Road Sassy

And our pathetic government refuses to use the word jihad. And so it will go, this cancer that is Islam, feeding on the oily fat of a comatose West. And those of us who can see, who can hear, who do not retreat to denial, we are doomed to be awake throughout the coming barbarism. We have not been able to drown ourselves in the Kool-aid elixir of peace and compassion, understanding and dialog.

What utter rot.

Our enemies, supported by the governments that they leech from, overtake public streets bellowing their hatred of the kafir, their lurid loathing of all things Western. And police stand back, impotent and cowed, politicians stutter spittle flecked lies and platitudes, and the hapless progressive cows gaze about with bulging dazed eyes, glibly sputtering peace while the shimmering blade of the knife descends.
No wonder the terrorists love Obama. His spiritual roots are deep in the soil that this iman’s spirit feeds from. In fact, he and Rev. Wright could share the same pulpit.

I still don’t have an internet connection, I got fed up waiting for Primus to do something and went back to Bell. They are coming next Friday to upgrade the wiring here to high speed, then I’ll probably have to wait till they send a modem and hook me up. That will make it over a month. I’ve changed my bank acct so Primus can’t take any money out, they’ve billed me in spite of not providing internet service, my old server, VIF are threatening me with a collection agency for the next year’s payment even though I am no longer on line with them, what is it with these people? Bell is a bit more expensive but at least you know you’re dealing with a legitimate company.
Meantime I don’t have time on line to even keep up with my e-mail, I get to read a few of my favourite blogs and that’s it.
Otherwise I’m doing a seven day work week, got a bit behind schedule, the family is fine, got a few grand kid pics to post, also have the April Tree Pic, didn’t get one for March, it was mostly dull nondescript weather, there was no point trying.
Zee, I hope you are over your ‘bug’, sorry I’m not here to help out, how are you feeling now? Hey, at least spring is here with the summer to look forward to, my favourite time of year.

I wonder how many of you know of George Jonas, he writes in The National Post here in Canada, here is a sample column, this one on Israel’s 60′th birthday.

This week, about 100 prominent British Jews saw fit to publish a letter in the Guardian newspaper to outline why they’re not celebrating the birthday of a state that is, they say, “inflicting a monstrous collective punishment on the civilian population of Gaza and that continues to deny to Palestinians their human rights and national aspirations. We will celebrate when Arab and Jew live as equals in a peaceful Middle East.”

Do playwright Harold Pinter, Professor Haim Bresheeth, actress Miriam Margolyes, broadcaster Mike Rosen, and their friends really believe that it is Israel that stands in the way of Arabs and Jews living as equals in a peaceful Middle East? I don’t know what they believe, but that’s what they say.

Delusional? Well — the signatories are said to be well-oriented to time and place, can feed themselves, count backwards from 100 and tie their own shoelaces. Go figure.

Cya all!

Mother’s Day recognizes mothers for their dedication, resourcefulness and persistence. But some working mothers say that on the job, they’re viewed in opposite terms.

They say employers see them as less reliable, focused and committed than their co-workers, and weed them out of job interviews or bypass them for promotions.The practice has been labeled maternal profiling, and it is the source of a growing body of discrimination lawsuits being filed against employers.

According to the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California’s Hastings College of Law, family-related discrimination cases increased by 400 percent from 1996 to 2005. Some workers sued because they were questioned about their marital status, family plans or child-care provisions during job interviews, then promptly dismissed. Other mothers say they were taken out of contention for jobs that required travel, long hours or physical labor.(Source)

I am so sick of people who make lifestyle choices that place them outside of the mainstream, yet, they are never ready to accept the consequences of those choices. If I am hiring someone for a key position that is integral to the success of my business, a position that requires a person to be extremely focused and able to dedicate 110%, and that applicant tells me that they are three months pregnant, I am supposed to act as if that isn’t a negative? When I know that the position simply has demands that will not allow for prolonged absences, not allow for extended “time off”, I’m supposed to forgo what is in the best interests of my business to accommodate some convoluted notion of discriminatory hiring practices?

