The Insanity of Appeasing Muslims

muslim bitch

It seems too lunatic to be true. But here a hair salon boss reveals how she was driven to the brink of ruin - and forced to pay £4,000 for ‘hurt feelings’ - after refusing to hire a Muslim stylist who wouldn’t show her hair at work.

[...]

For a year, Sarah has been facing financial ruin, due to a compensation claim for £34,000 brought by Bushra, 19, who has maintained she is due that figure after being turned down for a job at the Wedge salon in London’s King’s Cross.

In the event, the tribunal ruled this week that while Bushra’s claim of direct discrimination failed, her claim for indirect discrimination had succeeded.

Sarah has therefore been ordered to pay £4,000 compensation by way of ‘injury to feelings’.

Although this is a smaller sum than she’d feared she might have to hand over, Sarah, 32, is still outraged.

‘I am a small business and the bottom line is that this is not a woman who worked for me,’ says Sarah.

The muslim in question was also rejected by 25 other salons and even though she admits that Sarah said nothing that could be construed as an insult, she opted to sue. My guess is that Sarah looked like the softest target.

This is what comes of the ludicrous notion that offended feelings deserve compensation. Moreover it speaks to the insidious control the state exerts over the private business owner who has less and less freedom to conduct business profitably or in accordance with their beliefs. Such interference with private enterprise becomes even more insidious when coupled with the additional threat posed by  the very dangerous momentum with which sharia compliant banking is being implemented across the world. As it progresses, so does the imposition of sharia law.

islam_will_dominate_1

Yet, we allow muslims continue to use our laws against us. And it isn’t just in England. Islam has global ambitions, and as one writer cautions, while warning of the acceleration of muslim sponsored censorship, it has become an issue that crosses all national boundaries.

“We can no longer be secure in the knowledge that our own laws or constitution will protect us. THE WHOLE WORLD IS UNDER THREAT and we’ve got to be watching for changes globally rather than nationally if we want to be prepared for what is going to absolutely affect each one of us.” (source)

From refusing to wear uniforms, to protesting male western doctors  treating muslim women, to muslim taxi cab drivers demanding special privileges , not to mention the pathetic dhimmis who acquiesce to muslim extortion, like the execrable Oregon principle who had the audacity to ban the Pledge of Allegiance in an American public elementary school, for fear of offending Muslims.

This list can go on and on -  creeping sharia and cultural jihad continues, abetted by the left, in nation after nation.

What the hell is it going to take for Americans to freaking wake up? And it won’t be Barack Hussein Obama who finally gets a clue, the would-be president who finds the shrill islamic “call to prayer” melodic and permits advocacy of “honor” killings on his official campaign site...

In 1997, Sarah got a job at a salon on London’s Portobello Road, where she remained for almost a decade. In March 2006, feeling ready to spread her wings, she wrote a business plan, secured a loan and invested £5,000 of her savings into the lease on a small salon on Caledonian Road.

[...]

‘I’d never felt as proud as I did on the day I picked up the keys to my salon,’ says Sarah.I was prepared to put my heart and soul into my business in order to make ends meet, and for the first few months, I worked 12 hours a day, six days a week, all by myself. ‘I barely saw daylight, but I didn’t mind because I was fulfilling my ambition.

[...]

By March 2007, the business was doing so well that Sarah needed to take on another stylist. (source)

iranipc dotcom 7

And then a muslim walked in.  A muslim applying to an “edgy” salon, garbed in head scarf down to her brows. And she was looking for an excuse to sue, of that I have no doubt. Sarah interviewed her, discovered that she would refuse  to remove her head scarf and that was the end of it in her mind. If style is the product that you sell, and hair is the showcase, it is rather obvious that a dour muslim with nary a wisp of hair showing isn’t a good match. Rather like applying to be a nude model and refusing to take off your clothes. A sensible person simply wouldn’t apply.

One morning in the second week of June 2007, an innocuous white envelope landed on Sarah’s doormat. It contained a letter saying that she was being sued for £15,000 for indirect and direct discrimination by Bushra Noah. This, the letter stated, related to compensation for injury to her feelings and lost earnings. Later, that figure was increased to £34,000.

