The Cancer of Islam Masticates Throughout the Globe

Islam Must Be Criticized All the Time

Listen to this extremely sobering video very carefully, then go to Scarlett Crusader where the links supporting the assertions and facts are listed. Or go to any of the sites that I have listed under the category “Islam Kills…” in the sidebar to your right.





As the bombastic Barack Hussein Obama prattles on about Christians, Jews and muslims uniting, suggesting that there be no walls between us on his happy little planet, islam, a disease that rots and devours the very flesh of freedom, progresses with the insatiable fervor of a full blown cancer in every country that has allowed a muslim majority to grow.

And that is what the very dangerous Obama would continue to facilitate. Hell, he will accelerate it. After all, he has stated that the islamic call to prayer is the sweetest sound he has ever known. It doesn’t take much research to conclude that Obama is far more an enemy to Christians and Jews than he is an enemy of islam. Just as he is an enemy to all that America has stood for. He is a trojan horse, of that I have no doubt.

No Obama, I want walls, very high walls between me and my enemies. And I want advanced weaponry mounted on them. I want a wall between the slavery of of islam and socialism and the freedom and prosperity of America. Barack Obama’s European tour has only demonstrated how utterly imperative it is that he is soundly defeated. Erased. Shoved down the memory hole. Forever.

The Insanity of Appeasing Muslims

It seems too lunatic to be true. But here a hair salon boss reveals how she was driven to the brink of ruin – and forced to pay £4,000 for ‘hurt feelings’ – after refusing to hire a Muslim stylist who wouldn’t show her hair at work.

[...]

For a year, Sarah has been facing financial ruin, due to a compensation claim for £34,000 brought by Bushra, 19, who has maintained she is due that figure after being turned down for a job at the Wedge salon in London’s King’s Cross.

In the event, the tribunal ruled this week that while Bushra’s claim of direct discrimination failed, her claim for indirect discrimination had succeeded.

Sarah has therefore been ordered to pay £4,000 compensation by way of ‘injury to feelings’.

Although this is a smaller sum than she’d feared she might have to hand over, Sarah, 32, is still outraged.

‘I am a small business and the bottom line is that this is not a woman who worked for me,’ says Sarah.

The muslim in question was also rejected by 25 other salons and even though she admits that Sarah said nothing that could be construed as an insult, she opted to sue. My guess is that Sarah looked like the softest target.

This is what comes of the ludicrous notion that offended feelings deserve compensation. Moreover it speaks to the insidious control the state exerts over the private business owner who has less and less freedom to conduct business profitably or in accordance with their beliefs. Such interference with private enterprise becomes even more insidious when coupled with the additional threat posed by  the very dangerous momentum with which sharia compliant banking is being implemented across the world. As it progresses, so does the imposition of sharia law.

Yet, we allow muslims continue to use our laws against us. And it isn’t just in England. Islam has global ambitions, and as one writer cautions, while warning of the acceleration of muslim sponsored censorship, it has become an issue that crosses all national boundaries.

“We can no longer be secure in the knowledge that our own laws or constitution will protect us. THE WHOLE WORLD IS UNDER THREAT and we’ve got to be watching for changes globally rather than nationally if we want to be prepared for what is going to absolutely affect each one of us.” (source)

From refusing to wear uniforms, to protesting male western doctors  treating muslim women, to muslim taxi cab drivers demanding special privileges , not to mention the pathetic dhimmis who acquiesce to muslim extortion, like the execrable Oregon principle who had the audacity to ban the Pledge of Allegiance in an American public elementary school, for fear of offending Muslims.

This list can go on and on -  creeping sharia and cultural jihad continues, abetted by the left, in nation after nation.

What the hell is it going to take for Americans to freaking wake up? And it won’t be Barack Hussein Obama who finally gets a clue, the would-be president who finds the shrill islamic “call to prayer” melodic and permits advocacy of “honor” killings on his official campaign site...

In 1997, Sarah got a job at a salon on London’s Portobello Road, where she remained for almost a decade. In March 2006, feeling ready to spread her wings, she wrote a business plan, secured a loan and invested £5,000 of her savings into the lease on a small salon on Caledonian Road.

[...]

‘I’d never felt as proud as I did on the day I picked up the keys to my salon,’ says Sarah.I was prepared to put my heart and soul into my business in order to make ends meet, and for the first few months, I worked 12 hours a day, six days a week, all by myself. ‘I barely saw daylight, but I didn’t mind because I was fulfilling my ambition.

[...]

