Eurabia

EURABIA – A Chilling Look at Europe under Islam
via Bare Naked Islam




Do you really want Barack Hussein Obama charting America’s future?

Sphere: Related Content

11 Comments

  1. Nicolas Krebs
    Sep 4, 2008

    There is nothing such Eurabia except in the mind of some conspiracy theorists.

  2. zee
    Sep 4, 2008

    gee, that is convincing Nicolas. Such a thorough and well documented refutation. I am so impressed.

  3. Nicolas Krebs
    Sep 5, 2008

    “hat is convincing Nicolas. Such a thorough and well documented refutation. I am so impressed.”

    Thank you very much. I guess you already know that there were only 5% Muslims in European Union in 2004 according to Daniel Pipes, that there were only 6% Muslims in Netherlands in 2007 according to Geert Wilders, that Oriana Fallaci assumption of Muslims breeding like rats is unbelievable, that Mark Steyn, Bruce Bawer and Robert Spencer are uneducated in demographic matters, and that Bat Ye’or re-use antisemite conspiracy theory.

  4. zee
    Sep 5, 2008

    Actually Daniel Pipes said this:

    Some 5% of the E.U., or nearly 20 million persons, presently identify themselves as Muslims; should current trends continue, that number will reach 10% by 2020. If non-Muslims flee the new Islamic order, as seems likely, the continent could be majority-Muslim within decades.

    When that happens, grand cathedrals will appear as vestiges of a prior civilization — at least until a Saudi style regime transforms them into mosques or a Taliban-like regime blows them up. The great national cultures — Italian, French, English, and others — will likely wither, replaced by a new transnational Muslim identity that merges North African, Turkish, subcontinental, and other elements.

    This prediction is hardly new. In 1968, the British politician Enoch Powell gave his famed “rivers of blood” speech in which he warned that in allowing excessive immigration, the United Kingdom was “heaping up its own funeral pyre.” (Those words stalled a hitherto promising career.) In 1973, the French writer Jean Raspail published Camp of the Saints, a novel that portrays Europe falling to massive, uncontrolled immigration from the Indian subcontinent. The peaceable transformation of a region from one major civilization to another, now under way, has no precedent in human history, making it easy to ignore such voices.
    Muslim Europe

    There are some reports that contradict claims of muslim growth, but those are in the minority. Some reports, such as those disseminated by CAIR exaggerate it.
    It matters little. The combination of the deleterious effects of multiculturalism and secularism have given muslims in Europe a power disproportionate to their present population. The same factors serve to give the homosexuals in America political and media power disproportionate to their numbers. In both cases, it is the tail wagging the dog.
    It would matter little if muslims grew like weeds if they assimilated and kept their nasty sharia law to themselves. But their cultural chauvinism aided by politically correct dhimmis pose a severe threat that must be recognized and countered.

    For your edification:

    The West’s Islamist Infiltrators

    The World of Islam Map Set

    How many Muslims are there really in the U.S.

    The Bloody Borders Project

    Amsterdam’s Muslim immigrants, who today make up a third of the city’s population, are projected to become a majority by 2020, according to a recent Dutch government report.

    You may draw your own conclusions from that, but one thing is certain: Those of you whose parents were cool enough to bring the family to Amsterdam saw a place vastly different from the one your children will.

    Ditto for the rest of Western Europe, where hijabs and burqas are increasingly visible on the streets of France (9 percent Muslim), Denmark (5 percent), Belgium (4 percent), Sweden (4 percent), Germany (4 percent), Austria (4 percent), Switzerland (4 percent), the United Kingdom (3 percent), Spain (2 percent), Italy (2 percent), Norway (2 percent) and Greece (2 percent).

    An average woman in the Muslim world is the mother of more than 4 children on average, well more than twice than the European level. This sums up into an annual population increase in the Middle East of around 2%.

    In the midst of the Europe’s victorious 19th century the population growth rate was not more than 1.5%. One has to remember that such lower European growth did enabled the colonization of most of the America and Australia and the creation of quasi European states such as USA, Australia, Canada that actually dominate the world scene today.

    In 1960 the percentage of Muslims worldwide was around 13% while in 2001 it reached just above 20%. If the trends continue — all thing equal — in 2050 around 35% of world?s population will be Muslim, by far the largest percentage in Islam’s history.

