Road Sassy

islam erases life

I really loathe the term “war on terror”. Apply to that the typical western sensibilities and you have folks believing that the gravest threats from islam are wild eyed jihadists. They are actually the lesser of evils that parade about in the name of Islam. Islam itself, a theological and political system whose ultimate manifestation is theummah, is the enemy and political islam, - the soft jihad - has devastated more of the west than the media will ever acknowledge.
From The Midnight Sun….

It happened in Lebanon and it’s going to happen in a myriad of other places; the Muslims gain the numerical and then the political advantage and things start changing. Sarajevo is paying the price for the rise to power of a brutal, torturing, genocidal Muslim warlord thug.
[...]
The city has effectively been ethnically cleansed and is now 90 percent Muslim, obviously no longer friendly to non-Muslim residents.

In Australia, former immigration minister, Kevin Andrews, has been roasted alive for wanting to extend a welcome to Christian Iraqi refugees. And yet, the left hegemony has no problem at all with welcoming in huge hordes of Muslim immigrants. What’s the agenda here?

Meanwhile, 30,000 Iraqis are on their way to America, a figure to reach 60,000 in the next few years. Guess where to? Michigan (should we start calling it Mecca-ghan?). How many does it take to reach critical mass? Who would like to bet they aren’t Christian refugees from persecution?
Read it all….BEYOND CRITICAL MASS: SARAJEVO AND MICHIGAN

At the same post, commenter Mike W left some information that is so very startling in it’s simple conveyance of facts that I reproduce it in full here.

islam erases life

Islam as a System

Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called “religious rights.”
When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to “the reasonable” Muslim demands for their
“religious rights,” they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007).

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply.

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris — car burnings, etc.). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam — Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of “Dar-es-Salaam” — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

“Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel”. — Leon Uris, “The Haj”

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.

And Islamists are here with plans, lots and lots of plans…

• As the West Sleeps, Islamists Work on Establishing a Worldwide Islamic State (Part I of II)
• Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America
  
• The Muslim Brotherhood “Project”
  
• The Muslim Brotherhood “Project” (Continued)
  
• The Origins of the Muslim Brotherhood “Project”
  
• The Muslim Brotherhood’s Infiltration of the West
  
• Muslim Mayors coming to a city near you
  
• The Muslim Brotherhood’s US Network
• Are Islamist Groups Trying to Influence the White House Race?
• Muslim Politicians in America (2006) (PDF)
• A rare look at secretive Brotherhood in America — chicagotribune.com

Debating about Islam, Part 2

by Bill Warner at Political Islam.com

THERE ARE DIFFERENT KINDS OF ISLAM
The differences in the different kinds of Islam are due to religion, not politics. Take the Sunni/Shia split, the largest division in Islam. Both Sunnis and Shias completely agree on how to treat kafirs and jihad. All Muslim subscribe to one of five schools of the Sharia and the Sharia’s position regarding kafirs and jihad is the nearly the same for all the schools.

The only big difference is whether to use violent jihad or peaceful jihad against the kafirs.

HADITH—SOME OF THOSE AREN’T REAL
If you quote a hadith to a Muslim and they don’t like it, they will say, “Well, some of those hadiths are not acceptable (or true or some other disclaimer).” And that is true. Actually, when a Muslim says that, they are practicing taqiyya, sacred deception and duality. If it is a hadith, then a Muslim cannot be denied the right to follow it. It is Sunna.

The hadiths from Bukhari and Muslim are the creme de la creme of hadiths. When Bukhari made his collection, he threw out 99% of those he found. Those 99% are the unsure ones, the other 1% which are used here are authoritative.

THE MYTH OF THE ARABS, ABRAHAM AND ISHMAEL
The core of the myth is told in the Koran about how Adam built the Kabah at Mecca. It was the first house of worship. Then Abraham brought Ishmael to Mecca, prepared to perform the sacrifice demanded by God. Ishmael was left in Mecca with his mother, Hagar.

Continue Reading »

I didn’t think much of any faith based initiative under Bush. I am horrified that Barack Obama has endorsed it. Even more ominous, he intends to expand the list of faiths to whom it applies.

Christians I can handle. They have yet to threaten to kill me when I offend them. Real Christians (as opposed to the pseudo _christian left) have a healthy respect for free will. More so, they have a healthy respect for life. Islam respects neither, in fact, muslims respect nothing outside of Islam, least of all the right to worship any god, or no god at all.

Given Obama’s seemingly natural affinity for totalitarian systems, I clearly expect him to gravitate towards the autocratic dictates of Islam. And expanding faith based initiatives will open the door ever wider for Islam. More to the point, it isn’t as if they are a body of impoverished believers, hurting for money. Islam has a steady revenue of Wahabbi and Saud money flowing into their coffers. Let them fund their own freaking initiatives.The idea of adding American tax dollars is tantamount to handing ammunition to the enemy.