By March 2007, the business was doing so well that Sarah needed to take on another stylist. (source)

And then a muslim walked in.  A muslim applying to an “edgy” salon, garbed in head scarf down to her brows. And she was looking for an excuse to sue, of that I have no doubt. Sarah interviewed her, discovered that she would refuse  to remove her head scarf and that was the end of it in her mind. If style is the product that you sell, and hair is the showcase, it is rather obvious that a dour muslim with nary a wisp of hair showing isn’t a good match. Rather like applying to be a nude model and refusing to take off your clothes. A sensible person simply wouldn’t apply.

One morning in the second week of June 2007, an innocuous white envelope landed on Sarah’s doormat. It contained a letter saying that she was being sued for £15,000 for indirect and direct discrimination by Bushra Noah. This, the letter stated, related to compensation for injury to her feelings and lost earnings. Later, that figure was increased to £34,000.

And so it goes. In every country where muslims are seeking a stronghold,  charges of discrimination and threats of lawsuits are becoming common. It is the same victim’s templates used by all so-called minorities. And  small business owners simply trying to hold their own, to make a living, are confronted with a well oiled grievance machine with absolutely no support from their individual governments. In fact, too many governments are bending their knees to these extortionists.

If you, as an American, have no intention of bowing down before foreign gods, then you damn well better start fighting.

Islam, George Soros, Barack Obama: The Worms Turn

The staccato messages of surrender fill the airwaves, intoned by sonorous pundits, oily politicians, fat and sated academicians, and a variety of global vermin.

…the billionaire “philanthropist” George Soros, insisting that the War on Terror has “done more harm than good….Francis Fukuyama saw the root problem in the Muslims’ “alienation from modernity.”…Madeleine Albright….declared that it is “important to listen to what others are telling you”…Senator Joe Biden argued for debt relief and funding of education programs in Muslim countries….GOP ex-Senator Warren Rudman argued that “America and our allies must address global poverty…

On and on they drone, each empty word faithfully reported by lapdog journalists, each word an act of obeisance to Islam, words piled upon words, marching in cadence to dhimmitude. And if they are silent for but one moment, you can hear the jackals of jihad howling. Jackals have little use for words.

Islam does not think in sound bites. They think in decades. They think in centuries. This is one template of their progress.

1. The Muslim diaspora in the Western world, while formally denouncing “terrorism,” will accept and condone religious justification for acts that effectively challenge the monopoly on violence of the non-Muslim host-state.

2. The Muslim diaspora will use a highly developed infrastructure of organized religion in the host-state-a network of mosques, Islamic centers and Muslim organizations-and deploy it either as a tool of direct political pressure in support of terrorist goals (e.g., British Muslims vis-a-vis Rushdie), or else as a means of deception and manipulation in order to diminish the ability of the host-society to defend itself (e.g., CAIR vis-a-vis post-9-11 America).

3. The non-Muslim establishment-public figures, politicians, journalists, academic analysts-will seek to appease the Muslim diaspora, or else it will shy away from confronting the problem of the immigrants’ attitudes and impact by pretending that it does not exist.

And the pundits and politicians keep turning the earth over. Like worms, they prepare the ground for the seeds of the West’s destruction. One such worm is George Soros. George has a template too. It is very compatible with Islam’s.

You tell me. How do you like the fact that Soros funded a project to instruct your local police in the sensitivities of Muslims?

… Northeastern University’s project known as the Promising Practices Guide: Developing Partnerships Between Law Enforcement and American Muslim, Arab, and Sikh Communities .
[...]
The Guide ‘s three authors (one of them a Muslim) have an eccentric view of what are “most dangerous threats in this war.” They are to be found not in the ideology of jihad but “in the successful propagation of anger and fear directed at unfamiliar cultures and people” among us Americans. The problem is not with the Muslims who perpetrate terrorist crimes but in the bias against Muslims that is supposedly rampant in today’s America…
[...]

By funding the ” Guide ” Soros has confirmed yet again that he is a visionary who sees immigration as an essential tool of revolutionary change. His metaphysical concept of Muslims’ victimhood based on their exclusion from the society demands the change of the society, not of the Muslim mindset. That is the meaning of his claim that the War on Terror “creates innocent victims and that helps the terrorists.” By encouraging the emergence of a subculture of hostile aliens within America, he promotes the growth of an alternative social and political structure of which the potential for further growth of Islamic terrorism is but one consequence.

JIHAD’S FELLOW TRAVELERS

[ed:my bold]

Yes, “terrorism is but one consequence.” Those familiar with this blog would agree that terrorism is actually one of the more benign components of Islam. Physical death is swift. Sharia is a prolonged and painful death.