    Muslim Population Growth Rate in India

    Jaidharma’s blog is being reproduced here to give maximum exposure to the dangers of Islamic population explosion in India. Muslim breeding coupled with their hobby to decimate non Muslims, will pave the way for the extermination of Hindus in India as well. Also read Indian Census and Muslim population growth

    In broad terms, the Muslim population in India has been growing in geometrical progression vis-à-vis Hindus who have been growing in arithmetical progression. And with the improvement of educational and economic level of the Hindus, the disparity has become even more pronounced. To put it in broader perspective, Muslim population has steadily grown from 13% in 1800 to 16% in 1850 to 20% in 1900 to 25% in 1947 and anywhere between 30 to 33% today taking into account the geographical area of pre-partitioned India. These statistics are available from various sources.

    The high rate of Muslim population is not unique to India alone. Barring the isolated case of Indonesia, Muslim population growth outpaces almost every other group in just about any country in the world.

    Almost ten years ago, I had analyzed the 1961 and 1991 census. The growth disparity even in the two were almost identical to one between the 1991 and 2001. Between 1961 and 1991 Muslim population had grown by 133.66% as compared to Hindu growth of 89.24% — the Muslim population growth being 150% of the Hindu population growth.

    Not since September 8, 1683, when the Ottomans were threatening to breach the walls of Vienna, has Islam been so perilously close to seizing control over Western Europe.

    The implications of all this are far graver than we can even begin to imagine, and it is not just a matter of choosing new and more hospitable tourist destinations.

    An increasingly Islamified Europe will prove ever more hostile to Israel and America, and this trend will only intensify as the Muslim population there continues to grow.

    Even if European governments succeed in reversing the curve, which seems highly unlikely, it will be decades before it would begin to be felt. In the meantime, however, Muslim political power on the continent will develop and expand, and European leade

    This political ascendance threatens to exacerbate existing strains within the trans-Atlantic relationship. The presence of nearly 10 million Muslims versus only 700,000 Jews in France and Germany alone helps explain why continental Europe might look at the Middle East from a different angle than does the United States. Indeed, French and German concerns about a unilateral U.S. attack on Iraq or Washington?s blind support for Israel are at least partly related to nervousness about the Muslim street at home

    I was recently asked which cities in Europe have the highest Muslim percentage. The following is what I found in my research.

    I linked to my sources, but note that not all sources have the same reliability level. STAT – official municipal or national statistics, EUMAP – EU Research program, WIKI – collected by Wikipedia, NEWS – mentioned in the news.


    Fresno State Classicist Bruce Thornton argues that the spike
    in Muslim immigration to Europe and their high rate of birth compared to that of native Europeans will cause a seismic demographic shift, threatening the stability of western culture.

    A leading specialist on ethnic minorities in the Russian Federation says within the next several decades Russia will become a country with a Muslim majority. Paul Goble, a university professor and senior research associate currently based in Estonia, spoke Tuesday at the Washington headquarters of Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty.

    For 25 years Paul Goble worked for the U.S. government as an expert on minorities in the former Soviet Union.

    He has been closely tracking what he describes as a huge demographic shift in Russia, a shift he says will have a major impact on the nation’s relations with western countries.

  5. Nicolas Krebs
    Sep 6, 2008

    “Actually Daniel Pipes said this”

    Yes. He wrote in 2004 that there were 20 million Muslims in European Union. Since there were 16 million in 2007, that is a decrease of 20% in 3 years, which mean…

    “There are some reports that contradict claims of muslim growth, but those are in the minority. ”

    I did not say that number of Muslims in Europe will not grow in the next decades.

    “The combination of the deleterious effects of multiculturalism and secularism have given muslims in Europe a power disproportionate to their present population.”

    Have you Evidence, measurement or estimate of this power?

    “For your edification”

    Thank you.

