Gee Obama, Kissing Muslim Ass Working For You Yet?

H/T:@crystalyn

Here is Your Precious Islam Obama, You Stupid Ass

This video represents typical muslim fare. This is who they are.And the disgraceful coward now defiling the former White House wants to play nicey nice with these folks.  May you pay for your treachery Obama. May you pay.

A Symbiotic and Dangerous Tryst: Islam and the Left

I have been playing around with different templates and when switching back to this one, I lost the ability to display the comments left on the “About Sassy” page. Thus, G. Singer’s comment was buried, my apologies,  but I do want to respond to it.
G.Singer

Sass: you make the mistake of equating ‘lefty’, ‘liberal’, ‘progressive’, or whatever, with being cozy with Islam. I freely admit that most of my family and friends are progressive, Dem-voting left-leaners. And every one of us supports Israel to the fullest, despises the Islamofascist crap taking over parts of the world, and supports justified wars like the one in Afghanistan. I feel the same anger you feel about Obama whenever another of our great servicemen or women dies in Iraq. I come from a military family (Uncle is 2-star General, dad was in 101st airborne) and I am very educated about what war means. I try not to lump all Republicans into one net of “evil fascist constitution shredders.’ It’s hard, I try. Maybe you should try to see ‘leftists’ as individuals, too.

‘lefty’, ‘liberal’, ‘progressive’

For the sake of this conversation  I’ll use the term leftist.

The left cozy with Islam? If they ain’t cozy, then they sure as hell don’t rub each other the wrong way in the ideological bed that they share. CAIR and other muslim apologists are riding on the coattail of every so-call “social justice” organization that they can hustle, using the same lawsuit intimidation tactics as Jessie Jackson or the ACLU. And their objectives are quite similar; the eradication of Christian influence, the destruction of Israel, censorship under the guise of “hate speech” laws, the end of profiling, a diminished role for America in the world, destruction of capitalism, accommodation to the third world and the middle east – to name just a few items where the left and islamists are in concordance.

The left and islam share the same ideological root system. Call it nihilism, call it post-modern, progressivism, call it anything you wish -  it is a root that produces a virulently anti-human, anti-freedom fruit. You have a selection of totalitarian doctrines that all contend that humans must be collected and herded like cattle, seen as economical units, expendable when too costly to maintain. It all denigrates man into beings less than animals, bereft of individual will and value. Indeed the left elevates animals and reviles man. Muslims and leftists both espouse ideologies that would reduce man to utter misery.

The writer of this post says it quite well. I would add that it is far from an isolated opinion, but the consensus of those who have spent the last several years studying this.

The onset of the 21st Century saw a revival of Leftist radicalism. While the old 1968 hippy generation saw it’s ideals drowned in a cesspool of drugs and experiments in social licentiousness, Post modernism has shed itself of all values: life is futile, man’s efforts are absurd in their presumptuousness and arrogance.

This radical Left movement is just as ready for a scorched earth as radical Islamism is. Whereas the former have nothing left to lose after their ideals collapsed over their ears, the latter are urged to self-sacrifice for a global victory of the collective Ummah. It is a marriage quite literally made in hell: both are negators of the life-force, but for different reasons.

A culture’s implicit sense of life is all-pervasive. Theirs has translated into the negative territory of nihilism and death-worship. For Muslims man is a mere plaything in the hands of a fickle God. To Postmodernists man is a drifter in a purposeless, unknowable universe whose fate is determined by chaos and glandular secretions.

And this is how we got here.
Let’s Get it Right

I try not to lump all Republicans into one net of “evil fascist constitution shredders”.

Certainly you jest. With Obama on record as having taken shots at the constitution throughout his public career, including in his latest overblown speech – surely you do not think the constitution is now safe? And the constitution has been being “shredded” over the course of many decades by all political persuasions – persuasions that all share the same root of antipathy towards the west.

Maybe you should try to see ‘leftists’ as individuals, too.