George Soros is but one of many worms turning. I would say to you, so is Barack Hussein Obama, a man Soros has found worthy of investing in. A man who would be president of our country. A man who has said the following about Islam.

Where Are the Watchmen?

I have been waylaid by some rogue flu bug and thus, have been absent from duty, and I do apologize. As fate would have it, Ligneus has been having connection problems and still is off line. Sitting upright for any length of time is proving to be an uncomfortable experience, so this is when we start digging through those archives.

I give you “Where Are the Watchmen?” from April of ’06. The question still remains in ’08.

“In August 2004, a local planning commission in Little Rock, Arkansas, granted The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[3] While the imam, Aquil Hamidullah, says his goal is to create “a clean community, free of alcohol, drugs, and free of gangs,”[4] the implications for U.S. jurisprudence of this and other internal enclaves are greater: while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.”
[...]
The Islamic Center for Human Excellence may seek to segregate schools and offices by gender. The enclave might also exercise broad control upon commerce within its boundaries-provided the economic restrictions did not discriminate against out-of-state interests or create an undue burden upon interstate commerce. But most critically, the enclave could promulgate every internal law-from enforcing strict religious dress codes to banning alcohol possession and music; it could even enforce limits upon religious and political tolerance. Although such concepts are antithetical to a free society, U.S. democracy allows the internal enclave to function beyond the established boundaries of our constitutional framework. At the very least, the permissible parameters of an Islamist enclave are ill defined.”

Hordes of self-righteous illegal mexicans parade like so many pompous little Napoleons while chanting insulting demands, supported by the liberals and the media and a president who apparently has neither the will nor wisdom that conservatives foolishly ascribed to the man. While the Mexican make their claim upon our land, Muslims are appropriating our country. They know the lay of the land, the threats to make, the alliances to grease. They are a cancer mutating through our government, our prisons, our universities and our communities, culling leagues of political sycophants, networking like the most adept American sales pro, bartering lies for concessions, embraced by a body of politicians whom I can only describe as decayed in will, spirit and mind; a passel of febrile and castrated men whose convictions are dry rotted – shredding at the merest wisp of a breeze – unable to support an ideal nor a promise.

I’m weary with the reading of it and the writing of it. Conservatives have to move against all the existing limitations and encroachments on free speech being imposed under so called hate speech laws. Any and all other convolutions of the law that the priesthood of liberal judges can conjure up to suppress opposition have to be firmly routed and defeated. If we can’t gain that ground back, we lose it all.
We have to be free to lawfully monitor every frigging land deal, every local election, every elected or nominated member on school boards, every bit of curriculum our kids see. We have to somehow raise enough awareness of the kind of deals and concessions that are being made and put these subterranean Muslim political machinations above the radar so that all of us know that a mosque is proposed or state-church law is to be violated , or 8 weeks of Islamic studies have been placed in the curriculum.

We have got to take the battle back to them and by them I mean the left and Islam. Be it Soros or Socialists or John Dean or Sheik Mo-frigging-hammad – they will destroy America. The riots that we see in France by a lazy pathetic and cowardly populace will soon be our plight. Maybe by then the American flag will be completely banned. Should it come to the point where we allow that to happen then we don’t deserve to fly her any longer. There is no courage or vision left in government and all of the men worthy of leading this country are being killed in Iraq.

For what?

So the rest of us can just continue to get our teeth kicked out by libs and muslims and their trained media flunkies? They fight and we sleep.
But to tell you the truth, I don’t sleep all that well these days anymore.

We need watchmen on the walls folks.

Where Are the Watchmen?

Erasing Christianity, Erasing the West

Below are some excerpts of George Weigle’s “Europe’s Two Culture Wars”. If you want a clear picture of the West’s descent into a morass of multicultural, totalitarian hell, this very long but comprehensive piece covers all the bases.

Print it out or send it to anyone you know who, for whatever inane reason, are considering Obama or Hillary. If a clear understanding about what is ongoing in Europe doesn’t give appeasers and apologists pause, nothing likely will.

…five days short of the second anniversary of the Madrid bombings, the Zapatero government, which had already legalized marriage between and adoption by same-sex partners and sought to restrict religious education in Spanish schools, announced that the words “father” and “mother” would no longer appear on Spanish birth certificates. Rather, according to the government’s official bulletin, “the expression ‘father’ will be replaced by ‘Progenitor A,’ and ‘mother’ will be replaced by ‘Progenitor B.’”

