Last night I spent maybe forty minutes on a post and because it was late and I was tired I clicked on the wrong tab and lost it. Doesn’t that just piss you off no end? So forget that, I did!
I just read an article in Front Page Magazine by Donna Ron, ‘Remembering a Sixties Terrorist‘. It tells of how Bill Ayers treated a young female student and if you can’t get to sleep while angry I suggest you put it by till the morning. And this is another of Obama’s friends. Till he throws him under the bus before the debate tomorrow night.
There is no end to it — everyone gets the version of Obama that perfectly fits his own world view. It is not hypocrisy. It’s fraud. Whatever he told or shared with Ayers, Dohrn, Wright, or Pfleger counts for no more that what he told or shared with other now inconvenient groups and individuals. He’s sold the same piece of political real estate to multiple buyers for multiple, conflicting uses.
But one thing has been consistent. He has never, ever attacked political corruption, whether in Chicago or Washington. To the contrary, at the Woods Fund, the Annenberg Challenge and the U.S. Senate he’s laddled out earmarks and goodies to a long list of friends and associates — Wright, Pfleger, Will County ( home of FBI target Larry Walsh), Allison S. Davis, ACORN, etc. The one consistency has been his fidelity to political supporters. Everyone else and every political position were disposable.
Read it all.
McCain and Sarah are on to something finally attacking Obama on these connections and I bet it’s Sarah who is behind it, Sarahcuda indeed.
The Obama excuses of crying racism, not the —— I knew, I never heard Wright’s sermons [in twenty years of sitting in his pews!], I didn’t know about Ayer’s connection to the Weather Underground are going to start wearing pretty thin, but only if he’s forced to keep repeating them. Go Sarah!!
That one half of America is populated by a people in absolute denial is no surprise to those of us who have been sounding alarms since a group of 19 muslims appeared in the morning skies of 9.11. That we seem to be on the brink of electing a president who has more in common with those Islamists, coupled with a VP who states that corn syrup and coal represent a greater danger - that constitutes a waking nightmare. Yes, you heard me right - corn syrup and coal, as this video will confirm.
While progressives desperately continue to re-frame reality to accomodate their innate cowardice, jihadists continue to plot. And as this site daily affirms, plots become bloody realities.
The excerpt below was taken from Radarsite. Since he published it, he has had several updates which you can find, along with other vital info, at his site. Just scroll. You’ll be provided much food for thought that needs to be digested before you cast your vote for president.
By Douglas J. Hagmann
Northeast Intelligence Network
28 September 2008: Since we published our article concerning terrorist communications naming October 7, 2008, as a potential intended date for a terrorist attack, we have received a record number of e-mails from people across the U.S. asking for additional and more specific information. In an effort to address the questions we have received, it was the consensus of the members of the Northeast Intelligence Network that we supplement our previous report with clarifications and possible additional indicators we have since developed.
Obviously, we are not going to publish our investigatory methods or detail our vetting process, as doing so would be counter-productive. Simply put, the terrorists and their supporters read our site too. We will, however, provide some details that we hope will add some clarity to our methods and the contextual implications of the last few postings.
Perhaps the most important aspect of the article we posted on 24 September 2008 that needs to be understood is that we are not predicting a date for the next attack inside the U.S., nor are we predicting a specific location or even the method of an attack. In fact, we don’t predict anything.
We are simply doing two things. First, we are reporting to our readers what is being communicated on Arabic language message boards used by known Islamic terrorists, their supporters and sympathizers. We only report those findings that have undergone a very strict vetting process conducted by trained investigators, researchers and analysts. Factors we use for that vetting process include but are not limited to the venue in which the communication was published, the “profile” of the author, replies, responses and links to the post, if any, and other factors of a non-disclosable nature.