And so it goes. In every country where muslims are seeking a stronghold,  charges of discrimination and threats of lawsuits are becoming common. It is the same victim’s templates used by all so-called minorities. And  small business owners simply trying to hold their own, to make a living, are confronted with a well oiled grievance machine with absolutely no support from their individual governments. In fact, too many governments are bending their knees to these extortionists.

If you, as an American, have no intention of bowing down before foreign gods, then you damn well better start fighting.

Sphere: Related Content

  1. Muslims In Kilts Might be An Improvement… On Second Thought.....
  2. Offending Muslims...
  3. Note to Voters: Hussein Obama Loves the Music That Muslims Kill By...
  4. Sharia Law Firm Secretaries Unmasked as Porn Actresses...
  5. McCartney and Mickey: The Latest To Be Condemned to Death by Muslims...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 18th, 2008 at 5:38 pm and is filed under Dhimmi Alerts, Elections, Muslims / Islam, Muslims Suck, War With Islam, Western Civilization. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

16 Responses to “The Insanity of Appeasing Muslims”

Aurora June 19th, 2008 at 5:39 am

If it can happen to this young woman who just happened to be the unfortunate victim of this bloodsucker, it can happen to any of us. I blame the stupid court who awarded the judgment to the Muslim woman. Do we not have the right to hire who we please now?

zee June 19th, 2008 at 6:23 pm

Do we not have the right to hire who we please now?

Nope, ‘fraid not. As you say, it can happen to any of us and it will happen to those of us who have the fewest resources to fight it. Between muslims, and in America, the ACLU, gay groups, transgendereds or whatever other group pleads victim status- who can stand a chance?
My son has described those minorities in his office who plainly defy the rules and fail to produce. They clearly understand that the company has to jump through many legal hoops in order to fire them and they take advantage of it to the max.
CAIR particularly seeks out any thing that might be construed as offensive or discriminatory. If the person or company is an easy target they start with their threats of lawsuits and reprisals. Like the ACLU, they hope to establish legal precedents to use as ammunition in future lawsuits. The victim game is as lucrative as Gore’s global warming scams.

zee June 19th, 2008 at 9:48 pm

I agree Akira. A real war resulting in a crippled and devastated Middle East. If Bush handled Iraq with an iron fist instead of kids glove and made it clear that our enemies face certain death when they come against America, the world would look a bit different . Instead we have limp-wristed judges allocating the rights that our soldiers die for to our enemies while prosecuting soldiers who are doing their duty for murder.

Thanks for the link. Those are videos are unsettling.

Akira June 20th, 2008 at 1:47 am

Hi Zee,

I wouldn’t object to a military conflict with “The Muslim World” as a last resort, conducted by competent leaders, with rational objectives. However that is very unlikely to happen in our generation.

Not only that, but clearly many millions of fifth columnists (not only Muslims) and defeatists, and suicidal idiots in the West would be working to undermine any military action.

This is a fact. Change would only come after perhaps fifty to hundred 9/11’s, 7/7’s, Madrids, Balis, etc.

And the situation in Western Europe, the Balkans, and Russia looks dire.

Therefore, I mostly a personal, spiritual, intellectual and if necessary physical war. In ten years I’ve only met one other person who has the same opinion as me regarding Islamization. Even the majority of self-described Christians and Conservatives I meet insist on this mythical “moderate Islam”, even going so far as to suggest that Islam would “improve” if Muslim immigration to the West would increase! In fact I find it more frustrating to talk with “Christians” and “Conservatives”, because even though they see the problems, they refuse to face the logical conclusions (Islam is evil, there should be no compromise).

My main reason to start blogging (which is mostly just a scrap-book) was just to relive frustration, and record what is happening around us before revisionists start re-writing history and quotes and events start disappearing “down the memory hole.”

Re-reading this comment, it seems quite depressing. But that’s why I say we are really at war. And we should be prepared for this long, personal, spiritual war with no sure outcome. I try to imagine how Serbs and others stayed strong and maintained their faith and sanity in spite of CENTURIES of virtual slavery (Devshirme etc) under Islam. They were born under Islam and died under Islam.

I’m amazed that Christians fought for centuries to drive Muslims out of Iberia and the Balkans, and now an atheist elite and a cowed populace are just ready to offer North Africans and Turks free passports.