I do. They are individuals whom I oppose.  I see no grounds for compromise and I care not a whit if a leftist rants  against islam at the top of his lungs if he refuses to see the similarities between it and socialism or Marxism. Of what good are their protests, ala Christopher Hitchens, if they turn around and advocate for a form of government as intrusive and dehumanizing?

Perhaps the left does not recognize their spiritual cousins because they still are carrying around the debunked and discredited Edward Said Orientalism model. Perhaps because they continue to reduce a blood thirsty, beheading jihadist down to the level of an annoying criminal. Maybe, because the left is incapable of naming evil, they are unable to discern the evil in their own and islam’s doctrines. Whatever the reason for the blind spot, the fact remains that, short of divine intervention, the left and islam will lead this world to hell. How they destroy each other along the way will make an interesting, if tragic, sideshow.

And perhaps the collusion between the Hamas jihadists and the world’s leftest communities escaped your attention.  Looks pretty damn cozy to me.

No one shouted “Go Back to the Oven” at the pro-Hamas rallies held in Atlanta in the last few days, but the sentiment was echoed in the messages their organizers promoted. Islamic fundamentalists spouted their hatred at the gatherings far-Left activists called to protest Israel’s self-defense. The unholy alliance met at the CNN Center January 3rd and at the Israeli consulate the previous Tuesday, where CAIR members and Communists blocked traffic, endorsed the annihilation of Israel, dressed in terrorist garb, extolled those plotting a new Holocaust, and equated Jewish self-defense with Nazi genocide.

The tone should be no surprise considering who organized these events. The organizational force behind both was the Atlanta chapter of the International Action Center (IAC). An e-mail from the IAC indicated that Emory Advocates for Justice in Palestine, Athens for Justice in Palestine, and other “peace and justice organizations” would be involved. On site, I discovered these “peace and justice organizations” included the once-laudable Amnesty International – alongside, the International Socialist Organization and the Revolutionary Communist Party. (The RCP publication Revolution were also represented.)
Continue reading….Hate on the Home Front

I’ll end with this piece. It speaks for itself.

Urban radicalism in Europe as portrayed by the recent riots in Athens is a constant worry of the European security services, since there is ample evidence of wider connections between radicals and terrorists.

There are two major themes to be looked upon. Firstly the relationship between the extreme-leftist terrorist groups that operate in the so-called “Mediterranean axis” – France, Italy, Greece and Spain – and secondly, the connection of these groups to Islamic extremists.

The radical – anarchist movement in Europe is pretty strong and well organized with thousands of loyal supporters. Back in 2005, the riots in Paris proved that the radicals and second-generation Muslim immigrants in France were able to form the political agenda of that time, although they were not successful in preventing Sarkozy’s ascendance to power 18 months later.
[...]

In Italy, the local press revealed in 2006 that the remains of the Red Brigades were forming a strategy of collaboration with Islamists in order to create a common front against Western capitalism. The information came after the Italian intelligence services tapped the phones of the Italian terrorist group shortly before the group was about to launch new attacks.

In the same country, popular youth radical magazines such as “Voce” propagate with great enthusiasm the works of Hizballah and Hamas. It is also public knowledge that radical NGOs across continental Europe support illegal immigration into Europe and express a great interest in attacking any traditional aspects of contemporary Western civilization and culture.

Lorenzo Vidino, an Italian writer and security analyst describes a “flirt between the radical Left and the Islamists in Europe that tends to become an open cooperation in the streets of every main European metropolis….” Continue reading….Urban Radicalism in Europe & Terrorism

Palestine is a Myth and Hamas Nothing But Bloody Islamic Terrorists

I am so bloody tired of the appeasers. So tired of those who embrace evil, calling it compassion, who extend understanding towards terrorists and revile their own traditions and culture. That would, unfortunately, describe half of America – the half that voted Obama. I’d bet good money that the majority of those whining about the poor “palestinians” come from that faction of ignorant saps.