  6. zee
    Sep 7, 2008

    Oh please, the evidence is overwhelming. Your inability to see the threat is on you.
    Netherlands, Great Britain, India, Philippines, Australia, Canada – any regular perusal of news from those countries makes it quite clear.
    I have thousands of such articles cached. Not that it does any good with your sort, here are a mere few –


    • The other day I got an email from a British reader passing on a low-key press release announcing that the Department of Work and Pensions had ruled that polygamous men were entitle to receive spousal welfare benefits for each of their wives. My correspond


    • A Muslim woman replies to the Archdhimmi of Canterbury. “Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: What he wishes on us is an abomination,” from the Independent (thanks to all who sent this in): What Rowan Williams wishes upon us is an abomination and I write here as a


    • there as nothing about Islam that demands respect or recognition – separation of church and state is essential if they allow mongrel “religions” like islam in the tent. dear muslims – take your sharia law and shove it up your collective asses -


      • Sharia does not “demand” domination; it assumes it
      • ut he cannot bring himself to say, which he knows to be true, that all the Muslim schools of law agree that the punishment for abandoning the Muslim religion is death. Some people, even in this country, live in hiding because they fear this.
      • Yet there is a dreadful sense of unreality about the assertion, made both by Mr Sarkozy and by Dr Williams, that whatever applies to Christianity and to Judaism in the West can be applied, just like that, to Islam.
      • The president claimed that the French republic’s obsession with secularism had underestimated the importance of spiritual aspiration. He wants the “blossoming” of religions. In a speech in Saudi Arabia last month, Mr Sarkozy said religion was essential to civilisation.

        That is what Archbishop Williams thinks, too. In their speeches, both men explicitly criticise the more extreme consequences of the European Enlightenment, by which, as in revolutionary France or the Soviet Union, “rational equality” was brutally imposed and religious belief was equated with darkness. Both plead for a deeper understanding of how religion cherishes human dignity, and therefore helps society.

      • At which point, enter Islam. President Sarkozy criticises the French state for maintaining Muslim congregations “under a form of tutelage” and refusing to recognise their cultural and social value. He boasts of how he has set up the French Council of the Muslim Religion, how he wants more mosques.
    • The man doesn’t even have the courage of his lack of convictions. Far from defending what he actually said about sharia law, the Archbishop of Canterbury is fighting to save his job by frantically back-tracking and claiming he has been misunderstood. It w



    • The most striking aspect of the response to his article, however, has not been that bigoted and offensive reaction from a small number: it has been the almost complete silence from the Government on the issues he raised. Despite recent claims by ministers


      • The most striking aspect of the response to his article, however, has not been that bigoted and offensive reaction from a small number: it has been the almost complete silence from the Government on the issues he raised. Despite recent claims by ministers that they want to revise the policy of multiculturalism, and that they wish for a vigorous national debate on what should replace it, their reaction to this – and indeed to all other attempts to generate debate – has been deafening silence. You could be forgiven for thinking there is a conspiracy to prevent discussion of the issues that the bishop, and millions of other Britons, are so concerned about.
    • Not long ago, my colleague at the New English Review observed a young Muslim woman on the London Underground: She was wearing tight dark trousers, a trendy silver plaited belt slung about her hips, a parka with luxuriant fake fur trim pulled up over


      • Perhaps you should have mentioned that the deadly convergeance of the “gangsta” culture with Islamists just might be due to the mass abandonment of orthodox Christianity in England, not only by its heirs but by its very leaders, especially in the Anglican church. One your own British prophets said it thus:

        “If God is dead, then somebody will have to take his place. It will be megalomania or rotomania, the drive for power or the drive for pleasure, the lenched fist or the phallus, Hitler or hugh hefner.” -Malcolm Muggeridge

        But even he would not have imagined that it would mutate into both!

      • Islam has no improving or inhibiting effect upon the behavior of my city’s young Muslim men, who, in astonishing numbers, have taken to heroin, a habit almost unknown among their Sikh and Hindu contemporaries. The young Muslims not only take heroin but deal in it, and have adopted all the criminality attendant on the trade. […]The young Muslims have little defense against the egotistical licentiousness they see about them and that they all too understandably take to be the summum bonum of Western life.
      • Not English, but all too British. And what kind of music is popular with British Muslims? Purcell? Dowland? No, gangsta rap and hip hop, with its mindlessly repetitive rhythms and aggressive, deeply misogynist lyrics:

        • tie to muslim affinity for marxism and athieism – post by dawalker
      • Rejecting Western liberty, democracy, art and free scientific enquiry, Muslims are more than willing to use Western products: mobile phones, DVDs and the internet. Often these technological innovations are used to spread an ideology directly opposed to the civilisation that made innovation possible.