Oh well. What can you do about it?

I’m 100% sure that things must get much worse before they can even start to get better.

Just do the right thing, and do what you can.

Akira June 20th, 2008 at 3:14 am

Re: “I am not a Christian, but prepared to fight for Christianity. One reason that I can not honestly profess Christianity is because there is no way I can “love my enemies”. At least not if it actually means turning the other cheek to Islam. To give such a witness seems the same as throwing pearls before swine. It isn’t going to convert any muslim to watch Christianity consent to it’s own demise through weakness.”

Akira:

Turning the other cheek, in response to a slap, does not mean that if a Muslim rapes your son then you should offer him your daughter.

Also, it’s possible to love your enemies even as you blow their brains out in self-defense.

The best way to love your enemy would be to convert them.

I’ve actually had so-called “christians” tell me that a Christian can’t have any enemies, since Jesus instructed us to love our enemies. Logic is not this kind of people’s strong point. How could we love our enemies if we didn’t have any?

The real Enemy is the Devil. Jesus taught his followers to pray, “deliver me from the Evil One.”

Naturally, any of the Devil’s acolytes, including Muslims and people who willfully pervert the Gospel, are also the enemy.

* * * * *

If any of this makes sense to you, perhaps you are more Christian than you realize. [?]

* * * * *

http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/st-francis-on-why-christians-should-not-accept-muslim-occupation-and-should-go-to-war-to-defend-the-faith/

http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/our-struggle-is-not-against-flesh-and-blood-but-against-the-principalities-powers-against-the-world-rulers-of-this-darkness-and-against-the-evil-spiritual-forces-of-the-supernatural-realms/

zee June 20th, 2008 at 11:11 pm

Hi Akira, I apologize for the tardy response. My new grandchild tried to be born today but then changed her mind - third time this week - at any rate back home and back to business, so to speak.

competent leaders, with rational objectives

There is a global shortage of leaders and rationality, and as you say, all efforts to execute a war would be undermined.

And the situation in Western Europe, the Balkans, and Russia looks dire.

And ignored, overlooked. I really despise the role America played in Kosovo’s recent “independence”. The area, as in the century past, is a bloody powder keg. And islam grows unabated, unless Russia steps in. I still cannot get over Bush’s ludicrous remark about Putin shortly after 9-11 - something about looking in his eyes. What the hell that man actually “sees” in the many egregious alliances he is invested in I guess will always remain a mystery.

Even the majority of self-described Christians and Conservatives I meet insist on this mythical “moderate Islam”, even going so far as to suggest that Islam would “improve” if Muslim immigration to the West would increase! In fact I find it more frustrating to talk with “Christians” and “Conservatives”, because even though they see the problems, they refuse to face the logical conclusions (Islam is evil, there should be no compromise).

I admit that when I first started studying islam, it took awhile to wrap my mind around a people who are essentially repulsed by freedom. You absolutely have to remove the western paradigm and think tribal when trying to grasp the arab people.
And that is the mistake that well meaning people make. They see through a western lens, assuming our freedoms are highly desirable. But as we have come to see, in both the left and islam - freedom is too much a burden to bear.

record what is happening around us before revisionists start re-writing history and quotes and events start disappearing “down the memory hole.”

Alas, that has already begun, and I fear greatly for whatever freedoms we have here online. I think tome is growing short for that as well.

I’m amazed that Christians fought for centuries to drive Muslims out of Iberia and the Balkans, and now an atheist elite and a cowed populace are just ready to offer North Africans and Turks free passports.

My mother was an infant in her Serbian mother’s arms when she got to America from what was then Yugoslavia. My father from Romania - neither would speak of the “old country” - I had never known of the muslim component, just the communist. They are both gone now, and their secrets about my families roots with them, but my lasting impression, given the vigor with which they embraced all things American, there was nothing but bloodshed and sorrows in the lands that they’d never speak of.
Todays Americans have no freaking clue of what they are doing, no clue of what they are destroying.

I’m 100% sure that things must get much worse before they can even start to get better.

Just do the right thing, and do what you can.

Agree, on both points.

zee June 20th, 2008 at 11:44 pm

If any of this makes sense to you, perhaps you are more Christian than you realize.