Palestine is a myth. Pure and simple. Hamas is a proxy for Iran and Iran is an islamic bully who has unequivocally declared that their avowed goal is the destruction of the West, particularly Israel and America.

Islamic cleric Salah Sultan appeared on Egypt’s Al-Nas TV last week and delivered a warning of death and destruction for America. Not only did he attack the U.S. for its military support of Israel in its fight against the Hamas terrorist organization, but he vowed retaliation such that more Americans would be killed than those Palestinians (and, presumably, Hamas terrorists) killed in the present conflict in Gaza, emphasizing that this would take place “soon”:

America, which gave [Israel] everything it needed in these battles, will suffer economic stagnation, ruin, destruction, and crime, which will surpass what is happening in Gaza. One of these days, the U.S. will suffer more deaths than all those killed in this third Gaza holocaust. This will happen soon.

He also invoked a notorious Islamic hadith on the inevitable annihilation of the Jews by Muslims:

The stone, which is thrown at the Jews, hates these Jews, these Zionists, because Allah foretold, via His Prophet Muhammad, that Judgment Day will not come before the Jew and the Muslim fight. The Jew will hide behind stones and trees, and the stone and the tree will speak, saying: “Oh Muslim, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.” The only exception will be the Gharqad tree. (Source)

Rummaging through my archives I ran across an old draft from 2002 that included the two excerpts reproduced below. I remember once being appalled by such pronouncements – now I understand that nothing sane ever comes out of the mouth of a muslim.

…In the words of their leading theorist, Ismail Al-Faruqi, “Nothing could be greater than this youthful, vigorous and rich continent [of North America] turning away from its past evil and marching forward under the banner of Allahu Akbar [God is great].” Or, in the words of a teacher at the Al-Ghazly Islamic School in Jersey City, N.J.,

“Our short-term goal is to introduce Islam. In the long term, we must save American society. Allah will ask why I did not speak about Islam, because this piece of land is Allah’s property.”

a Daniel pipes piece 1999

This muslim slave of “allah” savors imagining what a Seder massacre must have felt like for the bomber, practically salivating at the prospect of spilling Jewish blood.

“You entered silently, with the faith and confidence with which Allah inspired you. Despite all the obstacles, fortifications, and security measures, you reached [the appointed place], sat down at one of the tables, talked, told a few jokes, and laughed with them, and then Allah decreed for you a martyr’s death. What heroism, courage, and strength – almost unmatched on the face of the earth!”

– Dr. Khalil Ibrahim Al-Sa’adat, a columnist, writing the Saudi government-controlled daily Al Jazirah. The quotation applauded the actions of the Palestinian suicide bomber who detonated himself at a Passover Seder in a Netanya hotel. April 1, 2002

ADL website

That is the voice of Islam. Arrogant barbarity. It hasn’t changed in a thousand years, and it certainly hasn’t changed since 2002. Islamic jihad is what is operative in Palestine right now. Not deranged Jews licking their chops over Palestinian dead, but the legitimate nation of Israel defending itself against the mental and spiritual pygmies of the middle east. Pygmies, such as those depicted in this video, chanting that Jews should be returned to the ovens, yet, no doubt, these are the  same cretins who bellow about hate speech when confronted with the truth about their deplorable “religion”.

In 2002 I was still confident that America had at least a decade before Islam could approach the level of toxicity here that it has achieved in Great Britain. Back then I thought that, surely, Americans would wake up. After all, videos like the one below are a dime a dozen. It’s pop culture for jihadists, to savor the death of the West, to hunger for the annihilation of our freedom and prosperity. But seven years later, Americans remain woefully ignorant. Or completely indifferent.

(Source)

And as to be expected, Western media, CNN particularly, are invested not in truth, but in supporting the pigs of palestine, as LGF records here, here, here,here and here. The LA Slimes puts one of these execrable cretins on the payroll. Think the term “pigs of “palestine” is too strong? Too bad, I am done with niceties, attempts at civility. Civility should not be extended to barbarians nor the fools who support them. Given muslim behavior – staging their precious “innocent children” as props in their savagery, stealing incoming humanitarian aid and re-selling it – they deserve nothing but the missiles Israel serve them.