And, I’m sorry, but women are so damn predictable when it comes to wanting their cake and eating it too. They want to dress like sluts, yet still demand respect. They want the sexual freedom to rut like dogs, and then they want society to bless them when they kill off the ensuing inconvenient litters. ( After all, babies are punishment in a world governed by Obama’s progressive values.) They want to break through those never ending glass ceilings as long as they don’t have to hurt their pretty, little heads. They want to make the commitment to bring a human life into the world, yet expect a business owner to pretend that such a commitment will not impact their job performance.

Would you apply for a full time job when you already have one and then expect the prospective employer to pretend that your prior commitments will not impinge on the time and dedication that the job position demands? Contrary to the prevailing “wisdom” that parenting is a task that can be slipped in between more pressing concerns, being a mother is a full time job. A woman applies for it while on her back, in bed, and if she came to that particular interview without protection, then she damn well better be prepared to perform in the position that her actions indicated she was willing to accept.

“If motherhood were viewed as the full-time job it is,” Ms. Venker contends, “it would not be considered something we could do on the side, and women would be less inclined to try to balance career and motherhood, only to discover, many stress-filled years later, that it cannot be done.” ¹

But the MSM isn’t going to focus on the damaged children and broken families left behind in the wake of working mothers. They are going to continue to perpetuate the fallacy that these women deserve special consideration while they are in the workforce.

Katie Mullins-Hall of Price Hill moved from a temporary worker to a full-time position at a local furniture wholesaler. Her first day on the job, while filling out medical forms, she mentioned she might be pregnant. “They said, ‘Why don’t you go home, and when you find out for sure if you’re pregnant, let us know. We need someone we can count on every day,’” Mullins-Hall said. “I waited a couple of weeks, but back then women didn’t know we could fight it.”

No Katie, back then the bogus claim of discrimination had not yet gained credibility. “We need someone we can count on every day…” And that is unreasonable? Would the same woman hire someone to remodel her house to the tune of a 1/2 million bucks if the contractor showed up 7 months pregnant with a toddler in tow?

Today, women at every professional level can face such discrimination. Carol Gibbs, chief executive officer of the welfare diversion program Accountability and Credibility Together, says mothers who work entry-level jobs are often fired as soon as they start missing work with sick children.

“…mothers who work entry-level jobs are often fired as soon as they start missing work with sick children.” And why shouldn’t they be fired?!? Why the hell should I, as an employer, have to suffer the consequences of hiring anyone whose personal circumstances make them unreliable. Why is it the employer’s problem that a woman can’t figure out birth control? That she is so besotted with magical thinking that she has allowed herself to buy into the super mom myth. Yeah, the super mom can “do it all”, but apparently only if she is propped up by her employer or by tax payers. Yeah, these independent women are something to behold.

… “I’m seeing it in sales - assumptions are made that a woman with small children won’t be able to travel,” she said. “Twenty years ago, men did overtly make those assumptions. Now it’s a little more subtle but it’s there - that mothers just can’t travel, or that they shouldn’t, that ’she’s not a very good mother because she puts her job before her kids.’”

I’m quite sorry, but any woman who puts their “career” before their child is not a great candidate for motherhood.. She may be a “good” mother, however, today’s definition of a “good mother” seems to be reduced to describing those women who juggle their kids’ lives the most adroitly without dropping them completely between the cracks of their ambitions. If a kid is still breathing and bears some semblance to a human being, the progressive mother’s maternal obligations have been satisfied. Incidental is the state of their child’s soul, the direction of their moral compass, or the quality of their character - if any of that is even an issue for the “modern” mother.

Mary Eberstadt, author of Home-Alone America, makes some very interesting observations when pondering why the venal claptrap that passes for lyrics in contemporary music has resonance with today’s youth. “What is it about today’s music, violent and disgusting though it may be, that resonates with so many American kids?

As it turns out, such an exercise yields a fascinating and little understood fact about today’s adolescent scene. If yesterday’s rock was the music of abandon, today’s is that of abandonment.

The odd truth about contemporary teenage music — the characteristic that most separates it from what has gone before — is its compulsive insistence on the damage wrought by broken homes, family dysfunction, checked-out parents, and (especially) absent fathers.