        My colleague’s post here about a Muslim Public Affairs Committee “training course” shows a chilling example of this. The “course” is designed to train Muslims to subvert the West and propagate a seventh century ideology. Yet it is couched in twenty-first century management speak. I have highlighted in bold the jargon which would not look out of place at a management consultants’ training course or a new-agey life coaching session:

      • I have often observed Muslims adopting the least attractive aspects of modern Britain, while spurning its more admirable offerings.

      • My concern for the states, I think, is not just madrassas which are developing, but actually Islamic communities of the type which we have seen develop in the UK.
      • No no. It was very well thought out and fortunately, many had not done work on this. Back in 1979, there was the Islam in Europe conference, and one of their basic strategies that arose was that Muslims should NOT integrate as individuals in society but rather as communities. So they emphasized the development of Muslim communities — in other words, they would become majority in given areas and then they would go to the next stage which was to engage the political bodies in that area. If you had to reduce their strategy over the past 30 years it would firstly the creation of an Islamic consciousness, and all Muslim women would wear the hijab, everyone eats halal meat — those very basic things that gives visibility to the Muslim community. They know “who” they are. And their Sharia, their law, it now becomes operative within. Secondly, to create organizations and institutions. For example, an Islamic Woman’s Society, an Islamic legal society, an Islamic educational society… now, each of those societies sits down and works out it’s principles and sets “what are our objectives”, “where do we want to go”, “how are we going to get there”, “how does Islam fit within this”, and “where does our law come in”. Once they have that in place, they move to the third stage which is to say to their local authority “look, we have lots of Muslim children in school, should not the school cater for our children, in terms of dress, in terms of Ramadan, in terms of food, in terms of education ?” They’d say, politically, we’re here, should we not be present on national days, should we not be a part of everything. So what has happened is they’ve engaged the political structures at local, regional and national levels. Islam has now been accepted and brought into the center. That engaging also had to do with the media, social, cultural, religious bodies all operating in tandem so their presence was known, it was felt. And then there is the final stage which is the threat.

      • Father killed family for being too western

      • Michael Gove
      • Mary Ann Siegart
      • Already Khan has had bricks through her car window for speaking out locally about domestic violence and sexual abuse, issues that are taboo in the Muslim community.
      • “Let us have a stronger voice. Let us start with the real problems and say, ‘Whether you like it or not, this is what we demand’. We could start with all the things that should have been done a long time ago. I would start by ending the teen marriages.“A whole generation of us have been messed up by these arranged marriages. Women like me lived in depression for 30, 40 years. We do not want to be depressed any more. We want to have a strong voice.”
      • Khan’s next priority as prime minister would be to get rid of faith schools and teach Britishness more effectively. Although her children are taught well at an excellent Catholic school, she fears that Muslim schools exacerbate separatism. “Britishness should be compulsory in schools, taught by English teachers. And we should let kids know how valuable their British passports are around the world.”
      • “It hurts me,” she explains. “This was once a nice, mixed area. It hurts me that people are on the streets and women are afraid to walk around. No one is talking to each other, white women on one side, veiled women on the other, walking around. They are ignoring me too. I do not know them and I cannot say hello to them either.”
      • In 21st-century Britain the men in the mosques are saying that polygamy is OK, when it does nothing but increase depression in women. No woman in her right mind can share a man. I defy any woman to say she can.”As a result, the first wives get desperately depressed. “I am not exaggerating this. There is a majority of mothers with depression. Fathers commit polygamy; any child you ask tells you it is an unhappy and sad situation to be in. It is damaging to society. It should not be happening in 21st-century Britain. They need people to stop it happening.”
      • I had too much rubbish fed in me that I would be too Westernised. I was told to keep my distance from you because I am a Muslim. It is still really hard to explain to you how you are conditioned. From a young age those thoughts are put in your head: ‘I am a Muslim. I do not mix with those people’. I would honestly say that we are more racist and more prejudiced than the English.”
      • “They say we’re being victimised. We’re not. The truth is coming out at last, but it’s 20 years too late
      • The Government and the white Establishment have allowed it to happen. And she is outraged about it. “It’s all happening on your doorstep,” she says, “and Britain is still blind to the real threat that is embedded here no

      • Mr Siddiqi predicted that there would be a formal network of Muslim courts within a decade.