Just Spread Your Cheeks Obama, They’ll Get the Message

Obama to Give Speech in Islamic Capital?

“Barack Obama is toying with the idea of making a speech from an Islamic capital within his first 100 days in office. The scuttlebutt is all about finding the right one. (The consensus is Cairo–which is a terrible idea. An Obama speech there would be read as a shameful acceptance of Mubarak’s oppressive rule.) But my question is: what would he say?

The global problems generating from within the Muslim world today are so odious and so obviously self-inflicted that any honest speech on the matter would offend and enrage Muslims the world over. At the same time, because of these very problems, a softball speech about Islam’s current role in global affairs would look like cowardly capitulation. If Obama splits the difference and mixes lukewarm praise with lukewarm condemnation, the stunt will be seen rightly as meaningless.

Obama gives great speeches, and this has encouraged an unwarranted faith in the utility of the medium. No matter how dazzling, oratory is the least effective weapon in the counterterrorism arsenal. If anything, a foreign policy speech aimed at resolving the conflict between the West and radical Islam would give enemies hope that the U.S. is shifting to a less proactive stance, and returning to the more symbolic approach of the pre-Bush days.” Continue reading….

Really. The “symbolic approach of the pre-Bush days“? When Clinton couldn’t be bothered with bin Laden, symbolized by cigars and blow jobs? The most harm that will befall jihadists during the Obama years will be the occasional malfunctioning suicide bomber. Unless they are subjected to too many of his speeches. That could prove terminal.

Muslims in Prison: An Army in Waiting?

Australian Muzzie Ran Drug Ring from Jail Cell

A convicted murderer allegedly made about 460 calls a day on a smuggled mobile phone as he coordinated a $250,000-a-week drug trafficking syndicate from his maximum security jail cell.

Bassam Hamzy, 29, who is serving a 21-year sentence for murdering a man outside a Sydney nightclub, allegedly made more than 19,000 calls from inside Lithgow prison, west of Sydney, between May 1 and June 11 this year.

Most of the calls were made in Arabic, to a syndicate of 12 close friends and family members who allegedly shifted $1.5 million worth of cocaine and ice from NSW to Victoria in six weeks.

Islam in Jail

Imprisonment is not much of a punishment for muslims. These are not people who particularly value freedom. I am quite certain that every sizable prison is permeated with Islamists, so new prisoners will easily find solace and support from their fellow believers.  And as the article quoted above attests, it is feasible to continue illegal operations, be it the distribution of drugs or terrorist plotting. It is a damn shame prisoners are granted rights sufficient to allow this type of maneuverability. But that is the world we now live in. Evil is rewarded more often than not.

I have often thought that the huge Muslim population in America’s prisons might as well be a standing army, waiting for their killing orders. A couple of coordinated prison breaks in a specified region, timed to coincide with a terrorist attack, may not be as far fetched as it sounds.