Secondly, we provide an analysis based on a combination of the results of the vetting process and further analysis using historical data and identified patterns relative to previous attacks (both successful and disrupted) by Islamic terrorists. Since the attacks against the U.S. seven years ago, various forums, message boards, data repositories, uploading sites, and methods of communication have evolved. Numerous sites have come and gone, some have become password protected, while others have been set-up merely as a propaganda tool and are generally devoid of any actual intelligence value. Within this period, however, certain patterns have become evident. These patterns themselves have become an evidenctiary tool, an important piece of intelligence that is quite often overlooked or misunderstood.
Many do not realize that the U.S. has experienced over three dozen attacks or attempted attacks by Islamic terrorists since 9/11, and many more on a global scale. By correlating postings on terrorist forums with the timing of disrupted attacks, and large scale attacks in London and Madrid, for example, certain pre-attack indicators can be discerned. We publish those messages that meet such qualifying criteria for your information and review.
And what is Obama’s position on America’s defenses - the defense of your country, your children and grandchildren? He intends to disarm us.
For additional food for thought, consider this exercise a blogger undertakes in pondering the likelihood that Obama could not even pass a background investigation.
How can the President of the United States be denied a basic security clearance? How can the Commander and Chief of the most powerful military be denied access to classified information? Barack Obama would be denied the necessary security clearance for President if he was held to the same standard as everyone else. If you can’t pass a Secret level background investigation, which is required for many soldiers, you should not be eligible for the Presidency.
[...]
The purpose of the clearance is to determine an individual’s honesty, trustworthiness, reliability, financial responsibility, criminal activity, emotional stability, foreign influences, family associations, drug use, mental health, judicial proceedings, employment history, traits of character, and loyalty to the United States. This collective data is used to evaluate your ability and willingness to safeguard national secrets. Based on the facts about Barack Obama, he fails to satisfy the minimum requirements for even a basic secret clearance. His background investigation would have “Red Flags” shooting up in so many places; the issuing panel would deny him a clearance outright.
The 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team has spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq patrolling in full battle rattle, helping restore essential services and escorting supply convoys.
Now they’re training for the same mission — with a twist — at home.
Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks.
It is not the first time an active-duty unit has been tapped to help at home. In August 2005, for example, when Hurricane Katrina unleashed hell in Mississippi and Louisiana, several active-duty units were pulled from various posts and mobilized to those areas.
But this new mission marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities.
After 1st BCT finishes its dwell-time mission, expectations are that another, as yet unnamed, active-duty brigade will take over and that the mission will be a permanent one.
However, the mission assigned to the nearly 4,000 troops of the First Brigade Combat Team does not consist merely of rescuing victims of terrorist attacks. An article that appeared earlier this month in the Army Times (”Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 1″), a publication that is widely read within the military, paints a different and far more ominous picture.
“They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control,” the paper reports. It quotes the unit’s commander, Col. Robert Cloutier, as saying that the 1st BCT’s soldiers are being trained in the use of “the first ever nonlethal package the Army has fielded.” The weapons, the paper reported, are “designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without killing them.” The equipment includes beanbag bullets, shields and batons and equipment for erecting roadblocks.
It appears that as part of the training for deployment within the US, the soldiers have been ordered to test some of this non-lethal equipment on each other.
“I was the first guy in the brigade to get Tasered,” Cloutier told the Army Times. He described the effects of the electroshock weapon as “your worst muscle cramp ever—times 10 throughout your whole body.”
The colonel’s remark suggests that, in preparation for their “homefront” duties, rank-and-file troops are also being routinely Tasered. The brutalizing effect and intent of such a macabre training exercise is to inure troops against sympathy for the pain and suffering they may be called upon to inflict on the civilian population using these same “non-lethal” weapons.
An e-mail distributed by a Virginia teachers union encouraged members to bring politics into the classroom by wearing blue in support of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama and simultaneously suggested that the union’s voter registration efforts include those “you teach.”
The Virginia Education Association (VEA) e-mail drew strong criticism Wednesday from elected Republican officials and some residents after the state Republican Party obtained a copy. The author of the e-mail conceded Wednesday that the e-mail should have been worded differently.
The VEA is an affiliate of the National Education Association, the country’s largest teachers union.