Well yes, it does make sense.
I spent a number of years in scripture, as a Christian, and walked away. It was a matter of judging god, a dumb thing, and also being, finally, repelled by the “body of Christ” with whom we are instructed to fellowship. I guess I am simply not a joiner, but i came to distrust any “word of god” delivered by men. And the church was infected by the same therapeutic, touchy feelie, navel gazing as the secular world - they just slapped God’s name all over it.

But those years in scripture had a very lasting effect, after a period of forgetfulness. I came to discover the truths therein were reliable.
Deuteronomy expressed the bottom line for me. you choose life, or you choose death. Every decision you make reflects that choice - choose “death ” too often, and your soul rots.
With islam, and the left, i distill it to that principle. Life vrs death, light vrs darkness, good vrs evil.
The left and islam personify death, they embrace all that is alien to god. They serve the flesh, not the spirit.
That I know to be true.
Though I trust the bible, I have come to distrust what was taught, by men, from it, tainted as it was with the “world” - a world that seeks to reduce Jesus to a pathetic wimp, or defile him with humanity’s worse traits.
I figure if god wants to work on my heart, or I allow Him to, whatever I need to do with enemies will become clear.
But from what I have seen of His creation, I seriously doubt that God is a pacifist.

Akira June 21st, 2008 at 1:50 pm

Re: “Though I trust the bible, I have come to distrust what was taught, by men, from it, tainted as it was with the “world””

But this is not logical, Zee. If it weren’t for “men” and the Church, then how would you know what the Bible says?

It was Jewish scholars who determined what is in the Old Testament, what is “Apocrypha”, and what is not divinely inspired. It was these Scriptures that taught Jesus Christ. Are you saying that you trust the Bible, but not the people who compiled it [the Septuagint and so on]?

It was The Church which recorded, read, disseminated, collated, and finally canonized what came to be known as the New Testament [at the first Ecumenical Synods].

The Church predates the New Testament. This is a fact. The Church was prefigured in Jesus’s disciples, created and sanctified at Pentecost, taught by the Apostles, and first called “Christian” [at Antioch] years before any of the Gospels or Epistles or the Revelation were ever written.

Therefore, to dismiss or denigrate the Church is to also denigrate the Bible.

Re: “I figure if god wants to work on my heart, or I allow Him to, whatever I need to do with enemies will become clear.”

With respect, isn’t that the same method as those who make up “the church…infected by the same therapeutic, touchy feelie, navel gazing as the secular world - they just slapped God’s name all over it.”?

I was listening to a Northern Irish radio show, and a woman called in to say. “I’m Christian and I support gay marriage, and gay sex of any kind for that matter!”

A minister that they’d invited on to the show in order to systematically ridicule asked, “How can you say that when the Bible clearly teaches that homosexuality s disordered?”

She called him an ignorant bigot [is there another kind of bigot, I wonder] and said, “I believe in what Jesus said, not in the Bible, which is the work of men!” ["Men" was spat out with particular disgust.]

But how does she know what Jesus said? Because it was recorded in the Bible, by the Church. And collated by the Church. And Canonized by the Church. So if she dismisses the Church, then she’s saying that there’s no way of knowing what Jesus ever actually taught. But she “feels” it …

The minister was in no place to dispute with her either, since he is part of the cult of “sola scriptura” founded by the German monk who also denigrated the Church that the “scriptura” was part of.

“The left and islam personify death, they embrace all that is alien to god. They serve the flesh, not the spirit.”

Mostly I agree, in that they are certainly anti-life, the Left is essentially materialist, and Islam is also very materialist and utilitarian, like The Borg.

But both are also anti-Christian heresies.

The Left was founded completely by Christians who gradually made it a “Christianity without Christ”. The Hammer and Sickle is from the book of Isaiah. And Moham [Piss Be Upon Him] and his followers cobbled together The Unholy Koran from his illiterate poorly remembered ravings based on converstaions with and about Jews and Christians. He and his followers said that Chritian and Jewish scripture are corrupted, but he knows what God [or his moon god Allah] really said.

This is what happens when people invent their own gods.

- Akira

Best wishes with your new grandchild!