As the chief of the National Civil Registry explained to the Madrid daily ABC, the change would simply bring Spain’s birth certificates into line with Spain’s legislation on marriage and adoption. More acutely, the Irish commentator David Quinn saw in the new regulations “the withdrawal of the state’s recognition of the role of mothers and fathers and the extinction of biology and nature.”

At first blush, the Madrid bombings and the Newspeak of “Progenitor A” and “Progenitor B” might seem connected only by the vagaries of electoral politics: the bombings, aggravating public opinion against a conservative government, led to the installation of a leftist prime minister, who then proceeded to do many of the things that aggressively secularizing governments in Spain have tried to do in the past. In fact, however, the nexus is more complex than that. For the events of the past two years in Spain are a microcosm of the two interrelated culture wars that beset Western Europe today.

The first of these wars—let us, following the example of Spain’s birth certificates, call it “Culture War A”—is a sharper form of the red state/blue state divide in America: a war between the postmodern forces of moral relativism and the defenders of traditional moral conviction. The second—“Culture War B”—is the struggle to define the nature of civil society, the meaning of tolerance and pluralism, and the limits of multiculturalism in an aging Europe whose below-replacement-level fertility rates have opened the door to rapidly growing and assertive Muslim populations.

The aggressors in Culture War A are radical secularists, motivated by what the legal scholar Joseph Weiler has dubbed “Christophobia.”1 They aim to eliminate the vestiges of Europe’s Judeo-Christian culture from a post-Christian European Union by demanding same-sex marriage in the name of equality, by restricting free speech in the name of civility, and by abrogating core aspects of religious freedom in the name of tolerance. The aggressors in Culture War B are radical and jihadist Muslims who detest the West, who are determined to impose Islamic taboos on Western societies by violent protest and other forms of coercion if necessary, and who see such operations as the first stage toward the Islamification of Europe—or, in the case of what they often refer to as al-Andalus, the restoration of the right order of things, temporarily reversed in 1492 by Ferdinand and Isabella.

The question Europe must face, but which much of Europe seems reluctant to face, is whether the aggressors in Culture War A have not made it exceptionally difficult for the forces of true tolerance and authentic civil society to prevail in Culture War B.

continue reading… George Weigle’s “Europe’s Two Culture Wars”

Sphere: Related Content

Read More

Posted by zee on Apr 20, 2008 in Muslims / Islam, Western Civilization | 6 comments

So When Are You Going to Grow a Set America?

Is this what you want America? Are you really so ready to capitulate? Islam is a “religion” that 15 years ago, the majority of Americans would associate with…..nothing. Who gave a shit about Muslims? Now, this anachronistic breed of depraved Nazis in robes are dictating the very words that can come out of your mouth.

I tell you what, all you Christian haters, you are a bunch of ball-less whores. You jubilantly piss on Christ and cower before Mohammad. The ACLU strut across the nation smashing tablets of the Ten Commandments but fall meekly silent as Islam is introduced in in public schools and mosques are rife with political activism.

I have no patience with niceties tonight. I don’t give a flying fuck who finds this language coarse . When a woman – an elected politician can be jailed for stating historical facts about the Pedophile Prophet Mohammad, and the Muslims who then threaten her with death are protected – that is really standing reality right upside down on it’s freaking head.

The Austrian authorities have indicted politician Susanne Winter on charges of incitement and degradation of religious symbols and religious agitation. This offence carries a maximum sentence of two years. Last January, Ms Winter said that the prophet Muhammad was “a child molester” because he had married a six-year-old girl. She also said he was “a warlord” who had written the Koran during “epileptic fits.”

The politician, a member of the Austrian Freedom Party FPÖ, an anti-immigration party which is in opposition, added that Islam is “a totalitarian system of domination that should be cast back to its birthplace on the other side of the Mediterranean.” She also warned for “a Muslim immigration tsunami,” saying that “in 20 or 30 years, half the population of Austria will be Muslim” if the present immigration policies continue.

Following her remarks, Muslim extremists threatened to kill Susanne Winter and she was placed under police protection. Today, the Justice Department in Vienna announced that Ms Winter will be charged with “incitement and degradation of religious symbols” … If convicted she may have to serve up to two years in jail for her opinions.

However, Alfred Hrdlicka, the Austrian “artist” who depicted Jesus and his apostles engaging in homosexual acts of sodomy during the Last Supper, has not been indicted. Nor will he be. Depicting Jesus sodomizing his apostles is not considered to be a “degradation of religious symbols” in Austria, but referring to the historic fact that Muhammad married a six-year old girl is “incitement to racial hatred.”

from

Hyscience – ‘Extreme Dhimmitude’ – Defined

Speech is being threatened and suppressed in nation after nation; England, France, Netherlands, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Germany, Austria, the Balkans, India and increasingly in the US, where they actually haven’t had to display their banshee nature very much since our turncoat politicians and progressive traitors are collectively opening the doors of government and defense wide open while selling our assets to their grotesque Arab pimps.