“Schools should be perfectly neutral,” Virginia resident Julie Aurora said Wednesday. “They should teach students how to think, not what to think.”
The last thing socialists want is for people to learn how to think. Barack Obama couldn’t be elected as a dog catcher if the “youth” voting for him knew how to think. Turns out at least half of this country is incapable of thinking. All they can do is chant “change”.
This was sent to me by a friend. It so eloquently speaks to what we now face. We have faced it before and strong men prevailed.Read this and understand the danger we are in.
There is no freaking crisis. Just a constitutional crisis and a nefarious and insidious effort to steal this election.
Not Yours To Give
Col. David Crockett
US Representative from Tennessee
Originally published in “The Life of Colonel David Crockett,”
by Edward Sylvester Ellis.
One day in the House of Representatives a bill was taken up appropriating money for the benefit of a widow of a distinguished naval officer. Several beautiful speeches had been made in its support. The Speaker was just about to put the question when Crockett arose:
“Mr. Speaker–I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as much sympathy for the sufferings of the living, if suffering there be, as any man in this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy for a part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has not the power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money. Some eloquent appeals have been made to us upon the ground that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker, the deceased lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the day of his death, and I have never heard that the government was in arrears to him.
“Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot, without the grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it as charity. Mr. Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as we please. I am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill, but I will give one week’s pay to the object, and if every member of Congress will do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks.”
He took his seat. Nobody replied. The bill was put upon its passage, and, instead of passing unanimously, as was generally supposed, and as, no doubt, it would, but for that speech, it received but few votes, and, of course, was lost.
Later, when asked by a friend why he had opposed the appropriation, Crockett gave this explanation:
“Several years ago I was one evening standing on the steps of the Capitol with some other members of Congress, when our attention was attracted by a great light over in Georgetown. It was evidently a large fire. We jumped into a hack and drove over as fast as we could. In spite of all that could be done, many houses were burned and many families made houseless, and, besides, some of them had lost all but the clothes they had on. The weather was very cold, and when I saw so many women and children suffering, I felt that something ought to be done for them. The next morning a bill was introduced appropriating $20,000 for their relief. We put aside all other business and rushed it through as soon as it could be done.
“The next summer, when it began to be time to think about election, I concluded I would take a scout around among the boys of my district. I had no opposition there, but, as the election was some time off, I did not know what might turn up. When riding one day in a part of my district in which I was more of a stranger than any other, I saw a man in a field plowing and coming toward the road. I gauged my gait so that we should meet as he came to the fence. As he came up, I spoke to the man. He replied politely, but, as I thought, rather coldly.
“I began: ‘Well, friend, I am one of those unfortunate beings called
candidates, and—‘
“Yes I know you; you are Colonel Crockett. I have seen you once before, and voted for you the last time you were elected. I suppose you are out electioneering now, but you had better not waste your time or mine, I shall not vote for you again.”
“This was a sockdolager…I begged him to tell me what was the matter.
” ’Well, Colonel, it is hardly worth-while to waste time or words upon it. I do not see how it can be mended, but you gave a vote last winter which shows that either you have not capacity to understand the Constitution, or that you are wanting in the honesty and firmness to be guided by it. In either case you are not the man to represent me. But I beg your pardon for expressing it in that way. I did not intend to avail myself of the privilege of the constituent to speak plainly to a candidate for the purpose of insulting or wounding you. I intend by it only to say that your understanding of the Constitution is very different from mine; and I will say to you what, but for my rudeness, I should not have said, that I believe you to be honest.
…But an understanding of the Constitution different from mine I cannot overlook, because the Constitution, to be worth anything, must be held sacred, and rigidly observed in all its provisions. The man who wields power and misinterprets it is the more dangerous the more honest he is.’