Akira June 21st, 2008 at 2:17 pm

I’d like to recommend the best history of the Church I’ve ever read, which clarifies and corrects many of the lies and distortions that are so prevalent.

I put it here, at the bottom of the page:

http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/06/21/the-holy-land/

Akira June 21st, 2008 at 2:38 pm

Re: “I have come to distrust what was taught, by men, from it”

I see now.

You mean the kind of thing I was talking about? That people just use the Bible to support their own particular idol [Marx, Obama, Moham, The UN, etc]?

zee June 21st, 2008 at 3:07 pm

Are you saying that you trust the Bible, but not the people who compiled it [the Septuagint and so on]?

No, I should have put it in context - I don’t trust those preaching the gospel today - those are the “men” I do not trust. I was in church for only 5 years, and in one I was their token drug addict that God saved, in another they tried to twist scripture into a type of “name it and claim” it faith, much like Oprah’s perverted “think it and you’ll get it if your vibes are right,” or the “Think and grow Rich” type crap. In the last church I ended up doing the funeral for a kid who had been in my “kinship” because the freaking pastor was too busy giving seminars to sell his book. ( his mother asked that I speak - she had been hoping the pastor could reach all of his addict friends who were to be there)
The kid was trying to kick, straighten out, needed some common sense guidance - like how to look for a job, or save money - but they didn’t address any of that - just all kind of nonsense about him being anointed by God -based on his beautiful artistic renderings of Christ - to preach when the kid hardly knew scripture. He overdosed in the end. In that church they treated the “Holy Spirit” as some kind of extra in the wings who came out whenever “a word from God” was needed.

My son is in a church now and when I ask him what they say about Islam or how to deal with the perversions now being taught in school so that he can guide his son through the public school quagmire , he says they don’t mention it. I went to see him baptized and the sermon that day was some touchy feely crap on how God would take away their depression. What happened to girding up your loins?

Re: “I figure if god wants to work on my heart, or I allow Him to, whatever I need to do with enemies will become clear.”

With respect, isn’t that the same method as those who make up “the church


Well, I hope not. I don’t mean it in the sense that I am waiting to hear some special message tailored for my sensibilities. I am saying that if I go back to god, it will be to his Word as recorded in scripture. As I remember, the Holy Spirit reveals his word, makes it comprehensible to the believer… can’t remember the scripture.

I am saying I won’t listen to a preacher interpret those words for me, but trust that God reveals himself to those who earnestly seek him.

Therefore, to dismiss or denigrate the Church is to also denigrate the Bible

That isn’t what I mean to do, but i loathe “groups”, I loathe the insularity that they develop. In my experience with the church, it is they who denigrate God and bible. But, as I say, I only attended for five years and after becoming angry, I judged God - wrong, but i ended up walking away.

I’d rather just be a watchman on the wall, shouting warnings. God might have a place for me, maybe not. It simply is not in my makeup to enjoy “fellowship.” I barely have a heart left at all and wonder that I am not totally deadened to God. Yet I’m not. I long for Him, just simply can’t get there from here it appears. But I seriously doubt that the present day body of Christ will be much help. And yes, I’m judging, but, what can I say, I’m a bitch.

Best wishes with your new grandchild!
Thank you, she is not quite here yet. We have been to the hospital three times but they keep sending my daughter-in-law home and she doesn’t want to be induced. They live with me so I am in the midst of it, for which I am grateful, but it plays havoc with blogging, as it should.
And I do appreciate this discussion - do not wish to appear confrontational. Just have a hard time accepting some things.

zee June 21st, 2008 at 3:11 pm

I’d like to recommend the best history of the Church I’ve ever read, which clarifies and corrects many of the lies and distortions that are so prevalent.

Awesome, I will read it, thank you. Hunger for it actually.

zee June 21st, 2008 at 3:14 pm

I see now.

You mean the kind of thing I was talking about? That people just use the Bible to support their own particular idol [Marx, Obama, Moham, The UN, etc]?

 

yes, and the experiences i describe in my longer response above (we must be posting at the same time)

Akira June 21st, 2008 at 5:48 pm

Hi again!

Yes, I get what you mean now.

I’m also not trying to be confrontational.

I had many experiences like that too.