Do you understand what this is breaking down to? Your government will prosecute you if your speech “offends” muslims, the police will not protect you from those muslims who threaten to kill you and, truth be told, they can pretty much go ahead and make good on their threats without too much concern about the ramifications.

Even if your murderers are apprehended, the dhimmi media will cover for them, failing to identify their “religion” or ethnicity. “Human rights ” activists will surround them while screaming that racism drove them to it, wealthy socialists will supply them with an expensive defense, and your tax dollar will feed and house them in a prison where they will turn around and proselytize the population.

And all of you pathetic tattooed, pierced freaks with an Ipod growing out of your head, with your sullen, blustering hatred of America and Christianity – you who think you are such iconoclasts, such a brave vanguard of some type of “new man”.

As you twitter away about going green and masturbate your over bloated sense of self-righteousness, while nestling in the wealth of a country that you loathe, you will find that you will soon eat your every nightmare, to.the.bone. And it will not be conservatives or Christians serving you your last meal but those enemies that you now embrace.

Jihad is coming for you boys and girls, mark my bloody words, it’s coming.

Related Reading:

Muslim Apologist Makes Ass of Himself

A muslim apologist lists all of the “grievances” muslims have against the west. Like allowing Jews to live, or the proliferation of music and art, and, oh yes, they hate democracy, preferring sharia laws, and did I mention that if we just killed all the Jews, life would be giddy.

Seriously, this man sounds as if he were reading from a Saturday Night Live skit, but, the ass pretty much echoes what you generally hear from muslims and all of their tamed dhimmis.

Educational aid for “progressives”: Dhimmi means you. Read all about yourselves here.

The Veiling of Sculptures and Statues Campaign

Veiling of public statues
at the International Women’s DayAnonymous Group of Democratic and Free Thinking
Press Release March 7, 2008

Throughout the night on 6th of March we have successfully continued our statue veiling campaign. With this reappearing action, we want to inspire the public to discussion concerning Islamisation and associated taboo subjects. By veiling statues in Berlin, Braunschweig, Dortmund, Düsseldorf, Helsinki, Moscow, Tampere, and Turku, we have expanded our activities to Germany, Finland and Russia within six months.

• 8 statues have been veiled with a Burqa or headscarf

• Refering to basic European values, the statues have been fitted with an armband reading “gender equality!”

• Every statue has been fitted with a signboard comparing an Article from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 1948, and on the other hand quotation from Quran regarding its treatment towards women.

The aim of the campaign is to refer to the creeping Islamisation endangering the European idea of UNITY IN DIVERSITY and other similar cultural achievements of the liberal thinking world. Particularly, the phenomenom that Muslim women wear increasingly Burqa or headscarfs, is a visible expression of the challenge and threat to our liberal societies with their values such as women´s rights, democracy, liberal and secular thinking.

With this campaign, we would like to increase public awareness of our liberal values and to advocate them. The liberal achievements such as equal rights of men and women, individual freedom, Human Rights, and the dignity of each individual are no negotiable values! We would like to point out that substantial and partly irreconcilable differences exist between the Muslim and the liberal thinking world.

continue reading…

The Veiling of Sculptures and Statues Campaign

Creeping Sharia: This Is How They Do It

Editors note: I have five years of archived posts in one file that I will have to hand post individually into this WordPress platform and it is, indeed, a daunting task. There are all kinds of extra squiggles and code that needs to be ferreted out and deleted, links updated and images found. So expect to get hit with some golden oldies as I plunge ahead with this task. If I am to make any inroads, time to write new posts will be a bit truncated.

But, sadly, what I wrote about back in 2004, when the below was posted, is even more relevant today.

In 2004 I remember thinking, we still have time, that the culturally imperialist Sharia mongers couldn’t possibly infiltrate so pervasively and thoroughly in America as they have in Europe.

I was wrong. This post describes one instance, of thousands, of an ongoing national effort to promote “understanding” under the guise of “ecumenical out reach” between muslims and Christians. Christian churches – apparently as gutted by “progressive” infiltration as the rest of America – are blindly providing trojan horse groups like CAIR center stage.

And most of you have probably read about the “redneck” baiting ABC is doing on behalf of CAIR. That still angers me so much that I can’t yet write about it.