        “I was speaking to a police officer who said we no longer have the bobby on the beat who will give somebody a slap on the wrist.

        “So I think there is a case to be made under which the elders sit together and reprimand people, trying to get them to change.”

      • However, the spokesman said cases of domestic violence, including rape, might go to trial regardless of the victim’s wishes.

        Mr Yusuf told the programme he felt more bound by the traditional law of his birth than by the laws of his adopted country. “Us Somalis, wherever we are in the world, we have our own law,” he said. “It’s not sharia, it’s not religious — it’s just a cultural thing.”


      • Three seniormost Muslim officers in UK’s Metropolitan police including Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur, an NRI, are planning drastic action to highlight what they perceived as persistent discrimination in the highest echelons of the force.


      • An initiative challenging Muslim communities living in the West to subordinate their interpretations of Sharia law to the laws of the land has been launched at the European Parliament.

        The Muslim Charter, written by Islamic law expert Sam Solomon and sponsored by Gerald Batten, a British member of the European Parliament, is designed to encourage Muslims to state that they reject extremist interpretations of religious texts that promote or excuse violence and bring Islam into conflict with the modern world.

        Groups purporting to represent Muslims were encouraged to sign the charter to affirm that they reject violence and discrimination against non-Muslims, value the freedoms of the West and want to live as law-abiding citizens.

        The 10-article charter calls on the Muslim community to issue a fatwa prohibiting the use of violence or threats to their followers.

  7. Nicolas Krebs
    Sep 10, 2008

    “Oh please, the evidence is overwhelming.”

    You are welcome to show it to me.

    “Your inability to see the threat is on you.”

    It’s easier to say (I don’t see the evidence because) I don’t want to see, rather that (I don’t see the evidence because) it don’t exist.

    Remember: 3% Muslims in European Union. Three percent!

  8. zee
    Sep 10, 2008

    You really don’t get the phrase “tail wagging the dog” do you? I am not going to repeat the arguments given because you obviously are too dense to comprehend them. Krebs, there is a name for you: DHIMMI.Google it. Now go put your head back in the sand. You’ll never see the axe that will separate it from your neck coming.

  9. Nicolas Krebs
    Sep 11, 2008

    “You really don’t get the phrase”

    Indeed.

    “I am not going to repeat the arguments given”

    I will willingly repeat my arguments if it’s needed.

    “DHIMMI”

    Evidence? Do you acknolegde there is only 3% Muslims in European Union?

    “You’ll never see the axe that will separate it from your neck coming.”

    So when someone disagree with you, you make death threast against him. Brilliant.

  10. zee
    Sep 11, 2008

    So when someone disagree with you, you make death threast against him. Brilliant.

    Oh Krebs, get a life and a brain.I did not threaten you with a damn thing. It is amazing that you deem my reference to their means of dispatching an infidel as a threat, yet do not seem to recognize the threat of islam itself.

    I am obviously alluding to the standard muslim means of eliminating the infidel. Ever hear of the phrase “Death to the infidels”? Ever hear of Daniel Pearl, a man apparently as deluded as you? It is a fate decreed by islam, not by me.

    Fools like you who refuse to see the danger in islam’s steady encroachment in the West will likely meet a very unpleasant fate should Islam finally succeed in destroying the west. Having your head in the sand leaves you ill prepared to defend yourself. Or perhaps you wish to submit. One thing I have been horrified to learn is that too many people find freedom a burden, a responsibility they wish to be rid of. For those folks I suspect Islam isn’t threatening. So be it. Enjoy your servitude.

  11. Nicolas Krebs
    Sep 11, 2008

    “I did not threaten you with a damn thing.”

    Good. Because if you’d try, it would not sucess.

    “Ever hear of the phrase “Death to the infidels”?”

    Yes. So, tell me, who is terrorized between you and me?

    “Enjoy your servitude.”

    Say the guys believing the propaganda of some conspiracy theorists. Funny.

    Remember: 3% Muslims in European Union.

Submit a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

Bad Behavior has blocked 454 access attempts in the last 7 days.

© 2002-2012 Road Sassy All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

Login