Road Sassy

From Planck’s Constant

Black Muslims a greater threat than al-Qaeda

March 9, 2006 — WASHINGTON - The head of Islamic chaplains in the New York City Department of Correction said in a recent speech that the “greatest terrorists in the world occupy the White House,” Jews control the media, and Muslims are being tortured in Manhattan jails.

The outlandish remarks were made by one of the city’s most prominent Islamic leaders, Imam Umar Abdul-Jalil, the executive director of ministerial services for the city Department of Correction. He spoke at a conference of Islamic leaders in Tucson, Ariz., and was secretly recorded by the counterterrorism organization The Investigative Project .

The recordings capture Abdul-Jalil - speaking at two separate symposiums on Islam in America held by the Muslim Students Association on April 15 and 16 last year - making incendiary charges and espousing extremist views. Abdul-Jalil, 56, who is also imam of the Masjid Sabur mosque in Harlem, initially denied making the comments - but later admitted to The Post that the tape was most likely accurate and said his words are being “taken out of context.”…

As I mentioned earlier in 17% of americans are ok with DPW ports deal my estimate is that 80% of blacks are anti-semitic; much of it due to propaganda like Leonard Jeffries identifies Jews as principal planners, financiers and organizers of the Atlantic slave trade and the rantings of the racist lunatic Louis Farrakhan^***.

Certainly, none of this should surprise us; we all recall Imam Intikab Habib, the FDNY Chaplain who resigned after expressing doubts about 9/11 and Imam Warith Deen Umar, the former chief Muslim chaplain barred from the state prison system, after it was reported he was expressing support for the 9/11 terrorists. Actually that last phrase in bold italics needs to be translated from media-speak and politically correct truthiness to actual statement of fact: after it was reported he was recruiting terrorists for al-Qaeda. More MSM white-wash at Michelle Malkin.

All Muslims are a threat to Western Civilization, but black Muslims are a greater threat by virtue of the fact that they do not even need to set up sleeper cells - they already live amongst us accepted as Americans!

And who do you think black muslims will be voting for?

Related Reading:
Does Obama campaign email indicate illegal electioneering in Ohio mosques?
Fund Terrorists/Fund Barack

^***Farrakhan endorses Obama

[Note: I am looking for the link to the Obama logo gif. above. If anyone knows who created it please leave link in comments)

The idea of Scottish muslims seems a tad incongruous. Though it might be one step towards civility if they traded their billowing tent garb for a kilt, the picture that conjures up is exceedingly absurd. But, typical of all muslims who travel to the West, they do not like the country that has provided them sanctuary. And typical of muslims , they find freedom more oppressive than sharia law.

So why do they travel from their precious sharia shackled homelands to the unfettered West?

Two Muslims supporters of “violent jihad” discussed setting up a secret Islamic state in a remote part of Scotland, a court heard today.

Away from the prying eyes of the authorities, it would provide a safe haven for those who felt “oppressed”, jurors were told.

It would also be run according to Sharia law and eventually be used as a base to “discreetly train” for attacks against non-believers.
advertisement

The only drawback Aabid Khan allegedly identified was the availability of weapons.

(source)

I once had a customer whose company did work in Saudi Arabia. I’m not sure what the particular installation was, something to do with oil, but the man had just returned from there and relayed how ludicrous the entire trip had been.

He had been called back because the Arabs whose job it was to run this operation were freaking out , claiming the equipment was faulty. Guess what? They hadn’t turned it on. That simple and that stupid.
So now we have a planet full of parasitical muslims using Western technology that their culture was too bereft of imagination or genius to create. The phrase, “Pearls before swine”, has never had a more pellucid evocation of it’s meaning than when applied to the gifts and bounty, capital and labor, good will and generosity that the West has carelessy and foolishly laid at the feet of the muslim world. ( We won’t go into the extortions, bribes and payoffs that have added to this horrendous waste of US treasure.)

Anecdotes abound of the unceasing incompetence exhibited by arabs and muslims. The following account that provides the narrative for these images only further reinforces the verity thereof.

The brand spanking new Airbus 340-600, the largest passenger airplane ever built, sat in its hangar in Toulouse, France without a single hour of airtime. Enter the Arab flight crew of Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies (ADAT) to conduct pre-delivery tests on the ground, such as engine runups, prior to delivery to Etihad Airways in Abu Dhabi. The date was November 15, 2007.

The ADAT crew taxied the A340-600 to the run-up area. Then they took all four engines to takeoff power with a virtually empty aircraft. Not having read the run-up manuals, they had no clue just how light an empty A340-600 really is.