Islam is quietly crossing the threshold of our schools in this country while hysterical muslims scream “racism’ anytime parents protest. The lamentable and subversive ACLU does absolutely nothing about it. But of course, you have to grow a pair to confront Islam and the dhimmi ACLU are far to used to the easy victories they have had suppressing Christianity.

If American remains indifferent, they’ll be longing for the days when Christianity was the only religion they had to contend with. Don’t believe me. Start reading the blogs and news out of Great Britain. Below is only one small example.

Two schoolboys were given detention after refusing to kneel down and ‘pray to Allah’ during a religious education lesson. [snip] “But not only did they have to pray, the teacher had gone into the class and made them watch a short film and then said ‘we are now going out to pray to Allah’. “Then two boys got detention and all the other children missed their refreshment break because of the teacher. “Not only was it forced upon them, my daughter was told off for not doing it right. [snip] Parents said that their children were made to bend down on their knees on prayer mats which the RE teacher had got out of her cupboard and they were also told to wear Islamic headgear during the lesson on Tuesday afternoon.
Continue reading….
Forcing children to pray to Allah and promoting sharia

Image Source

Seventh Circuit Vacates Holy Land Foundation Opinion, Grants Rehearing

On June 16, the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the opinion of a three-judge panel, rendered December 28, 2007, which overturned the landmark $156 million judgment against the Holy Land Foundation (HLF), other Islamic charities in the U.S., and an alleged Hamas fundraiser. The case arose out of the 1996 murder of David Boim, a 17-year-old American citizen, who was killed in a Hamas terrorist attack in the West Bank. David’s parents sued men who were directly involved in the murder; the Holy Land Foundation (HLF); the American Muslim Society, also known as the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP); the Quranic Literacy Institute (QLI); the United Association for Studies and Research (UASR); Saleh, the alleged Hamas fundraiser; and others (see this summary judgement order from the first trial for the complete list). The June 16 decision will result in a rehearing of the case by the entire court in the near future, thus giving the Boim family a second chance at the appellate level.

I have less and less hope that this castrated government will rid this country of the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR and all other islamic front groups. But at least there is this, small as it is. May they nail these bastards to the wall.

The staccato messages of surrender fill the airwaves, intoned by sonorous pundits, oily politicians, fat and sated academicians, and a variety of global vermin.

…the billionaire “philanthropist” George Soros, insisting that the War on Terror has “done more harm than good….Francis Fukuyama saw the root problem in the Muslims’ “alienation from modernity.”…Madeleine Albright….declared that it is “important to listen to what others are telling you”…Senator Joe Biden argued for debt relief and funding of education programs in Muslim countries….GOP ex-Senator Warren Rudman argued that “America and our allies must address global poverty…

On and on they drone, each empty word faithfully reported by lapdog journalists, each word an act of obeisance to Islam, words piled upon words, marching in cadence to dhimmitude. And if they are silent for but one moment, you can hear the jackals of jihad howling. Jackals have little use for words.

Islam does not think in sound bites. They think in decades. They think in centuries. This is one template of their progress.

1. The Muslim diaspora in the Western world, while formally denouncing “terrorism,” will accept and condone religious justification for acts that effectively challenge the monopoly on violence of the non-Muslim host-state.

2. The Muslim diaspora will use a highly developed infrastructure of organized religion in the host-state-a network of mosques, Islamic centers and Muslim organizations-and deploy it either as a tool of direct political pressure in support of terrorist goals (e.g., British Muslims vis-a-vis Rushdie), or else as a means of deception and manipulation in order to diminish the ability of the host-society to defend itself (e.g., CAIR vis-a-vis post-9-11 America).

3. The non-Muslim establishment-public figures, politicians, journalists, academic analysts-will seek to appease the Muslim diaspora, or else it will shy away from confronting the problem of the immigrants’ attitudes and impact by pretending that it does not exist.

And the pundits and politicians keep turning the earth over. Like worms, they prepare the ground for the seeds of the West’s destruction. One such worm is George Soros. George has a template too. It is very compatible with Islam’s.

You tell me. How do you like the fact that Soros funded a project to instruct your local police in the sensitivities of Muslims?

… Northeastern University’s project known as the Promising Practices Guide: Developing Partnerships Between Law Enforcement and American Muslim, Arab, and Sikh Communities .
[...]
The Guide ’s three authors (one of them a Muslim) have an eccentric view of what are “most dangerous threats in this war.” They are to be found not in the ideology of jihad but “in the successful propagation of anger and fear directed at unfamiliar cultures and people” among us Americans. The problem is not with the Muslims who perpetrate terrorist crimes but in the bias against Muslims that is supposedly rampant in today’s America…
[...]

By funding the ” Guide ” Soros has confirmed yet again that he is a visionary who sees immigration as an essential tool of revolutionary change. His metaphysical concept of Muslims’ victimhood based on their exclusion from the society demands the change of the society, not of the Muslim mindset. That is the meaning of his claim that the War on Terror “creates innocent victims and that helps the terrorists.” By encouraging the emergence of a subculture of hostile aliens within America, he promotes the growth of an alternative social and political structure of which the potential for further growth of Islamic terrorism is but one consequence.