An auditor for the Federal Election Commission is attempting to have his bosses seek a formal investigation into the collection by the Obama for President campaign of more than $200 million in potentially illegal political donations, including millions of dollars of illegal, foreign donations, and has sought a request for assistance from the Department of Justice or Federal Bureau of Investigation. But the analyst’s requests have largely been ignored. “I can’t get anyone to move. I believe we are looking at a hijacking of our political system that makes the Clinton and Gore fundraising scandals pale in comparison. And no one here wants to touch it.”
One reasons cited by his superiors, says the analyst, is that involvement by the Justice Department or FBI would be indicative of a criminal investigation, something the FEC would prefer not take place a month before the presidential election. Such actions, though, have been used to scuttle Republican campaigns in the past, the most famous being the Weinberger case in the days leading up to the 1992 re-election bid of President George H.W. Bush.
You probably know by now that the monstrosity that the Senate whores passed last night is far worse than the first one. I guess that bill only served to whet their appetites for more. And if this bastard of a bill passes the House, more is what they’ll get.
But you, if you are hard working American who has foolishly paid your bills and maintained your credit for your entire life? You? You are going to be getting it in your nether regions.
Energy? Sure, there is pork for energy, but not drilling. Not nuclear. God forbid that we strengthen our country, bring down the cost of living and employ millions with honest labor by building the means to energy independence. Hell, that might disturb some freaking snails and god damn polar bears. Here are some provisions that caught my attention, from A Blog For All:
Sec. 101. Renewable energy credit.
Sec. 102. Production credit for electricity produced from marine renewables.
Sec. 103. Energy credit.
Sec. 104. Energy credit for small wind property.
Sec. 105. Energy credit for geothermal heat pump systems.
Sec. 106. Credit for residential energy efficient property.
Sec. 107. New clean renewable energy bonds.
Sec. 201. Inclusion of cellulosic biofuel in bonus depreciation for biomass ethanol
plant property.
Sec. 202. Credits for biodiesel and renewable diesel.
Sec. 203. Clarification that credits for fuel are designed to provide an incentive
for United States production.
Sec. 204. Extension and modification of alternative fuel credit.
Sec. 205. Credit for new qualified plug-in electric drive motor vehicles.
Sec. 206. Exclusion from heavy truck tax for idling reduction units and advanced
insulation.
Sec. 207. Alternative fuel vehicle refueling property credit.
Sec. 208. Certain income and gains relating to alcohol fuels and mixtures, biodiesel
fuels and mixtures, and alternative fuels and mixtures
treated as qualifying income for publicly traded partnerships.
Sec. 211. Transportation fringe benefit to bicycle commuters.
Sec. 301. Qualified energy conservation bonds.
Sec. 302. Credit for nonbusiness energy property.
Sec. 303. Energy efficient commercial buildings deduction.
Sec. 304. New energy efficient home credit.
Sec. 305. Modifications of energy efficient appliance credit for appliances produced
after 2007.
Sec. 307. Qualified green building and sustainable design projects.
Sec. 308. Special depreciation allowance for certain reuse and recycling property.
See anything in there about oil? Nope, but hey! There is pork included for the mentally ill, and a damn good thing because that is what most of us who love America are going to be.
There’s also the Subtitle B—Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008.
Yeah, I feel much better now that I know that addicts are going to be provided for. Maybe they’ll start putting these miscreants in the foreclosed houses that will be sitting empty. I’m just waiting to hear one of these poverty pimps suggest that. So picture that nice, foreclosed, four bedroom colonial sitting, empty, next to your - now devalued - home being turned over to some pooooooor people who have never earned a freaking dime in their life, because it’s all about them you know. Just ask Acorn graduate Obama who must be having wet dreams over this turn of events.
And screw McCain who put his name to this travesty. I have little love for the man anyway, but it seems he left his powder and his balls in Viet Nam, because he ain’t defending American ideals now. What an opportunity for him to say that it is just these types of “progressive” policies that Barack Obama advocates that brought us to this juncture. What an opportunity for him to ask Obama and his band of advising thieves for a show of the dirty hands that they have had in the Fannie Mae pie for over a decade.
What an opportunity, for a real American with a pair of balls to say, enough already.