The takeoff warning horn was blaring away in the cockpit because they had all 4 engines at full power. The aircraft computers thought they were trying to takeoff but it had not been configured properly (flaps/slats, etc.) Then one of the ADAT crew decided to pull the circuit breaker on the Ground Proximity Sensor to silence the alarm.

[...]

The extent of injuries to the crew is unknown, for there has been a news blackout in the major media in France and elsewhere. Coverage of the story was deemed insulting to Moslem Arabs. Finally, the photos are starting to leak out.(emphasis mine)
Read it all …THE TALE OF THE ARAB FLIGHT CREW

Also see Wrecked A340-600 in Toulouse France and France investigates Airbus Crash (via atvJim)

If Islam is permitted to continue it’s seemingly inexorable penetration into the West, there ought to be a new niche market for gynecologists. Between genital mutilation and restoring hymens, they should be able to do a bang up business. And the ReProgressive freaks in America get upset over Christians teaching abstinence.

The annulment of a young Muslim couple’s marriage because the bride was not a virgin has caused anger in France, prompting President Sarkozy’s party to call for a change in the law.

The decision by a court in Lille was condemned by the Government, media, feminists and civil rights organisations after it was reported in a legal journal on Thursday. Patrick Devedjian, leader of the ruling Union for a Popular Movement, said it was unacceptable that the law could be used for religious reasons to repudiate a bride. It must be modified “to put an end to this extremely disturbing situation”, he said.

The case, which had previously gone unreported, involved an engineer in his 30s, named as Mr X, who married Ms Y, a student nurse in her 20s, in 2006. The wedding night party was still under way at the family’s home in Roubaix when the groom came down from the bedroom complaining that his bride was not a virgin. He could not display the blood-stained sheet that is traditionally exhibited as proof of the bride’s “purity”.

Mr X went to court the following morning and was granted a annulment on the grounds that his bride had deceived him on “one of the essential elements” of the marriage. In disgrace with both families, she acknowledged that she had led her groom to believe that she was a virgin when she had already had sexual intercourse. She did not oppose the annulment.
Outrage as French judge annuls Muslim marriage over bride’s virginity lie via Europe News

Sign the Petition

We the American people call on our U.S. Congress to conduct hearings for the purpose of examining extremist materials that have been found in American mosques that:

* exhort Muslims to engage in holy war (jihad) against us;
* incite terror and violence against us;
* call for abolishing our constitutional form of government and replacing it with the theological totalitarianism of strict Islamic law, known as “sharia.”

There have been a number of studies of materials sold or distributed in mosques in America;

These studies have uncovered materials containing information that include calls to jihad (holy war), incitement of terror and violence, and the abolition of our constitutional form of government;

One such study of 100 American mosques found that 75% of these mosques contained such material;

There have also been video and audio recordings of Islamic leaders in America calling for jihad against America, violence against America, and the replacement of America’s constitutional government with Islamic sharia law, such as these words by a leading American imam, “…and even if we go to war brothers and sisters, and one day we will…that’s why you’re commanded to jihad…When Allah demands us to fight, we’re not stopping…”;

Continue Reading »

The issue at stake is the deep gap between the horrific acts of terrorism coming from the Global Jihad groups, and at the same time the propagation coming from the Islamists in eloquent English and in total terms: firstly, that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance hijacked by extremists; secondly, that there is only one Jihad, the spiritual, that means to worship Allah; and thirdly that the Muslims are ordered to fight their enemies only defensively, as they are themselves attacked.

The stunned “free world” witnesses the hideous and atrocious acts of terror, slaughters, beheadings and extreme violence, and at the same time is being told that this is retaliation for the Western colonialism and neo-imperialism, or that these groups are a small minority, mere weeds in a bigger garden. The “free world” is also being told that the acts of terror of the Jihadists and the threats of demolishing modernity of the 21^st century and bringing it back to the 7^th century are only because they defend their lands and their families and their honor against Western aggression.

The question that we must answer is, Jihad defensive or offensive? The answer will be given by analyzing Islamic sources and Muslim exegetes as compared to contemporary Islamist propagators of ideas in the West.