JIHAD’S FELLOW TRAVELERS

[ed:my bold]

Yes, “terrorism is but one consequence.” Those familiar with this blog would agree that terrorism is actually one of the more benign components of Islam. Physical death is swift. Sharia is a prolonged and painful death.

George Soros is but one of many worms turning. I would say to you, so is Barack Hussein Obama, a man Soros has found worthy of investing in. A man who would be president of our country. A man who has said the following about Islam.

Continue Reading »

The issue at stake is the deep gap between the horrific acts of terrorism coming from the Global Jihad groups, and at the same time the propagation coming from the Islamists in eloquent English and in total terms: firstly, that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance hijacked by extremists; secondly, that there is only one Jihad, the spiritual, that means to worship Allah; and thirdly that the Muslims are ordered to fight their enemies only defensively, as they are themselves attacked.

The stunned “free world” witnesses the hideous and atrocious acts of terror, slaughters, beheadings and extreme violence, and at the same time is being told that this is retaliation for the Western colonialism and neo-imperialism, or that these groups are a small minority, mere weeds in a bigger garden. The “free world” is also being told that the acts of terror of the Jihadists and the threats of demolishing modernity of the 21^st century and bringing it back to the 7^th century are only because they defend their lands and their families and their honor against Western aggression.

The question that we must answer is, Jihad defensive or offensive? The answer will be given by analyzing Islamic sources and Muslim exegetes as compared to contemporary Islamist propagators of ideas in the West.

The Arab-Islamic terrorist organizations’ strategy against the “free world” is comprised of two parallel but coordinated arms: Jihad – a holy war against the infidels, and Da`wah – the persuasion and conviction means by which to join Islam. Both are intended to achieve the same objectives; both are used at the same time by different perpetrators and against different targets; both are important stages in the march of Islamic rule; and between both, Da`wah is the more dangerous to the “free world”.

continue reading… Defensive or Offensive Jihad

Can you imagine a group invading the Navajo Reservation, demanding welfare, calling Navajo “kaffir” with a bullhorn, attacking Navajo religious figures and buildings, raping and stealing from Navajo, and calling themselves “Navajo” while disparaging everything about the Navajo, and on and on.

That is exactly what is happening in little England. Just replace the word Navajo above with English.

The Navajo Reservation in Arizona has about 200,000 residents and is half the size of England, which has 50 million. That’s quite a disparate land distribution. Yet England, under a pact with dhimmi traitors like Blair and the Islamist-loving United Nations, accepts hundreds of thousands of Islamonazis each year. Other immigrants just invade illegally. Number of immigrants taken in by the Navajo? None, unless you show you have Navajo ancestry. Ditto for most non-Western countries.
continue reading…Being Muslim: A license to rape, rob and murder

I have been waylaid by some rogue flu bug and thus, have been absent from duty, and I do apologize. As fate would have it, Ligneus has been having connection problems and still is off line. Sitting upright for any length of time is proving to be an uncomfortable experience, so this is when we start digging through those archives.

I give you “Where Are the Watchmen?” from April of ‘06. The question still remains in ‘08.

“In August 2004, a local planning commission in Little Rock, Arkansas, granted The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[3] While the imam, Aquil Hamidullah, says his goal is to create “a clean community, free of alcohol, drugs, and free of gangs,”[4] the implications for U.S. jurisprudence of this and other internal enclaves are greater: while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.”
[...]
The Islamic Center for Human Excellence may seek to segregate schools and offices by gender. The enclave might also exercise broad control upon commerce within its boundaries-provided the economic restrictions did not discriminate against out-of-state interests or create an undue burden upon interstate commerce. But most critically, the enclave could promulgate every internal law-from enforcing strict religious dress codes to banning alcohol possession and music; it could even enforce limits upon religious and political tolerance. Although such concepts are antithetical to a free society, U.S. democracy allows the internal enclave to function beyond the established boundaries of our constitutional framework. At the very least, the permissible parameters of an Islamist enclave are ill defined.”

Hordes of self-righteous illegal mexicans parade like so many pompous little Napoleons while chanting insulting demands, supported by the liberals and the media and a president who apparently has neither the will nor wisdom that conservatives foolishly ascribed to the man. While the Mexican make their claim upon our land, Muslims are appropriating our country. They know the lay of the land, the threats to make, the alliances to grease. They are a cancer mutating through our government, our prisons, our universities and our communities, culling leagues of political sycophants, networking like the most adept American sales pro, bartering lies for concessions, embraced by a body of politicians whom I can only describe as decayed in will, spirit and mind; a passel of febrile and castrated men whose convictions are dry rotted - shredding at the merest wisp of a breeze - unable to support an ideal nor a promise.