But I touch on the evidence of “creeping sharia” in this post. And all of this to set up a post describing how blatantly Great Britain’s muslims are defying western law and defiling western culture. Hell, it ain’t creeping sharia anymore, it’s freaking marching across the continent. But, that’s the next post.

From February 25,2004…. “This is How They Do It”

Where Are the Watchmen?

from… The Islamist Challenge to the U.S. Constitution

“In August 2004, a local planning commission in Little Rock, Arkansas, granted The Islamic Center for Human Excellence authorization to build an internal Islamic enclave to include a mosque, a school, and twenty-two homes.[3] While the imam, Aquil Hamidullah, says his goal is to create “a clean community, free of alcohol, drugs, and free of gangs,”[4] the implications for U.S. jurisprudence of this and other internal enclaves are greater: while the Little Rock enclave might prevent the sale of alcohol, can it punish possession and in what manner? Can it force all women, be they residents or visitors, to don Islamic hijab (headscarf)? Such enclaves raise the fundamental questions of when, how, and to what extent religious practice may supersede the U.S. Constitution.”
[...]
The Islamic Center for Human Excellence may seek to segregate schools and offices by gender. The enclave might also exercise broad control upon commerce within its boundaries-provided the economic restrictions did not discriminate against out-of-state interests or create an undue burden upon interstate commerce. But most critically, the enclave could promulgate every internal law-from enforcing strict religious dress codes to banning alcohol possession and music; it could even enforce limits upon religious and political tolerance. Although such concepts are antithetical to a free society, U.S. democracy allows the internal enclave to function beyond the established boundaries of our constitutional framework. At the very least, the permissible parameters of an Islamist enclave are ill defined.”

Hordes of self-righteous illegal mexicans parade like so many pompous little Napoleons while chanting insulting demands, supported by the liberals and the media and a president who apparently has neither the will nor wisdom that conservatives foolishly ascribed to the man. While the Mexican make their claim upon our land, Muslims are appropriating our country. They know the lay of the land, the threats to make, the alliances to grease. They are a cancer mutating through our government, our prisons, our universities and our communities, culling leagues of political sycophants, networking like the most adept American sales pro, bartering lies for concessions, embraced by a body of politicians whom I can only describe as decayed in will, spirit and mind; a passel of febrile and castrated men whose convictions are dry rotted – shredding at the merest wisp of a breeze – unable to support an ideal nor a promise.

I’m weary with the reading of it and the writing of it. Conservatives have to move against all the existing limitations and encroachments on free speech being imposed under so called hate speech laws. Any and all other convolutions of the law that the priesthood of liberal judges can conjure up to suppress opposition have to be firmly routed and defeated. If we can’t gain that ground back, we lose it all.
We have to be free to lawfully monitor every frigging land deal, every local election, every elected or nominated member on school boards, every bit of curriculum our kids see. We have to somehow raise enough awareness of the kind of deals and concessions that are being made and put these subterranean Muslim political machinations above the radar so that all of us know that a mosque is proposed or state-church law is to be violated , or 8 weeks of Islamic studies have been placed in the curriculum.

We have got to take the battle back to them and by them I mean the left and Islam. Be it Soros or Socialists or John Dean or Sheik Mo-frigging-hammad – they will destroy America. The riots that we see in France by a lazy pathetic and cowardly populace will soon be our plight. Maybe by then the American flag will be completely banned. Should it come to the point where we allow that to happen then we don’t deserve to fly her any longer. There is no courage or vision left in government and all of the men worthy of leading this country are being killed in Iraq.

For what?

So the rest of us can just continue to get our teeth kicked out by libs and muslims and their trained media flunkies? They fight and we sleep.
But to tell you the truth, I don’t sleep all that well these days anymore.

We need watchmen on the walls folks.

Where Are the Watchmen?

This Is How They Do It

This Is How They Do It

I’ve been trying to catch up, going through my news feeds. When I get to writing over in my “day” blog (it pays the bills), well, those words I use over there describe a far different world – a world of recreation and play and zestful, vigorous American living. And it gets hard to come back in here to Sass. I’ve tried a few times in the last few days to finish this particular post but every time I go back into my news feeds to look for different material I feel like I’m drowning.

The cowardice of the media, the endless liberal posturing and histrionics, Bush’s stuttering performance and the steady drumbeat of Islamic dhimmitude – it all starts seeming rather ominous, foreboding, as if there is no turning back the approaching maelstrom.