The Arab-Islamic terrorist organizations’ strategy against the “free world” is comprised of two parallel but coordinated arms: Jihad – a holy war against the infidels, and Da`wah – the persuasion and conviction means by which to join Islam. Both are intended to achieve the same objectives; both are used at the same time by different perpetrators and against different targets; both are important stages in the march of Islamic rule; and between both, Da`wah is the more dangerous to the “free world”.

continue reading… Defensive or Offensive Jihad

I have always been viscerally repelled by the idea of a “collective”. The phrase “for the greater good” has the same affect on my nerves as fingernails clawing a chalkboard. Even when I hear groups of people reciting mantras or slogans in unison, I am reminded of brain dead zombies. During my reprobate days as a hippie I remained baffled what the hell the appeal of a commune was. Why the hell would I want strangers sharing the bounty of my work?. Especially when it is an inevitability that a good portion of that group are likey to be slackers who are more than willing to coast on other people’s efforts.

There is nothing that makes me more inclined to put someone’s lights out than their presumption that I owe them, or society, a damn thing. For those who revel in humanity , who get goose bumps at the thought of a group hug, fine and dandy. Find yourself a commune and get your collective rocks off. But don’t you dare impose that farcical construct on the rest of society. I worship free will. I embrace individualism with every fiber of my being. And any group, muslims or progressives, who dare suggest that they own a part of me, can kiss my singular ass.

So, you can imagine how cloying and perverse I find this Obama crowd and their “We Are One” mentality. More so, I find it alarming that this compulsion towards tribalism is a signature feature of muslim/arab society.

I ran into an article that I printed out a few years back on the “arab personality” that, at the time, provided me with much needed insight into the behavior of Islamists. It’s worth reading if you want to get a grasp of the muslims inverted sense of honor as well as their disconcerting similarities to the left. It appears that mohammad (spit) found in Arabs a society quite amenable to the claustrophobic conrtol that Islam exerts, just as the left finds comfort in such fatuous notions of “the greater good” or the idea of sacrificing “the one for the all.”

Here are a couple excerpts:

Arab society is tribal-nomadic, with its outstanding trait being clan loyalty and the anarchy of the desert. Most of its values were shaped in the jahiliyah age before Islam. The important values in Arab conceptions and behavior reflect the pre-Islamic ideals. In the jahiliyah age, “The Arabs did not know Allah and his Messenger and the rules of the religion.”

[...]

Despite their desert character, the city was the Arabs’ focus of change and political activity. Mecca was a center of trade and pilgrimage, since it was on the caravan routes. Religion had secondary importance in jahili society. Religious customs were observed out of tradition and feelings of respect for forefathers, but religion was fetishist, and values were fatalistic, out of absolute faith in the decrees of fate. Secular values took a central place, and were expressed in the concept of manliness (muruwwah), which meant the whole set of traits of a perfect Bedouin. The most important framework was preserving tribal solidarity (`asabiyyah). The tribe was the foundation for personal and group existence.

The critical phenomenon in its importance to Arab-Islamic society is honor. A man’s honor is sharaf. It is flexible, dynamic, and subject to change in accord with his deeds. A woman’s honor is `ird (also meaning her pelvis). In contrast to a man’s honor, this is firm and permanent. The woman grows up with her honor, and her most important role is to preserve it.

The moment that a woman’s honor is lost, it cannot be restored, and a man’s honor is severely wounded. Indeed, Muslim society is based on the virginity of its daughters. Honor is the most important supreme value in Arab life, more important than life itself. A man without honor is considered dead. Hence the saying, “It is better to die with honor than live with humiliation.” A man’s place in the tribe, as well as the tribe’s place among the tribes, was according to the measure of his and its honor. When honor was harmed, shame was caused which originated in public exposure, overt to everyone, a phenomenon which severely humiliated a man. Indeed, the Arab individual is caught up throughout his whole life in intensive activity to avoid shame and advance his honor. The central means for this was vengeance. Honor is restored only when vengeance has been carried out in public and is known to all.

[...]

Tribal tradition and clan loyalty had dominant influence in society. Likewise significant were blood ties within the extended family or the tribe, which determined group loyalties and identifications. Most of these social traits exist to this day, and influence the functioning of Arab society as a primordial system in which symbolic values are more important and esteemed than concrete values and the overall, holistic system of beliefs. This is “a shame society”, in which everyone must behave according to the accepted norms and internalize his own feelings in the system of group behavior.

Continue Reading »

Sphere: Related Content

Can you imagine a group invading the Navajo Reservation, demanding welfare, calling Navajo “kaffir” with a bullhorn, attacking Navajo religious figures and buildings, raping and stealing from Navajo, and calling themselves “Navajo” while disparaging everything about the Navajo, and on and on.

That is exactly what is happening in little England. Just replace the word Navajo above with English.