I’m weary with the reading of it and the writing of it. Conservatives have to move against all the existing limitations and encroachments on free speech being imposed under so called hate speech laws. Any and all other convolutions of the law that the priesthood of liberal judges can conjure up to suppress opposition have to be firmly routed and defeated. If we can’t gain that ground back, we lose it all.
We have to be free to lawfully monitor every frigging land deal, every local election, every elected or nominated member on school boards, every bit of curriculum our kids see. We have to somehow raise enough awareness of the kind of deals and concessions that are being made and put these subterranean Muslim political machinations above the radar so that all of us know that a mosque is proposed or state-church law is to be violated , or 8 weeks of Islamic studies have been placed in the curriculum.

We have got to take the battle back to them and by them I mean the left and Islam. Be it Soros or Socialists or John Dean or Sheik Mo-frigging-hammad - they will destroy America. The riots that we see in France by a lazy pathetic and cowardly populace will soon be our plight. Maybe by then the American flag will be completely banned. Should it come to the point where we allow that to happen then we don’t deserve to fly her any longer. There is no courage or vision left in government and all of the men worthy of leading this country are being killed in Iraq.

For what?

So the rest of us can just continue to get our teeth kicked out by libs and muslims and their trained media flunkies? They fight and we sleep.
But to tell you the truth, I don’t sleep all that well these days anymore.

We need watchmen on the walls folks.

Where Are the Watchmen?

Islam is a complete system that encompasses every aspect of life. It’s tentacles intrude in every imaginable way, dictating everything from personal hygeine, friendships, marraige, family life, personal hobbies.; all of it is controlled by the tenets of islam.

What most Americans can not seem to grasp is that Islam is a political beast as well. From hearth to government, Islam sacrifices the sovereign status of the individual in service to the ummah. Much like the socialist Obama, where the individual is expected to live for the greater good (gag me) in service to the state.

Islam is based upon the principles of dualism and submission. However, you don’t have to be a Muslim to invoke them. Obama has closely aligned himself with Rev. Wright’s “Black Liberation Theology”, BLT.

The very basis of BLT is dualism. God is seen as being purely dualistic; a political creature who will support blacks and hurt whites. It is not the division into two categories that makes for dualism. A study of high blood pressure differences between blacks and whites is not dualism. Dualism, instead, divides and creates ethical and social asymmetries. As an example, Islam divides all humans into Muslim and kafir and posits that Muslims should rule over kafirs and that kafirs can be treated as sub-human if it will advance Islam.

[...]

BLT holds that crime in the black neighborhoods is due to the CIA bringing in crack cocaine and the AIDS virus. Blacks are believed to have no responsibility. Blacks even temper criticism of rap hate-speech by saying that it the fault of the rich white record producers.

The parallel with Islam is exact. When Mohammed attacked the poor Meccan kafirs and killed them, it was the kafirs’ fault. They had opposed Islam and were guilty of the first offense. Any opposition to BLT is due to inherent bigotry on the part of the white critic, by definition. Therefore, the white man/kafir is due his fair share of abuse by the pious imam or BLT preacher.
Islam is always the victim. Being the victim is the perfect cover for crime and hate…

from… Obama and Dualism

We have been so thoroughly betrayed by this current president who barely spits out the word islamofascist before retreating with the alacrity of a well trained dhimmi. Always the question posed is, “are we safe?” And simply because an act of “terror” has not visited this shore since 2001, the very false conclusion that we are thus, safe, is perpetuated. But we haven’t been safe for a very long time.

No, as of yet, there are no beheadings in America, though honor killings, genital mutilation, forced marriages are occurring with little comment from the media. There isn’t anything nearly as flagrant as the wholesale slaughter committed in Allah’s name in countries throughout the world. There are not, as of  yet,  muslim no-go zones in America as exist in England and France.

But as I write these words liberty lays bleeding. Freedom is in exile, seeking asylum, but fewer and fewer countries will grant her sanctuary. Thought police roam the corridors of “justice” and academia, vandalizing the constitution, rummaging through history, desecrating America with the graffiti of their revisionist lies.

It is critical that Americans come to understand political islam, and then see how it melds so seamlessly with the ideological matrix from which Barack Hussein Obama speaks. The excerpts above and below are from the site Political Islam, one that I ask you to post about and to email to all those who have an ear to hear.

From… The Study of Political Islam

Endless ink has been wasted on trying to answer the question of what is Islam? Is Islam the religion of peace? Or is the true Islam a radical ideology? Is a moderate Muslim the real Muslim?
This reminds a scientist of the old arguments about light. Is light a particle or is light a wave? The arguments went back and forth. Quantum mechanics gave us the answer. Light is dualistic; it is both a particle and a wave. It depends upon the circumstances as to which quality manifests. Islam functions in the same manner.
Our first clue about the dualism is in the Koran, which is actually two books, the Koran of Mecca (early) and the Koran of Medina (later). The insight into the logic of the Koran comes from the large numbers of contradictions in it. On the surface, Islam resolves these contradictions by resorting to “abrogation”. This means that the verse written later supersedes the earlier verse. But in fact, since the Koran is considered by Muslims to be the perfect word of Allah, both verses are sacred and true. The later verse is “better,” but the earlier verse cannot be wrong since Allah is perfect. This is the foundation of dualism. Both verses are “right.” Both sides of the contradiction are true in dualistic logic. The circumstances govern which verse is used.
For example:
(Koran of Mecca) 73:10: Listen to what they [unbelievers] say with patience, and leave them with dignity.
From tolerance we move to the ultimate intolerance, not even the Lord of the Universe can stand the unbelievers:

(Koran of Medina) 8:12: Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the unbelievers’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!”
All of Western logic is based upon the law of contradiction—if two things contradict, then at least one of them is false. But Islamic logic is dualistic; two things can contradict each other and both are true.
No dualistic system may be measured by one answer. This is the reason that the arguments about what constitutes the “real” Islam go on and on and are never resolved. A single right answer does not exist.

continue reading…The Study of Political Islam

It matters little if Barack Hussein Obama attended a madrassa or not. The politics of the the left and it’s stepchild, black liberation theology, resonate on a core, essential level with Islam.

European Muslims are presently exercising the political and cultural muscle that their American counterparts are working towards. A democrat/socialist in the White House will accelerate their progress. Obama in the White House will guarantee it.

Reproduced in it’s entirety from Political Islam, a publication that I strongly recommend that you subscribe to.

Islam and Black Liberation Theology

Bill Warner

Center for the Study of Political Islam

Barack Obama has closely aligned himself with Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Black Liberation Theology (BLT). When viewed from the Christian point-of-view, BLT is a strange creed, but when seen from the standpoint of Islam, there is a very strong parallel.

Islam and BLT are theologies that have a political goal of making all politics submit to their demands. Submission is the political goal.
Islam and BLT are both based upon the principle of duality. The Koran divides up humanity into Muslims and the kafirs (unbelievers). BLT has a god that divides humanity into blacks and whites. But the duality is not the division, but a complete separation that is ethical, political, cultural and religious. The believer has nothing in common with the kafir/white. Allah loves the Muslim and a black god loves the blacks.

Allah preaches violence against the kafirs and helps Muslims to kill them. The Koran says that cruelty and hatred of the kafir is a sacred duty for Muslims.

BLT does not preach violence against whites, but excuses and justifies it. BLT also justifies black crime as a legal way for oppressed blacks to strike back at the white oppressors. It sees a rapist or killer of whites as a revolutionary committing a legitimate act of a just war. Here we have a quote from James Cone, the father of BLT:

“What we need is the divine love as expressed in black power, which is the power of blacks to destroy their oppressors, here and now, by any and all means at their disposal” [James Cone, A Black Theology of Liberation, p. 70]

Neither Islam nor BLT ever acknowledges the suffering of its enemies. Jihad has killed over 270 million kafirs over the last 1400 years, but there has never been any acknowledgment of the destruction of kafirs. In Mohammed’s official biography, the Sira, there are hundreds of pages devoted to jihad against the kafirs. There is not one time when Mohammed expressed remorse about the beheading, torturing, killing, raping and robbery of the kafirs. Indeed, there are many occasions when he laughed at the kafirs’ suffering.

The duality of total separateness from the kafir/white creates an ethical position. Ethics become dualistic. The kafir/white is treated differently from the “brother/sister”. Since Allah/black God hates and plots against kafirs/whites there is no empathy with the victims of the aggression. There is no remorse and, therefore, there is never an apology. There is nothing to apologize for. Allah/black God wanted them dead, so there is no need to weep.

Continue Reading »

Let’s get her a footbath. No, let’s change the gym schedule to accommodate her need for “modesty”. While we are at it, we’ll reorient her dorm room to face Mecca. No, not good enough? OK, we’ll behead an infidel a day and send her the video to enjoy with morning coffee, after she prays, of course. She and allah can share a good chuckle at the stupidity of the dhimmi Americans who work so hard to make their caliphate dreams come true.

Terrorist Threat by Muslim Female Student Against UIC [Candace de Russy]

Yesterday, reports former police chief Jim Kouri, the FBI arrested Mahtab Shirani, a Muslim woman enrolled at the University of Illinois-Chicago. Shirani is alleged to have sent an anonymous e-mail to a university administrator threatening a repeat of the shooting incident that had taken place the previous day at Northern Illinois University. The threat stated that a group of five individuals would carry out the attack sometime during the spring 2008 semester.

The FBI praised the campus police department and the administrative staff for dealing with the threat professionally and expeditiously. Kudos to both the campus police and the FBI for preventing a potential terrorist act as well as alarm on campus.

Phi Beta Cons on National Review Online

Editors note: I have five years of archived posts in one file that I will have to hand post individually into this WordPress platform and it is, indeed, a daunting task. There are all kinds of extra squiggles and code that needs to be ferreted out and deleted, links updated and images found. So expect to get hit with some golden oldies as I plunge ahead with this task. If I am to make any inroads, time to write new posts will be a bit truncated.