And there isn’t a hell of a lot that I can think of to do about it. But then I keep coming back to this idea that I have had for a long time. I can start watching my local government. Local school boards. Planning commissions. Zoning commissions. Town council. Civic government is an arena where the enemy makes himself at home.

Here are the recent articles that put this notion back in my head.
First this from LGF:

“An Islamic society that sued for defamation after local news outlets linked it and its stalled mosque project to anti-Semitic extremists offered Friday to stop litigation in exchange for private mediation…. the suit named several individuals and community groups who questioned the society’s ties, a move decried as an attempt to bully people who were asking legitimate questions about the mosque. The suit has also chilled dialogue between the society and leaders of the local Jewish community.”(Link)

This Boston Mosque story demonstrates, in my mind, the areas where we as simple citizens have been so compromised, so pathetically undefended,that I hardly know how we can undo the damage that has been done. Undefended, because we didn’t think to keep an eye on who is running for the school board or the planning commission or the local zoning commission or who the various committees and town councils that govern our towns are composed of.

Hell, I’m thinking that when I read about this town council or the other voting to impeach Bush or making some statement about the war or refusing to participate in national security, well, I foolishly snicker. Who the hell cares about town councils?

Muslims do.
Socialists do.

Activist of every stripe and color do.

Steven Emerson makes the point, via Instapundit

“… Steven Emerson of the Investigative project, who was introduced by David Liebovitz and Paul Singer, co-hosts, penciled in problems of radical Islam’s encroachment here in America. He drew our attention to the failed Sami al Arian trial in Tampa, upcoming ones dealing with Hamas organizations in Chicago and New York. He cited the intimidation by Muslim civil rights groups like the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) -both emblematic of the extremist Muslim Brotherhood abuse of US predilections in our “Kumbaya” society to protect the “human rights” of “victims” and manipulate our basic Constitutional freedoms for their own nefarious ends. Emerson also referred to in passing his own involvement as a defendant in the current libel action brought by the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated Islamic Society of Boston against he and several others, including friends in the David project, as well at electronic and print journalists.”

Now, consider this from The Jewish Russian Telegraph:

“Though the I S B didn’t receive initial approval from the city to build its massive mosque until late 1998, various local Muslim groups had been trying to build a mosque on the parcel in question—sandwiched between Roxbury Community College, the Roxbury Crossing T stop and the Reggie Lewis athletic complex—for well over a decade.”

1998. Before 9.11. Before anyone gave a damn about mosques particularly. Back in 1988 I was showing real estate in West Chester, a booming area north of Cincinnati and was disconcerted when looking for an address in a typical suburban development to find a mosque dropped incongruously into the neighborhood. Go ahead and click that link, zoom in – it is the compound that you can see just to the left of the red address icon. Now push the map around and note the immediate neighborhood. Also note that they are far from the urban core, in fact, it has since become one of the wealthiest zip codes in South West Ohio. At the time, islam had not an iota of significance to me but I was damn irritated at whatever zoning fluke allowed for the existence of an edifice that was so obviously detrimental to adjacent property values.

But it was no more a “fluke” in West Chester than it was a fluke in Boston. It is simply the American way. You wish to build an edifice and you have a piece of land that you wish to acquire, a zoning variance made, you do what it takes to reach your goal. And if you are an Islamist, you practice Taqiya. You coerce and curry political favor and play the race card when thwarted.

And you continue the steady media drumbeat of dhimmitude via the willing and compliant local “reporters” who in self-righteous lock step produce cloying pieces on understanding and tolerance (spit).

Town councils, the ‘county seat’, municipalities, advisory boards, school boards, city planning commissions; all of those ,small drab courtroom chambers,public reviews, and poorly ventilated conference rooms are the locales wherein the dismantling of America began long ago. And Islamists who believe in umma and not America have become adept at using our system to take us down.

Now this from the LGF link:

“A top Boston Redevelopment Authority official who previously downplayed his role in the Roxbury mosque project of the Islamic Society of Boston assisted in the city’s reduction of the price the mosque backers paid for the site from $2 million to $175,000, according to BRA documents that have surfaced in lawsuits over the controversial project. The official, Mohammad Ali-Salaam, the BRA’s deputy director for planning, also raised funds for the project when he traveled to Abu Dhabi and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates as a representative of the city in 2000.”

If American citizens started monitoring their local governments on a regular basis perhaps those Islamists who are so eager to use our system won’t find their way uncontested. Perhaps back room deals made with PC addled small town politicians won’t be so easy to conceal.

In Iraq the Islamofascist blends in with the civilians to inflict the most severe damage. And the Islamofascist in America blends in with the men and women who walk the corridors of power and commerce. They do not plant bombs but they acquire rights and land and concessions that accomplish the same goal as their murdering kin. The destruction of America.

