(interesting moniker) Set up, you say, yes..at one point I described bush as punting the ball to Obama…they all seek their own gain and can tolerate the stench of each other as they play this horror out….but the thing I feel is horribly missing is a comprehension of what freedom is, it’s fragility and that it may never return.. if these vacuous 47 odd percent who have no problem redistributing wealth realized the enormity of what is being forfeited, politicians might yet again be reduced to the musty, dull public servants they once were…immensely discard-able….

It seems to me the entire problem is that we’ve, in a sense, already been conquered by our Balkanisation. Because of extremes on every side does anyone see the continuance of a ‘representative form’ of government in America’s future?

I don’t, sadly.

I see a strongman in charge. Either a strong liberal ruler or a strong conservative ruler. I use the word ‘ruler’ – but the word isn’t as important as the concept behind the word. The concept behind the President of the United States has been changed, twisted and degraded with this posers anointing of czars and their funding by Congress.

Also, the blurring of the political parties. The Republican party is almost as liberal as the Democrat party of year ago. Communism is an accepted ideology in Washington DC, although the name has been changed to Progressivism. No, America has been set up for failure (IMHO), regardless of the direction she falls.