I went to a Chinese Mennonite church where they had everyone singing in Cantonese, English and Mandarin all at the same time! “It doesn’t matter how it sounds. God can understand every language.”

A Baptist church where the minister denied it was Baptist (even though they have a website run by the Baptist church, and a bio of the minister saying he attended a Baptist seminary). He didn’t want to be exclusive you see…

He also apologized to all Muslims for “all the terrible sins committed” against them by Catholics. “But we didn’t do any of that. God loves Muslims. We all pray to the same god.”

I could go on, and on.

I’m an Orthodox Christian because:

(a) It’s the Church of Christ (and The Trinity Church, and Evangelical, and Catholic, and Orthodox, and The Church of Jerusalem, and The Real Roman Church, and Episcopal, and Baptist, and every other thing that out-of-work protestants come up with to try and give their new “churches” a catchy brand-name).

(b) Since God is One, and Church is the Body of Christ, there can only be one Church. “Sects” and “denominations” are just ways of normalizing error, misinterpretation, heresy, and schism.

(c) The Pope, God bless him, is only The Bishop of Rome.

(d) All Protestants are crypto-papists, whether they know it or not, since all protestants have ultimately broken off from Rome (Anglicans, Lutherans, Calvinists etc -> Methodists, Puritans, Quakers etc -> United, Tele-Evangelists etc etc etc etc etc. (Plus JWs and Mormons). All derive from Rome, which has been going down a wrong path since Charlemagne.

(e) All humans are sinners, and fallible, but no matter how bad an individual Orthodox Christian (including priests and Bishops) is, he/she cannot change Church teaching, since that must be agreed on by the whole Church (hence the importance of the Ecumenical Synods/Councils).

(f) I think it good to have a liturgy. Otherwise phony ministers (and crazy renegade priests like Michael “America is he Worst Sin Against God” Pfleger) will just shove whatever un-Godly rubbish they’ve come up with that Sunday into the Church service.

(g) The Word is not just scripture, but also Icons, action, and Communion.

Anyway, it makes sense to me.  Also when I look at world history.

The Roman Church argued that Orthodox Conciliarism (all Bishops being equal) would lead to division, since there would be no “leader.” The Orthodox teaching is that only Christ is the “leader” (and servant), and all Bishops being equal means that no one of them can unilateraly change anything about the Church as a whole.

Clearly, almost all division has been in revolt against Rome (and from Romans trying to pander to Protestants and Liberation Theologists and “the youth” and perpetually dissatisified reformers.) And now we have scam artists and misguided souls saying nonsense like “you don’t even have to believe in Chrst to be a Christian, or “Mohammad was a Christian, Jesus was a Muslim, it’s all the same.”

Anyway, I have faith that eventually most believers will see things the same way, and genuine Christians can be in communion again.

Also, I guess you and I have a different understanding of “The Church”. I mean a real body of believers, in communion with each other, with a tradition of apostolic succesion. It seems like you mean the usual Western idea of any group that claims to preach the Gospel. I mean I think that’s what you mean.

Re: “the Holy Spirit reveals his word, makes it comprehensible to the believer”

But Christ chose disciples and Aposles for a reason.

Acts of the Apostles Chapter 8:

“Now an angel of the Lord spoke to Philip, saying, “Arise and go toward the south along the road which goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza.” This is desert. So he arose and went.

“And behold, a man of Ethiopia, a eunuch of great authority under Candace the queen of the Ethiopians, who had charge of all her treasury, and had come to Jerusalem to worship, was returning. And sitting in his chariot, he was reading Isaiah the prophet.

“Then the Spirit said to Philip, “Go near and overtake this chariot.” So Philip ran to him, and heard him reading the prophet Isaiah, and said, “Do you understand what you are reading?”

“And he said, “How can I, unless someone guides me?” And he asked Philip to come up and sit with him.”

In other words, “the Holy Spirit reveals his word, makes it comprehensible to the believer” through the Church, which existed before The New Testament.

zee June 22nd, 2008 at 5:24 pm

Hi Akira,
You are far more well versed in this than I am, and thus, I can’t comment one way or another, but you’ve given much food for thought. But I confess, I still prefer to be out here in the wilderness than in the embrace of any church, stubborn fool that I am.

Leave a Reply