Our men are taking bullets for us in the middle east and we in turn are making their deaths meaningless by our insane paralysis.

So, where will you be when town council meets this week? Who is sitting on your school board?

Anyone interested in brainstorming the feasibility of setting up a site where bloggers can regularly report local activities in their towns and develop a pool of information that might give us a clearer picture perhaps of how thoroughly compromised we have become, please email me at roadsassy*at*gmail*dot*com.

Related: John Kerry’s Letter to Islamic Society of Boston

Better yet, get in touch with the folks at Grizzly Groundswell, or the 910 Group. They are a couiple of groups who are trying to implement citizen watch/response groups.

This Is How They Do It

Muslim offers ideas on avoiding sexual abuse.

This is how they do it. For all of those who are happy to see the last vestiges of Christianity disappearing, I hope you will be as vociferous against the attempts of Muslims to assert their “moral” authority and attempt to incorporate their religious mandates into our “secular” society.

Here we have a little pristine Muslim bitch trying to insinuate that women are responsible for their own rapes. She has a slight point. If most women look like “it” is for sale, they ought not be too aggravated when men attempt to see if the merchandise is worth it. That personal sentiment aside, it is still incumbent upon the man not to touch what isn’t his. Personal responsibility.

But this lightweight wants to assert that it falls upon the woman to inhibit her behavior and says nothing of a man’s responsibility to keep it in his pants. Were this speaker a no-name Christian as opposed to a no-name Muslim this event would never have merited the attention of the press.

In fact, what is nauseating is the Muslim appropriation of a moral issue as if their pronouncements were unique. Similar sentiments, expressed by Christians, are routinely mocked as censorious, judgmental and hopelessly backwards.

In the West, we raise our children to make them . . . the object of attraction. We raise our girls to make them be picked up, to be asked for a date,” she said. “We tell the children you have to look pretty and sexy, and they are trained to follow the fashion and to make yourself alluring. It is there we are failing. I don’t think we see what we’re doing.”

[She]… favors billowy skirts and loose-fitting pants…She … believes her style helps her command and maintain the respect of men….eschewing the more “alluring” Western style of dress and establishing more boundaries between men and women is one possible answer.”[for sexual abuse]

Yes, this is how they do it. There are any number of religions who share mutual values and mutual repugnance at current societal mores. Most of them have been dismissed, discounted or caricatured by the media. But the media will continue to interview Muslims on issues where they have already denigrated the parallel Christian voice. You’ll note the dilemma of sexual abuse exists, in part, because we are subject to mores found “in the West, and “alluring” Western styles…” Not greedy Madison Ave advertisers. Not the snarling, multi- cultural PC pimps at MTV. It is not attributable to leagues of leftist professors across all nationalities dismantling family and Christian-Judeo moral code with much the same zeal that Muslims seem to demonstrate when defending their bad breed while propagating a duplicitous public posture of benign wisdom. It is in these types of innocuous sessions that Sharia is being pedaled across America.

“The mother of 8-year-old twins is partial to less-fitting clothing in observance of purdah, the concealing style of clothing common among Muslim women….She also believes her style helps her command and maintain the respect of men.”

“I hear constantly in the news the negative perspective of observing purdah,” she said. “I found it to be extraordinarily positive. We feel it is the one way women can walk freely. We see it as a means of emancipation.” Her daughter is forbidden from wearing shorts, but so is her son, she said. Both are taught to be modest. “Your shape is not revealed,” she said. “This way you’re establishing that you’re not inviting the wrong approach.” A teacher of the Alexander Technique, a method for releasing muscular tension, Malik met her husband, a native of Pakistan, during a student’s graduation. Their courtship was cerebral, intellectual, Malik said. “None of this flirtatious business,” she said.

To gullible, foolish souls who fancy themselves agnostics or those who suffer from the ubiquitous spiritual void that secularism can not satisfy – those folks will migrate towards Islam like geese to warmer climes.

Some people can not navigate without a group and the rule of the group.The media and the academics have removed all other gods off the table, but Allah they leave alone.

They have rationalized away all constraints, boundaries, taboos, and guidance. But they leave Sharia alone.

Perhaps it’s the left’s deep empathy for the nihilism inherent in Islam. Those who always succumb to gods and celestial longings, be it Jim Jone’s kool-aid flock or Oral Robert’s unflappable contributors, they are the ones who need what they think Islam is selling.

And apparently humans will buy into slavery. Willingly.