Papa Roach, Everclear, Blink-182, Good Charlotte, Eddie Vedder and Pearl Jam, Kurt Cobain and Nirvana, Tupac Shakur, Snoop Doggy Dogg, Eminem — these and other singers and bands, all of them award-winning top-40 performers who either are or were among the most popular icons in America, have their own generational answer to what ails the modern teenager.

Surprising though it may be to some, that answer is: dysfunctional childhood. Moreover, and just as interesting, many bands and singers explicitly link the most deplored themes in music today — suicide, misogyny, and drugs — with that lack of a quasi-normal, intact-home personal past.

To put this perhaps unexpected point more broadly, during the same years in which progressive-minded and politically correct adults have been excoriating Ozzie and Harriet as an artifact of 1950s-style oppression, many millions of American teenagers have enshrined a new generation of music idols whose shared generational signature in song after song is to rage about what not having had a nuclear family has done to them. This is quite a fascinating puzzle of the times. The self-perceived emotional damage scrawled large across contemporary music may not be statistically quantifiable, but it is nonetheless among the most striking of all the unanticipated consequences of our home-alone world. (emphasis mine) (source)

Not that it makes much difference to the femi-nazi, social engineering whores whose cherished goal is the destruction of that nuclear family. No doubt, their utopia consists of women depositing infants into the hands of the state a day after birth. But the Marxist reality that the destruction of the family unit reflects is an entirely different topic.

I have two daughter-in-laws who are both expecting their second child. They are under no illusions that the market place ought to accommodate them. In fact, daughter-in-law ‘O’ illustrates exactly why companies are justifiably reluctant to hire women who are mothers or are expecting.

‘O’ was promoted to a managerial position with a “progressive” company who didn’t stutter a jot when she announced that she was pregnant with her first child one month into her new position. She had a rough pregnancy while trying to take on the new responsibilities that retail management entail. The job suffered and she suffered. She took her maternity leave, promising to return to working full tilt after six weeks. Never happened.

‘O’ is an intelligent woman who unfortunately bought into the “you can do it all” anthem she grew up with. She quickly discovered she was sold a bill of goods.

You see, one thing feminists really hate is that something profound usually occurs to the woman of a newborn. A shift occurs inside that turns preconceived notions of mothering right on their heads. Careers loose their appeal and selfishness gives way to that part of a woman who can never give enough for their child. Yeah, feminism has little use for maternal instincts. But they kick in. Fortunately, my son is adamant that ‘O’ not work and god willing, the “progressives” represented by the Obama-ites won’t force her back into the job market with their elevated fuel prices and economy killing, nanny state ambitions.

And as an aside, I am finding it very interesting that both of my sons, survivors of this “career” woman, are adamant that their wives not work, even if it means that they are facing horrendous schedules and stringent budgets. It also seems to be the general attitude of their immediate peers. I have no way of knowing if this is a trend, but there is a generation coming up that is not in the least bit represented on MTV or reality TV. They are a generation who have eaten the fruit that the harvest from “liberated women” has yielded, and they have found it very bitter.

Now if Conan would only mock a few Muslim imans, but then, Rev Wright hasn’t advanced to issuing fatwas yet, so Conan is safe.

(Ed: Posting should resume tomorrow, and we thank you for your patience.)

I have been waylaid by some rogue flu bug and thus, have been absent from duty, and I do apologize. As fate would have it, Ligneus has been having connection problems and still is off line. Sitting upright for any length of time is proving to be an uncomfortable experience, so this is when we start digging through those archives.

I give you “Where Are the Watchmen?” from April of ‘06. The question still remains in ‘08.

“In August 2004, a local planning commission in Little Rock, Arkansas, granted The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[3] While the imam, Aquil Hamidullah, says his goal is to create “a clean community, free of alcohol, drugs, and free of gangs,”[4] the implications for U.S. jurisprudence of this and other internal enclaves are greater: while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.”
[…]
The Islamic Center for Human Excellence may seek to segregate schools and offices by gender. The enclave might also exercise broad control upon commerce within its boundaries-provided the economic restrictions did not discriminate against out-of-state interests or create an undue burden upon interstate commerce. But most critically, the enclave could promulgate every internal law-from enforcing strict religious dress codes to banning alcohol possession and music; it could even enforce limits upon religious and political tolerance. Although such concepts are antithetical to a free society, U.S. democracy allows the internal enclave to function beyond the established boundaries of our constitutional framework. At the very least, the permissible parameters of an Islamist enclave are ill defined.”