For years, the Washington-based Center for Security Policy has been tracking the infiltration of U.S. prisons by agents of Saudi Wahhabism…The Center’s research (now confirmed by subsequent Senate investigations) has concluded that Muslim chaplains trained in and certified by Saudi-supported Wahhabi institutes in America have been accepted into our prison system by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). This has led to fears that a dangerous Islamic “fifth column” is developing in our prisons with the unwitting cooperation of the federal government.
[...]
In 2005, Robert Mueller, Director of the F.B.I. told the Senate Intelligence Committee that “prisons continue to be fertile ground for extremists who exploit both a prisoner’s conversion to Islam while still in prison, as well as their socioeconomic status and placement in the community upon their release.” According to published reports, radical Islamists have put a high priority on reaching disaffected inmates and recruiting them for their own deadly purposes. The Washington Times quotes an al Qaeda training manual that identifies as “candidates” for recruitment those who are “disenchanted with their country’s policies,” especially convicted criminals. The article quotes a U.S. corrections official who acknowledges that Americans behind bars are “literally a captive audience, and many inmates are anxious to hear how they can attack the institutions of America.”
[...]
The conversion program is funded with Saudi money through the National Islamic Prison Foundation, an organization that underwrites “prison outreach” but whose real goal is the conversion of large numbers of inmates (primarily African-American) (1) not only to Wahhabism, but to its radical Islamist agenda….and the effort is both successful and, for the most part, hidden from public view.
[...]
The Saudis have directed considerable financial resources specifically toward the American Black Muslim community. In one effort to showcase the “bounties” of Wahhabism to this target audience, the Saudis’ late King Fahd pledged $8M for a lavish mosque in shabby South Central Los Angeles…This was a very deliberate recruitment process by the Saudis – trying to find black Muslims who had a real potential for Islamic learning and also for submission to their Wahabbist agenda. They are taught Islam with the intent to expand their influence. ..According to Reza Safa, an authority on the manner in which Saudi Wahhabism is spread throughout the world, “as many as 90% of American converts to Islam are black.”

(Source)

When you consider the possibilities, prison serves as fertile recruiting grounds for future members of Obama’s proposed domestic army. Under the guise of “social justice”, abetted by an existing network of Imans – a network already dedicated to arranging their converts’ “socioeconomic status and placement in the community upon their release” – Obama’s “National Civilian Corps” is a perfect fit. And God knows, it will make for fine editorial copy, just ooozing with redemption and “hope”. Young men saved from gangs and drugs, inspired by Islam, transitioned into their new life on the outside in service to Obama’s vision. Armed thugs, dedicated to the destruction of America sanctioned by the governement, in an organization that Obama has already declared he wants as well funded as America’s military. Yes, a nightmarish thought, but then, I expect nightmares to be the standard fare served up by the Obamanites.

Islam: “The Perfect War Machine”

You Only Need to Kill One

Bill Warner

A Democratic congressman was at a public meeting that included a military officer. The question was asked: What is the most important function of the military today? The officer replied that fighting Islamic militants was the most important mission. The congressman quickly replied that it was not a problem and besides, we could not fight 1.5 billion Muslims.

The congressman shares a worldview with George Bush. George Bush made a critical mistake after the attack on September 11th; a mistake that created the presidency of Barack Obama. Bush could not name the enemy-political Islam. Then in the Iraq war he was only effective at the military war. Churchill and Roosevelt were great war leaders because they were able to conduct a military war and a propaganda war at the same time. A political leader’s task in war is as an ideological leader. The generals cannot do this job.

As a result, Bush won the military war and lost the propaganda war. Those who hated the Iraq war were drawn to Obama. This is how Bush created Obama’s success.

Bush is incapable of being an ideological leader. On September 12th he should have declared political Islam to be the enemy of all kafir civilization. In doing so, he would have only repeated what was in the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. Instead, his blindness made him create a logical impossibility-a war without an enemy.

Islam is the perfect war machine. It has both a military strategy, found in the Sira and the Hadith, and a brilliant war ideology. This perfect war machine has worked flawlessly for 1400 years and is working brilliantly today. November 4 th was a greater victory for political Islam than September 11th.

But no university teaches anything about Islamic war doctrine. West Point does not teach a single course on Islamic war doctrine or history. West Point’s Middle East professors are as dhimmized as Harvard’s professors (which is where West Point gets their teachers). Remember that Bush went to exclusive schools and received a good education. As a result he knows nothing about political Islam, any more than any of his classmates do.

Is it impossible to kill 1.5 billion Muslims? It is a military possibility, but kafirs do not have the political will for such a task. Besides, it is not necessary to kill Muslims. You just need to kill Mohammed. In short, we need to launch an ideological war to respond to Islam’s jihad doctrine.

