of Americans when one understands that his mentors and associations in ensuing years are composed of the same matrix of leftists and anarchists – starting with his mother all the way down the line to his pastor – all of it congruent with his ambition to turn America into some third world nanny state. Were he simply burdened with a few off key relatives that bore no relation to his belief system, as were Carter and Clinton, it would be irrelevant. In his case, it is a part and parcel of how he has defined himself..
Cousin or not, what is relevant is that Obama made a point of lending his support to Odinga’s campaign (as verified in interviews, videos and various news transcripts), much to the disgruntlement of the Kenyan government, as evidenced in the linked material in the post. His association with Odinga is no more acceptable, in my mind, than Bush’s ongoing relationship with the Sauds.
Nothing in the post is inaccurate or a fabrication.
The point of the post, which you apparently missed, is Obama’s alarming arrogance and crude maneuvering
in Kenya, mirroring his behavior and demeanor during his recent world tour where the same overblown ego was on display, foreshadowing what an obama presidency will bring.
Yeah, that might be news to Obama who is getting a lot of mileage out of his DNA and ethnicity regardless of his protests to the contrary.
If indeed Americans would vote soberly, based on that criteria, Obama would never step a foot in the Oval office. I damn well intend to do my small part to see that he never does.