The Navajo Reservation in Arizona has about 200,000 residents and is half the size of England, which has 50 million. That’s quite a disparate land distribution. Yet England, under a pact with dhimmi traitors like Blair and the Islamist-loving United Nations, accepts hundreds of thousands of Islamonazis each year. Other immigrants just invade illegally. Number of immigrants taken in by the Navajo? None, unless you show you have Navajo ancestry. Ditto for most non-Western countries.
continue reading…Being Muslim: A license to rape, rob and murder

A comment on Bosch Fawstin’s blog:

Bosch, you ease my disdain of mankind in its present state.
People like you are few and far between but when one finds them, life is is not such a burden.
You sketch with words as eloquently and sagaciously as with crayon.
I just love your style and what you have to say!!

4:45 PM

You know blogs like that, don’t you? The blogger writes the words that have been churning inside that you just haven’t been able to express with the clarity and impact your anger and indignation dictates.

For me, it doesn’t take much reading online before I am almost writhing in frustration, spitting mental bullets and ready to tear the first reprogressive or muslim I see a new asshole. If it’s not the Jew-hating, America-loathing, castrated bloggers at Kos, than it is the horror one feels when discovering just how compromised this government is, abetted by soulless harridans like Karen Hughes. Dhimmitude leaves a damn bloody bad taste in my mouth. Reading Bosch Fawstin provides a potent antidote.

Below is an excerpt from one of his latest posts, and if you’ve had your fill of progressives and muslims and are ready to punch a wall, go read it all. Bosch’s words will punch it for you.

‘Moderate’ Muslims have tried to hijack Islam, but they’re too moderate to go up against Islam’s true believers.
If Washington P.C. fought the enemy the way they fight the truth about the enemy…………
We’re always told that it’s an interpretation of Islam that’s the problem.
True. Mohammed’s interpretation.
Islam means peace & saying is believing
We’re at the mercy of a weak religious man moderately defending us against brutal religious men.
‘Peace to whoever follows [right] guidance.’ –Osama bin laden
‘…National Socialist Germany wants peace because of it’s fundamental convictions….Germany needs peace and desires peace….’ –Adolf Hitler
‘Embrace Islam and you shall have peace.’ –Mohammed
Islam makes the enemy tick

Our saying ‘Islam means peace’ gives aid and comfort to the enemy.
What do the most wanted terrorists in the world have in common?
‘Islam means peace’ is the equivalent of ‘Nice doggy…’
The more devout, the more passionately committed a Muslim is to Islam, the more he comes into alignment with Islam’s inherent extremism.
‘Islam means peace’ is a means to our end.
Islam means peace & Terror is the enemy
From Allahu Akbar! to ‘Banzai!’ to ‘Heil Hitler!’ and back to ‘Allahu Akbar!’
These peaceful, moderate Muslims we always hear of and never from, are not peaceful, but cowardly. Silence and inaction does not make one peaceful, does not make one moderate. If a man sees another man beating up a woman on the street and allows it to go on, he’s not being peaceful.
While we keep telling ourselves what Islam means, Muslims keep showing us what Islam means
If Islam is a dove, why are its feathers so easily ruffled when someone says otherwise?
The Swiss Watch. That’s what they do, just like in World War Two.
We cannot be for Islam and for ourselves, but Bush is trying. He need merely take a good, hard look at the enemy’s culture to see that his tolerance and compassion is unilateral. We haven’t even begun to pay for his indifference to the truth about the enemy.
‘Islam means peace’ & words speak louder than actions
We are at the obscene phase in this war where merely citing the direct connection between Islam and terrorism is seen as worse than the connection itself.
The idea that by being honest about Islam’s true nature we will be making enemies of a billion Muslims overlooks the fact that Islam has already identified all non-Muslims, 5 billion of us, as its enemy.
Telling the truth about Islam and making Islam look bad are one and the same, so the truth itself is seen as an enemy of Islam, but since the truth can’t be killed, the truth tellers will be.
Who gets more heat? One who says that Islam is inherently violent or the Muslim who kills him for it?
‘Islam means peace’ and Ground Zero means the Twin Towers.

continue reading…ISLAM vs PEACE

I have been waylaid by some rogue flu bug and thus, have been absent from duty, and I do apologize. As fate would have it, Ligneus has been having connection problems and still is off line. Sitting upright for any length of time is proving to be an uncomfortable experience, so this is when we start digging through those archives.

I give you “Where Are the Watchmen?” from April of ‘06. The question still remains in ‘08.