But it seems we have few real Americans in Washington, Just the spiritually emasculated and the character deprived clowns who are wiping the back of their hands across their greasy, greedy mouths as they feast on the carcass of America.
The whole idea behind this Marxist nightmare is to redistribute the wealth.
In his Communist Manifesto, published in 1848, Karl Marx proposed 10 measures to be implemented after the proletariat takes power, with the aim of centralizing all instruments of production in the hands of the state. Proposal Number Five was to bring about the “centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.”
If he were to rise from the dead today, Marx might be delighted to discover that most economists and financial commentators, including many who claim to favour the free market, agree with him.
Indeed, analysts at the Heritage and Cato Institute, and commentators in The Wall Street Journal and on this very page, have made declarations in favour of the massive “injection of liquidities” engineered by central banks in recent months, the government takeover of giant financial institutions, as well as the still stalled US$700-billion bailout package. Some of the same voices were calling for similar interventions following the burst of the dot-com bubble in 2001.
“Whatever happened to the modern followers of my free-market opponents?” Marx would likely wonder. (Source)
I live, unfortunately, in Ohio. It is unfortunate because this state is a swing state and is now crawling with Obamanites, a precursor, no doubt, to the National Youth Corps that the megalomaniac bastard Obama wants to create in this country.
This morning on a local talk show, several people called in reporting that they were positive some of the “youth” that Obama’s team were recruiting for voter registration were voting more than once. One man overheard a group of teens in his building bragging about it But how can that be? How can you register to vote and actually vote on the same day.
Well, if you have an Obama whore as your Secretary of State, it’s no problem
Ohio Secretary of State Democrat Jennifer Brunner is behind a new rule in the state that allows Ohio citizens to register and vote on the same day.
That law went into effect today.
Jennifer Brunner has also directed county boards of elections to deny absentee ballots to thousands of qualified Ohio electors who support Senator John McCain who fail to check a box that was not mandated by Ohio law.
[...] Normally in an election, partisan election monitors are allowed into polling places so that they can police each other. But not in two counties, Franklin and Montgomery, in Ohio. Brunner also issued an advisory opinion to counties saying that they are not required to allow election monitors.
Barack Obama has no intention of winning this election fair and square. What is going on in Ohio is beyond the pale.
Everyone wonders what a community organizer does. That is what they do and this is exactly the methods that Barack Obama is steeped in and it is this type of fraud that he taught at ACORN.
Obama is a member of ACORN and was trained by Acorn
Obama teaches election classes for ACORN
ACORN is a Leftist radical group previously charged and found guilty of election fraud and is currently under investigation for election registration fraud in six battleground states.
Acorn was infamous for using their slush fund to pressure lending institutions to promote loans to people who were not making enough money to qualify for a standard loan
Acorn was infamous for using their slush fund to pressure Democratic lawmakers to BLOCK LEGISLATION that would have prevented many of the defaulted loans we have TODAY. See 2005 law that Democrats blocked passage of.
ACORN is a major contributor to Obama campaign and other leading democrats in the House and Senate
Obama and the democratic Caucasus in the House who intentionally excluded the House Republicans from the structuring of the proposed bailout deal last week, had included a provision in the bill that would have funneled proceeds from the bailout in the amount of $20 billion dollars to go to ACORN. Again, a leftist radical slush fund that is used to pay off elected officials.
The Obama Campaign GAVE ACORN THIS YEAR APPROXIMATELY $800,000 for use in election registration efforts.
Obama said nothing about this payoff in the bill to ACORN when meeting in Washington last week in the White House. Only McCain did, and if it was not for him, we would have passed that bill, without the changes that were made following the “big Blow UP” in the white house last week, and the American Taxpayer would have funded another behind the scenes payoff to the democratic liberals and Obama, who are all corrupt.
Obama knew all about this payoff and was out telling the American people how NO RICH EXECUTIVE SHOULD GET A DIME, and the AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE PROTECTED.