And what would an ideological war look like? How about open debate without the usual politically correct, multicultural narrow-mindedness? How about a leader, such as a congressman, being able to speak about Islam’s jihad doctrine. (Of course, few of our so-called political leaders would ever speak against a potential voter. A notable exception to this is Sue Myrick of North Carolina who has formed an Anti-Terrorism Caucus.

An ideological war would include our schools, particularly state schools, teaching about the Koran and the Sunna. History courses that would include the Tears of Jihad, the killing of 270 million kafirs. Women’s studies that would include Sharia law. Religion courses that would teach the death of Christianity in Turkey, the Middle East and Africa. Military history that would include the great battles of Islam. Courses on slavery that would go beyond the standard-issue West Africa/white man on wooden ships.

An ideological war would include a media that actually used critical reasoning and connected the dots in the Islamic violence that wracks the world with 12,221 attacks since September 11th in 39 countries.

So, we don’t need to kill 1.5 billion Muslims, but we do need to kill Mohammed if we are not to go the way of Christianity in Turkey, which is now 99.7% Muslim. We will either fight an ideological war or die as a kafir civilization.
Bill Warner
You Only Need to Kill One

Robert Spencer, Jihad, and “MainSt. Media”

Always on Watch has over an hour of conversation with Robert Spencer. If you have only heard Spencer via 5 minutes on Fox, I strongly recommend that you hear him uninterrupted by commercials, or Bill O’Reilly. Rich with facts and exegesis, painful to listen to, compounded as it is with the knowledge that America is now in the hands of those who agree more with Islamists than they do with Americans.

For those who may not know, Robert Spencer’s work can be found on his blog Jihad Watch.

Always on Watch (blogging at The Gathering Storm)  is always able to secure  excellent guests. It amazes me sometimes what “folks” can do. I just heard someone refer to it as “MainSt. Media”.  Sounds good. Since the anarchists, rebels and dirty old hippies have managed to go turn themselves into the “Establishment”, maybe they can remove their sorry asses from the streets. The streets belong to our side now.

The damnable thing is, the hippies and leftists of the sixties  ranted against an imaginary oppression. They now come swaggering through the doors of power bearing with them the very oppression which they had  proclaimed America was guilty of exercising. Obviously, given their ascent to power, their infiltration of education, their dominance in culture, that they were not then, nor since,  oppressed.

That have become that ogre of fascism that they have always feared.
Obama and his possee have already demonstrated their willingness to suppress speech. If you want to do anything, fight for the right of “MainSt.” broadcasters like “Always on Watch” to retain the right to broadcast. Support their efforts and the hundreds of other worthy media outlets that are aligning themselves for the fight ahead.

Speaking of censorship, another worthy recipient of our support is ‘No Compromise’ – just recently  “permitted” to resume  broadcasting again. You’ll find them talking about it here, and their site here.

Peaceful Muslims Advise Israeli Women to Leave or Be Raped

Aired on Al-Arabiya TV Dubai/Saudi Arabia -

October 31, 2008 – 00:02:10 : Egyptian Lawyer Nagla Al-Imam Suggests Arab Men Should Sexually Harass Israeli Women and Declares: Leave the Land So We Won’t Rape You.

“Leave The Land So We Won’t Rape You” : Female Egyptian Lawyer

The Third Jihad

It was difficult enough to speak the truth about Islam in a PC addled Bush administration. The advent of an Obama administration will likely lead us down the dark path Europe now slogs on. Just north, in Canada, the Islamists are tightening their grip around the throat of free speech and CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood and like groups in America will have a green light should the Marxist Obama ascend his throne.

Because there is really little difference between islam – a complete theocratic system that swallows freedom, personal choices, politics, family relationships whole – and the’isms of the left. Except they put a “god” on the throne. A god quite unlike the Christian god who will at least allow an individual to choose a path to hell if it so behooves him. It’s called free will, a concept that islamists deem to be a blasphemy.

This page offers more excerpts of the complete DVD that may be purchased. The darkness Obama brings over this country will usher in yet a deeper shade of hell and it’s name is Islam. Be prepared.