But, sadly, what I wrote about back in 2004, when the below was posted, is even more relevant today.

In 2004 I remember thinking, we still have time, that the culturally imperialist Sharia mongers couldn’t possibly infiltrate so pervasively and thoroughly in America as they have in Europe.

I was wrong. This post describes one instance, of thousands, of an ongoing national effort to promote “understanding” under the guise of “ecumenical out reach” between muslims and Christians. Christian churches - apparently as gutted by “progressive” infiltration as the rest of America - are blindly providing trojan horse groups like CAIR center stage.

And most of you have probably read about the “redneck” baiting ABC is doing on behalf of CAIR. That still angers me so much that I can’t yet write about it.

But I touch on the evidence of “creeping sharia” in this post. And all of this to set up a post describing how blatantly Great Britain’s muslims are defying western law and defiling western culture. Hell, it ain’t creeping sharia anymore, it’s freaking marching across the continent. But, that’s the next post.

From February 25,2004…. “This is How They Do It”
Continue Reading »

This should warm the cockles of every jihadist’s heart. Great Britain will soon be theirs.

BRITONS are leaving the country in record numbers—thanks to spiralling levels of IMMIGRATION, CRIME and TAX.
Government figures set to be released later this year will show that an astonishing 250,000 people fled Britain in 2007.
That’s 684 A DAY—or ONE every TWO MINUTES.
And it’s a massive 21 PER CENT increase on the 207,000 who went in 2006—and up nearly 70 PER CENT from the 149,000 who left in 1997.
[...]

Typical of those leaving are plasterer Damian Barrett and wife Alison.

The couiple, both 37, who are emigrating from Bolton-le-Sands, Lancs, with kids Holly, eight, and Joseph, six, to Auckland, New Zealand.

Alison said: “We’re tired of Britain, with its unfair tax system, crime, and live-to-work ethic. There are also too many foreigners coming in and using up all our resources. We want a better life.”

Source

from… The Islamist Challenge to the U.S. Constitution

“In August 2004, a local planning commission in Little Rock, Arkansas, granted The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[3] While the imam, Aquil Hamidullah, says his goal is to create “a clean community, free of alcohol, drugs, and free of gangs,”[4] the implications for U.S. jurisprudence of this and other internal enclaves are greater: while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.”
[...]
The Islamic Center for Human Excellence may seek to segregate schools and offices by gender. The enclave might also exercise broad control upon commerce within its boundaries-provided the economic restrictions did not discriminate against out-of-state interests or create an undue burden upon interstate commerce. But most critically, the enclave could promulgate every internal law-from enforcing strict religious dress codes to banning alcohol possession and music; it could even enforce limits upon religious and political tolerance. Although such concepts are antithetical to a free society, U.S. democracy allows the internal enclave to function beyond the established boundaries of our constitutional framework. At the very least, the permissible parameters of an Islamist enclave are ill defined.”

Hordes of self-righteous illegal mexicans parade like so many pompous little Napoleons while chanting insulting demands, supported by the liberals and the media and a president who apparently has neither the will nor wisdom that conservatives foolishly ascribed to the man. While the Mexican make their claim upon our land, Muslims are appropriating our country. They know the lay of the land, the threats to make, the alliances to grease. They are a cancer mutating through our government, our prisons, our universities and our communities, culling leagues of political sycophants, networking like the most adept American sales pro, bartering lies for concessions, embraced by a body of politicians whom I can only describe as decayed in will, spirit and mind; a passel of febrile and castrated men whose convictions are dry rotted - shredding at the merest wisp of a breeze - unable to support an ideal nor a promise.

I’m weary with the reading of it and the writing of it. Conservatives have to move against all the existing limitations and encroachments on free speech being imposed under so called hate speech laws. Any and all other convolutions of the law that the priesthood of liberal judges can conjure up to suppress opposition have to be firmly routed and defeated. If we can’t gain that ground back, we lose it all.
We have to be free to lawfully monitor every frigging land deal, every local election, every elected or nominated member on school boards, every bit of curriculum our kids see. We have to somehow raise enough awareness of the kind of deals and concessions that are being made and put these subterranean Muslim political machinations above the radar so that all of us know that a mosque is proposed or state-church law is to be violated , or 8 weeks of Islamic studies have been placed in the curriculum.

We have got to take the battle back to them and by them I mean the left and Islam. Be it Soros or Socialists or John Dean or Sheik Mo-frigging-hammad - they will destroy America. The riots that we see in France by a lazy pathetic and cowardly populace will soon be our plight. Maybe by then the American flag will be completely banned. Should it come to the point where we allow that to happen then we don’t deserve to fly her any longer. There is no courage or vision left in government and all of the men worthy of leading this country are being killed in Iraq.

For what?

So the rest of us can just continue to get our teeth kicked out by libs and muslims and their trained media flunkies? They fight and we sleep.
But to tell you the truth, I don’t sleep all that well these days anymore.