“In August 2004, a local planning commission in Little Rock, Arkansas, granted The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[3] While the imam, Aquil Hamidullah, says his goal is to create “a clean community, free of alcohol, drugs, and free of gangs,”[4] the implications for U.S. jurisprudence of this and other internal enclaves are greater: while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.”
[...]
The Islamic Center for Human Excellence may seek to segregate schools and offices by gender. The enclave might also exercise broad control upon commerce within its boundaries-provided the economic restrictions did not discriminate against out-of-state interests or create an undue burden upon interstate commerce. But most critically, the enclave could promulgate every internal law-from enforcing strict religious dress codes to banning alcohol possession and music; it could even enforce limits upon religious and political tolerance. Although such concepts are antithetical to a free society, U.S. democracy allows the internal enclave to function beyond the established boundaries of our constitutional framework. At the very least, the permissible parameters of an Islamist enclave are ill defined.”

Hordes of self-righteous illegal mexicans parade like so many pompous little Napoleons while chanting insulting demands, supported by the liberals and the media and a president who apparently has neither the will nor wisdom that conservatives foolishly ascribed to the man. While the Mexican make their claim upon our land, Muslims are appropriating our country. They know the lay of the land, the threats to make, the alliances to grease. They are a cancer mutating through our government, our prisons, our universities and our communities, culling leagues of political sycophants, networking like the most adept American sales pro, bartering lies for concessions, embraced by a body of politicians whom I can only describe as decayed in will, spirit and mind; a passel of febrile and castrated men whose convictions are dry rotted - shredding at the merest wisp of a breeze - unable to support an ideal nor a promise.

I’m weary with the reading of it and the writing of it. Conservatives have to move against all the existing limitations and encroachments on free speech being imposed under so called hate speech laws. Any and all other convolutions of the law that the priesthood of liberal judges can conjure up to suppress opposition have to be firmly routed and defeated. If we can’t gain that ground back, we lose it all.
We have to be free to lawfully monitor every frigging land deal, every local election, every elected or nominated member on school boards, every bit of curriculum our kids see. We have to somehow raise enough awareness of the kind of deals and concessions that are being made and put these subterranean Muslim political machinations above the radar so that all of us know that a mosque is proposed or state-church law is to be violated , or 8 weeks of Islamic studies have been placed in the curriculum.

We have got to take the battle back to them and by them I mean the left and Islam. Be it Soros or Socialists or John Dean or Sheik Mo-frigging-hammad - they will destroy America. The riots that we see in France by a lazy pathetic and cowardly populace will soon be our plight. Maybe by then the American flag will be completely banned. Should it come to the point where we allow that to happen then we don’t deserve to fly her any longer. There is no courage or vision left in government and all of the men worthy of leading this country are being killed in Iraq.

For what?

So the rest of us can just continue to get our teeth kicked out by libs and muslims and their trained media flunkies? They fight and we sleep.
But to tell you the truth, I don’t sleep all that well these days anymore.

We need watchmen on the walls folks.

Where Are the Watchmen?

ESCAPE FROM A BROOKLYN MOSQUE

By

Bos Smith

Bos Smith in front of Masjid At-Taqwa

Don’t snap a photo of the Masjid At-Taqwa in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn unless you want to be hauled away by a group of angry Muslims in Islamic attire to the basement of the facility where a group of twenty “security guards” in karate suits will interrogate you.

This might sound preposterous.

But it happened on Saturday, April 24, at 3:00 in the afternoon.

Ali Kareem, the head of security for Siraj Wahaj’s mosque, conducted the grilling. A small, muscular man with a wispy black beard that has been dyed red with henna, Kareem demanded to know the reason why a trio of kafirs had dared to photograph the building on a public street without securing his permission.

He further insisted on securing our identities and obtaining our motives for such a violation of Islamic space.

Being surrounded by a group of militant guards in a mosque basement from which there is no means of escape is not a comforting place to be for a Wall Street financier.

We tried to explain that we found the neighborhood with its halal meat vendors and food stores; Islamic dress shops, featuring the latest styles in burqas and hijabs; Muslim souvenir outlets, replete with bumper stickers stating “Don’t Be Caught Dead Without Islam”; and Middle Eastern restaurants offering a variety of goat dishes to be rather quaint and interesting.

This explanation was not sufficient.

Kareem was impatient and did not want a detailed explanation of the reason for our excursion (simple sight-seeing) or a graphic account of the sights we had seen and photographed.

“I ask the questions here,” he said, “and you provide the answers.”