BUT HE WAS HAPPY TO MAKE SURE BURIED IN THE BILL WAS A PROVISION TO PAY BACK ACORN (HIS GROUP) with a $20 BILLION DOLLAR GIFT AT THE EXPENSE OF THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER.
HOW CAN ANYONE TRUST THIS GUY TO A PRESIDENT WHO WILL LOOK AFTER THE PEOPLE AND NOT HIS “SPECIAL INTERESTS?”
Muslim Americans for Obama running illegal get out the vote drives at swingstate mosques this week — including Noor Center
UPDATE: For those who has asked about lawful voter registration drives at religious institutions, that is only legal IF the organization is non-partisan. “Muslim Americans for Obama”, the sponsor of these events, is unquestionably a partisan organization, and thus, any participation by these mosques is illegal and violates their tax exempt status. Additionally, since the Muslim Americans for Obama announcement says that these voter registration drives are intended to “get out the vote for Sen. Obama”, they are considered partisan (i.e. intended to benefit a specific candidate) under the law and illegal on that basis as well - in addition to the fact that these events are sponsored by a partisan organization.
And it doesn’t end there either. Click the link below to see the video (which should scare the hell out of you).
A homeless thug now registered to vote comments: “They picked me up. They seen me walkin’ around. So day said, ‘You wanna vote?’ I said, ‘Yeah, I’ll vote.’ (laughs) Day said, ‘We’ll take you anywhere you want.’ I said, ‘Dat’s cool’…If day say ’sign the ballot,’ just give ‘em and do exactly what they want you to do.’ I mean, hey, dis is America, you know?” (laughs).
Who does this new voter support?
“Barack! I mean, I want him to do his thang. You know, do his thug thizzle. You know. That’s how I like it to be. You know. (laughs).”
Yeah, these are the folks that the democrats have catered to for these many years with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “affordable housing”. You slaved to get your house, to keep your credit good, to make a secure future. These people? They are America’s socialist future. These are the “poor” who got mortgages with bad credit, no credit, no income verification. Nothing. The Obama “poor” have brought this country to the brink of financial collapse and they are passing a bill now that will penalize you, not them. As the value of your house declines as foreclosures sprout all around you, you can thank the “Progressives”. If you vote in the progressive, i.e., socialist Barack Obama, you damn well will deserve what you get.
And I do not want to hear crap about the cost of the Iraq war. A war that was necessary, is necessary to protect us from the Islamists who want us to fall, who are now gleeful over our present crumbling. Remember them? They remember you. They might as well nuke away. If Obama wins, this country will be reduced to rubble anyway.
No I’m not repeating myself, that is the title of this piece in The Edmond Sun by David Deming. Now this was written a week or so ago before the Dems’ time bomb of financial crisis exploded with such exquisite timing four weeks from the election and with which they have played such despicable games.
What is Barack Obama for? His campaign motto is “change.” But even a 6-year-old child understands that “change” can be either good or bad. Lacking specifics, the invocation of “change” as policy is completely empty. As we witness Obama’s minions mindlessly endorse the meaningless maxim of “change,” it only can call to mind the barnyard animals in George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” chanting “four legs good, two legs bad!”
The choice of Sarah Palin as John McCain’s running mate has been devastating for the Obama campaign precisely because she is everything Obama is not. Palin is not ashamed of her culture or country. She is not embarrassed by being an American, but naively embraces her birthright. Unassisted by affirmative action, Palin has risen to national prominence on the basis of her character, intelligence and natural gifts. In a word, she has guts. This is a woman who is proud of her country, not because it has granted her personal success, but because she respects what America stands for: freedom, opportunity, and individualism.
Obama is a vapid demagogue, a hollow man that despises American culture. He is ill-suited to be president of the United States. As the weeks pass, more Americans will come to this realization and elect McCain/Palin in a landslide.
My title should have been, ‘Will America Wake Up In Time’.
Harold Wilson, Briltish Prime Minister in the ’60’s famously said, a week is a long time in politics. We have four weeks to go, let’s pray that John McC makes good use of them.