We need watchmen on the walls folks.

Where Are the Watchmen?

This Is How They Do It

I’ve been trying to catch up, going through my news feeds. When I get to writing over in my “day” blog (it pays the bills), well, those words I use over there describe a far different world - a world of recreation and play and zestful, vigorous American living. And it gets hard to come back in here to Sass. I’ve tried a few times in the last few days to finish this particular post but every time I go back into my news feeds to look for different material I feel like I’m drowning.

The cowardice of the media, the endless liberal posturing and histrionics, Bush’s stuttering performance and the steady drumbeat of Islamic dhimmitude - it all starts seeming rather ominous, foreboding, as if there is no turning back the approaching maelstrom.

And there isn’t a hell of a lot that I can think of to do about it. But then I keep coming back to this idea that I have had for a long time. I can start watching my local government. Local school boards. Planning commissions. Zoning commissions. Town council. Civic government is an arena where the enemy makes himself at home.

Here are the recent articles that put this notion back in my head.
First this from LGF:

“An Islamic society that sued for defamation after local news outlets linked it and its stalled mosque project to anti-Semitic extremists offered Friday to stop litigation in exchange for private mediation…. the suit named several individuals and community groups who questioned the society’s ties, a move decried as an attempt to bully people who were asking legitimate questions about the mosque. The suit has also chilled dialogue between the society and leaders of the local Jewish community.”(Link)

This Boston Mosque story demonstrates, in my mind, the areas where we as simple citizens have been so compromised, so pathetically undefended,that I hardly know how we can undo the damage that has been done. Undefended, because we didn’t think to keep an eye on who is running for the school board or the planning commission or the local zoning commission or who the various committees and town councils that govern our towns are composed of.

Hell, I’m thinking that when I read about this town council or the other voting to impeach Bush or making some statement about the war or refusing to participate in national security, well, I foolishly snicker. Who the hell cares about town councils?

Muslims do.
Socialists do.

Activist of every stripe and color do.

Steven Emerson makes the point, via Instapundit

“… Steven Emerson of the Investigative project, who was introduced by David Liebovitz and Paul Singer, co-hosts, penciled in problems of radical Islam’s encroachment here in America. He drew our attention to the failed Sami al Arian trial in Tampa, upcoming ones dealing with Hamas organizations in Chicago and New York. He cited the intimidation by Muslim civil rights groups like the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) -both emblematic of the extremist Muslim Brotherhood abuse of US predilections in our “Kumbaya” society to protect the “human rights” of “victims” and manipulate our basic Constitutional freedoms for their own nefarious ends. Emerson also referred to in passing his own involvement as a defendant in the current libel action brought by the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated Islamic Society of Boston against he and several others, including friends in the David project, as well at electronic and print journalists.”

Now, consider this from The Jewish Russian Telegraph:

“Though the I S B didn’t receive initial approval from the city to build its massive mosque until late 1998, various local Muslim groups had been trying to build a mosque on the parcel in question—sandwiched between Roxbury Community College, the Roxbury Crossing T stop and the Reggie Lewis athletic complex—for well over a decade.”

1998. Before 9.11. Before anyone gave a damn about mosques particularly. Back in 1988 I was showing real estate in West Chester, a booming area north of Cincinnati and was disconcerted when looking for an address in a typical suburban development to find a mosque dropped incongruously into the neighborhood. Go ahead and click that link, zoom in - it is the compound that you can see just to the left of the red address icon. Now push the map around and note the immediate neighborhood. Also note that they are far from the urban core, in fact, it has since become one of the wealthiest zip codes in South West Ohio. At the time, islam had not an iota of significance to me but I was damn irritated at whatever zoning fluke allowed for the existence of an edifice that was so obviously detrimental to adjacent property values.

But it was no more a “fluke” in West Chester than it was a fluke in Boston. It is simply the American way. You wish to build an edifice and you have a piece of land that you wish to acquire, a zoning variance made, you do what it takes to reach your goal. And if you are an Islamist, you practice Taqiya. You coerce and curry political favor and play the race card when thwarted.

And you continue the steady media drumbeat of dhimmitude via the willing and compliant local “reporters” who in self-righteous lock step produce cloying pieces on understanding and tolerance (spit).

Town councils, the ‘county seat’, municipalities, advisory boards, school boards, city planning commissions; all of those ,small drab courtroom chambers,public reviews, and poorly ventilated conference rooms are the locales wherein the dismantling of America began long ago. And Islamists who believe in umma and not America have become adept at using our system to take us down.

Now this from the LGF link:

“A top Boston Redevelopment Authority official who previously downplayed his role in the Roxbury mosque project of the Islamic Society of Boston assisted in the city’s reduction of the price the mosque backers paid for the site from $2 million to $175,000, according to BRA documents that have surfaced in lawsuits over the controversial project. The official, Mohammad Ali-Salaam, the BRA’s deputy director for planning, also raised funds for the project when he traveled to Abu Dhabi and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates as a representative of the city in 2000.”