Realizing that we were in a bit of a pickle, my companion explained that we were interested in various religions and knew Siraj Wahaj, the imam of the mosque, was a prominent Muslim figure whom we would like to interview for a news outlet.

This didn’t work too well since we could not produce a business card from a wacko blog, let alone credentials from a national publication.

At last, we blurted out that we were admirers of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad (Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him) and wanted to obtain information about conversion. We were even knowledgeable enough to blurt out “Salaam” and “Allahu akbar.”

The last utterance seemed to be the “Open Sesame” that got us out of the basement and back to Bedford Street, where we managed to take a picture of the mosque before hailing a cab and making a getaway.

The experience was disconcerting. Surely, anyone who takes a picture of St. Patrick’s Cathedral or the Riverside Church is not hauled off to a basement for questioning by a threatening figure in a karate uniform and a band of Ninjas.

What is taking place within Masjid At-Taqwa?

And what about Siraj Wahaj, the celebrated imam of this mosque who claims to be a moderate?

Continue Reading »

“I am fed up with being under the thumb of this population which is destroying us, destroying our country and imposing its acts,” the star of ‘And God created woman’ and ‘Contempt’ said.

And for saying the truth, speaking mere words, Miss Bardot faces prosecution. And no one cares. It is interesting that the left found Bridgette Bardot very useful in her role as a defender of animals, but they don’t seem to be able to muster up much support for Miss Bardot in her defense of humans. Ooops, silly me. Progressives always prefer animals to humans. Given that they, and muslims, wish to reduce civilization to the level of barn yard animals, one is not too surprised.

Brigitte Bardot is only saying what the majority of French are saying. Do they have enough courts to prosecute all these millions? Besides, what they’re saying is not the fruit of their imagination, it’s just facts that even the blinds can’t deny.

Nicolas Sarkozy himself called muslims, thugs, during their islamic Intefada in Paris and other French cities, and his tough stand boosted his popularity, and contributed to his election.

It is also worth noting that the French Minister of Justice, Rachida Dati, is a muslim.

Bardot has previously said France is being invaded by sheep-slaughtering Muslims and published a book attacking immigrants and the unemployed, in which she also lamented the “Islamisation of France”.

Sons of Apes and Pigs

Jihad Watch reports a muslim blogger’s disgruntlement over Kevin Weakley’s “List of Things That Offend Islam”. As usual, and much like their their leftist kin, this particular muslim whiner blogger does not address the issues presented but instead asserts that Mr. Weakley is a terrorist magnet deserving of a bullet.

Isn’t it amazing how both muslims and lefties alike can simultaneously invoke peace while inciting violence? Perhaps they are all bi-polar or something…..

I recommend going over to Kevin’s blog and adding to the list. Hell, in for a penny, in for a pound.

The List of Things That Offend Muslims

This list is a work in progress. I welcome suggestions. Anyone who has more items to add to the list, post them in the comments.

The intent of the list is to illustrate the futility of the multicultural approach to Islam. Sharia law demands submission not only from Muslims, but from non-Muslims as well. This makes respectful coexistence nearly impossible with Muslims in Infidel lands. The examples below serve as reminder that submitting to one complaint or another only emboldens Muslims to seek to further their ultimate goal of establishing sharia.

The West needs to come to grips with this fact and start standing up for our God-given rights of free speech, free expression and freedom of religion, lest we surrender those rights to a theocratic movement bent on removing our Constitutional freedoms that we hold dear. In this case, our tolerance will lead to intolerance.

Fitna has been released and, as expected, the denials from appeasers,dhimmis, and muslims are profuse. The most common seem to be assertions that the koranic texts used were taken out of context, a claim hard to substantiate given that so many imans are delivering messages totally congruant with the passages cited.

The fact that 15 minutes of koranic verse and preaching should merit the cacophony Wilder’s piece has been met with should give skeptics pause in and of itself. The fact that government officials tuck their tails between their legs as they mouth abject apologies to impotent and blustering religious figures is worthy of contempt. The anticipated violence has yet to materialize, but given that the violence that attended the publication of the mohammad cartoons was actually an orchestrated Iman puppet show, it is not surprising that those imans realized such strategies are counter productive to maintaining the charade that islam is peace.

As far as I am concerned, their attempts to suppress free speech coupled with their arrogant demand that “insults” to Islam be criminalized are far more insidious than the threat of bloodshed.

The comments on the Fitna website offer a fair sampling of the arguments being bandied about and the site, What Do You Believe?, offers a lexicon of typical muslim defense.