Hordes of self-righteous illegal mexicans parade like so many pompous little Napoleons while chanting insulting demands, supported by the liberals and the media and a president who apparently has neither the will nor wisdom that conservatives foolishly ascribed to the man. While the Mexican make their claim upon our land, Muslims are appropriating our country. They know the lay of the land, the threats to make, the alliances to grease. They are a cancer mutating through our government, our prisons, our universities and our communities, culling leagues of political sycophants, networking like the most adept American sales pro, bartering lies for concessions, embraced by a body of politicians whom I can only describe as decayed in will, spirit and mind; a passel of febrile and castrated men whose convictions are dry rotted - shredding at the merest wisp of a breeze - unable to support an ideal nor a promise.

I’m weary with the reading of it and the writing of it. Conservatives have to move against all the existing limitations and encroachments on free speech being imposed under so called hate speech laws. Any and all other convolutions of the law that the priesthood of liberal judges can conjure up to suppress opposition have to be firmly routed and defeated. If we can’t gain that ground back, we lose it all.
We have to be free to lawfully monitor every frigging land deal, every local election, every elected or nominated member on school boards, every bit of curriculum our kids see. We have to somehow raise enough awareness of the kind of deals and concessions that are being made and put these subterranean Muslim political machinations above the radar so that all of us know that a mosque is proposed or state-church law is to be violated , or 8 weeks of Islamic studies have been placed in the curriculum.

We have got to take the battle back to them and by them I mean the left and Islam. Be it Soros or Socialists or John Dean or Sheik Mo-frigging-hammad - they will destroy America. The riots that we see in France by a lazy pathetic and cowardly populace will soon be our plight. Maybe by then the American flag will be completely banned. Should it come to the point where we allow that to happen then we don’t deserve to fly her any longer. There is no courage or vision left in government and all of the men worthy of leading this country are being killed in Iraq.

For what?

So the rest of us can just continue to get our teeth kicked out by libs and muslims and their trained media flunkies? They fight and we sleep.
But to tell you the truth, I don’t sleep all that well these days anymore.

We need watchmen on the walls folks.

Where Are the Watchmen?

I’m a simple person. Since childhood, jumping in a car -  just to cruise, just for a ride, just to get lost - was always a pleasant way to spend the day. Discovery of some new, out-of- the-way attraction was always a possibility; a mom and pop restaurant, an obscure local museum, a great park or a unique store. The habit to hit the road to sooth rankled nerves has continued throughout my life.

Until now. Now my fiances are not too hot and I can’t really afford to be frivolous, and thanks to the anti-progressives who have put a stranglehold on the economy with their regressive environmental global warming nightmare, I can’t afford to simply head out on a simple hundred mile jaunt when the mood strikes me.

Another simple pleasure is spending an afternoon with the grand kids topped off with a trip to Burger King or some other junk food purveyor. But that may yet be another basic enjoyment that your friendly neighborhood Nazi “progressives” seek to deny you. Those same social engineering whores - spawned from some fetid communal pool of psychopathic control freaks - who are trying to control your use of energy are continuing their ludicrous attempts to control what you eat.

The sputtering economy has caused an increase in prices of many staples including gasoline, rice, ice cream, even beer. Now some lawmakers in New Jersey are considering taking food taxes a step further and install a proverbial “sin” tax on fast food.

Yes, the idea of marking up your favorite fast food burger or pack of fries is actually being tossed around, and it’s not settling well with many residents.

“They’re taxing everything. Now you’re gonna tax fast food? That’s crazy,” said Newark resident Miriam Robertson.
[…]
Still, some say taxing fast food isn’t such a bad idea.

“I think this country has gone too much in the direction of fast and unhealthy food, and if people are taxed they may terminate that and turn toward more healthy foods,” said West Orange resident Maureen Felix. (Source)

No Maureen , if people are taxed, some may just turn around and “terminate” budding nazis like you.