If American citizens started monitoring their local governments on a regular basis perhaps those Islamists who are so eager to use our system won’t find their way uncontested. Perhaps back room deals made with PC addled small town politicians won’t be so easy to conceal.

In Iraq the Islamofascist blends in with the civilians to inflict the most severe damage. And the Islamofascist in America blends in with the men and women who walk the corridors of power and commerce. They do not plant bombs but they acquire rights and land and concessions that accomplish the same goal as their murdering kin. The destruction of America.

Our men are taking bullets for us in the middle east and we in turn are making their deaths meaningless by our insane paralysis.

So, where will you be when town council meets this week? Who is sitting on your school board?

Anyone interested in brainstorming the feasibility of setting up a site where bloggers can regularly report local activities in their towns and develop a pool of information that might give us a clearer picture perhaps of how thoroughly compromised we have become, please email me at roadsassy*at*gmail*dot*com.

Related: John Kerry’s Letter to Islamic Society of Boston

Better yet, get in touch with the folks at Grizzly Groundswell, or the 910 Group. They are a couiple of groups who are trying to implement citizen watch/response groups.

Muslim offers ideas on avoiding sexual abuse.

This is how they do it. For all of those who are happy to see the last vestiges of Christianity disappearing, I hope you will be as vociferous against the attempts of Muslims to assert their “moral” authority and attempt to incorporate their religious mandates into our “secular” society.

Here we have a little pristine Muslim bitch trying to insinuate that women are responsible for their own rapes. She has a slight point. If most women look like “it” is for sale, they ought not be too aggravated when men attempt to see if the merchandise is worth it. That personal sentiment aside, it is still incumbent upon the man not to touch what isn’t his. Personal responsibility.

But this lightweight wants to assert that it falls upon the woman to inhibit her behavior and says nothing of a man’s responsibility to keep it in his pants. Were this speaker a no-name Christian as opposed to a no-name Muslim this event would never have merited the attention of the press.

In fact, what is nauseating is the Muslim appropriation of a moral issue as if their pronouncements were unique. Similar sentiments, expressed by Christians, are routinely mocked as censorious, judgmental and hopelessly backwards.

In the West, we raise our children to make them . . . the object of attraction. We raise our girls to make them be picked up, to be asked for a date,” she said. “We tell the children you have to look pretty and sexy, and they are trained to follow the fashion and to make yourself alluring. It is there we are failing. I don’t think we see what we’re doing.”

[She]… favors billowy skirts and loose-fitting pants…She … believes her style helps her command and maintain the respect of men….eschewing the more “alluring” Western style of dress and establishing more boundaries between men and women is one possible answer.”[for sexual abuse]

Yes, this is how they do it. There are any number of religions who share mutual values and mutual repugnance at current societal mores. Most of them have been dismissed, discounted or caricatured by the media. But the media will continue to interview Muslims on issues where they have already denigrated the parallel Christian voice. You’ll note the dilemma of sexual abuse exists, in part, because we are subject to mores found “in the West, and “alluring” Western styles…” Not greedy Madison Ave advertisers. Not the snarling, multi- cultural PC pimps at MTV. It is not attributable to leagues of leftist professors across all nationalities dismantling family and Christian-Judeo moral code with much the same zeal that Muslims seem to demonstrate when defending their bad breed while propagating a duplicitous public posture of benign wisdom. It is in these types of innocuous sessions that Sharia is being pedaled across America.

“The mother of 8-year-old twins is partial to less-fitting clothing in observance of purdah, the concealing style of clothing common among Muslim women….She also believes her style helps her command and maintain the respect of men.”

“I hear constantly in the news the negative perspective of observing purdah,” she said. “I found it to be extraordinarily positive. We feel it is the one way women can walk freely. We see it as a means of emancipation.” Her daughter is forbidden from wearing shorts, but so is her son, she said. Both are taught to be modest. “Your shape is not revealed,” she said. “This way you’re establishing that you’re not inviting the wrong approach.” A teacher of the Alexander Technique, a method for releasing muscular tension, Malik met her husband, a native of Pakistan, during a student’s graduation. Their courtship was cerebral, intellectual, Malik said. “None of this flirtatious business,” she said.

To gullible, foolish souls who fancy themselves agnostics or those who suffer from the ubiquitous spiritual void that secularism can not satisfy - those folks will migrate towards Islam like geese to warmer climes.

Some people can not navigate without a group and the rule of the group.The media and the academics have removed all other gods off the table, but Allah they leave alone.

They have rationalized away all constraints, boundaries, taboos, and guidance. But they leave Sharia alone.

Perhaps it’s the left’s deep empathy for the nihilism inherent in Islam. Those who always succumb to gods and celestial longings, be it Jim Jone’s kool-aid flock or Oral Robert’s unflappable contributors, they are the ones who need what they think Islam is selling.

And apparently humans will buy into slavery. Willingly.