The Third Jihad

What is The Third Jihad?

The Third Jihad exposes the war the media is not telling you about.

It reveals the enemy our government is too afraid to name.

One person who is not afraid to tell you the truth is Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a Muslim American and former physician to the US Congress.

After the FBI releases a radical Islamist manifesto describing how to destroy America from within, Dr. Jasser decides to investigate.

The Third Jihad is about what he discovered.

Interviews are conducted with radical Islamists in the US and the leaders trying to stop them, such as Rudy Giuliani, Clinton CIA Director Jim Woolsey, NYC Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, Senator Joe Lieberman, former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, and former terrorist group member Tawfik Hamid. (source)

Free Speech, Islam, Barack Obama

At one point, YouTube pulled this video, much the same as they tend to pull down anti-Obama videos. We can expect more protection for islamofascists if Barack Obama ever takes office. Like his muslim buddies, Obama has, thus far, proven himself to be very unfriendly towards free speech when such speech is critical of him. Fortunately, there was sufficient outcry to restore Condell’s video. Unfortunately, a successful outcome in such battles depends on the free dissemination of knowledge. Obama will hinder that process considerably.

Apparently YouTube, who has had some challenges with Turkey and Pakistan, have decided that it is easier to block ‘problematic’ content themselves than standing up for freedom and have Pakistani Internet operators wreck havoc on them.

We are still waiting for the day when big media realizes they have a responsibility to stand up for freedom of expression.

In his latest video, Pat Condell sure manages to step on some toes in this latest video. But that is well deserved, for what happens is serious and what he has to say is important. : (Source)

Though I appreciate Condell’s excellent work against Islam, I find it sad and ironic that he, as an atheist, also disparages Christianity, the only religion boasting a God who respects individual free will. In the end, it will be Christians defending Condell’s rights to preach against Islam, even as he attacks their own faith.

McCartney and Mickey: The Latest To Be Condemned to Death by Muslims

Muslims threaten to kill McCartney in Israel

Mohammad the Murdering Prophet

A Muslim terrorist leader based in Lebanon has threatened to send suicide bombers to kill former Beatle and international music icon Paul McCartney when he performs in Israel later this month.

McCartney will perform in Tel Aviv as part of ongoing celebrations marking the 60th anniversary of Israel’s modern rebirth.

In remarks carried by British tabloid Sunday Express, Sheikh Omar Bakri said that makes McCartney the enemy of all Muslims.

Bakri, a Syrian national who once resided in London, warned McCartney that if he will be targeted if he comes to Israel.

“Paul McCartney is the enemy of every Muslim. We have what we call ‘sacrifice’ operatives who will not stand by while he joins in a celebration of [Israeli] oppression. If he values his life Mr. McCartney must not come to Israel. He will not be safe there. The sacrifice operatives will be waiting for him.”

McCartney was reportedly shocked by the threat, but defiantly refused to cancel his Tel Aviv appearance. McCartney said that several anti-Israel political groups had also asked him to not visit the Jewish state.

Mickey Mouse must die, says Saudi Arabian cleric – Telegraph

Sheikh Muhammad Munajid claimed the mouse is “one of Satan’s soldiers” and makes everything it touches impure.

But he warned that depictions of the creature in cartoons such as Tom and Jerry, and Disney’s Mickey Mouse, had taught children that it was in fact loveable.

The cleric, a former diplomat at the Saudi embassy in Washington DC, said that under Sharia, both household mice and their cartoon counterparts must be killed.

Mr Munajid was asked to give Islam’s teaching on mice during a religious affairs programme broadcast on al-Majd TV, an Arab television network.

Muslims Always Seem to Have Murder on Their Minds

I am at a loss as to when Christian leaders have ever called for the murder of those who broadcast “immoral content”, but don’t tell Progressives that. Their brains can’t deal with reality.

Mohammad the Murdering Prophet

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) — Saudi Arabia’s top judiciary official has issued a religious decree saying it is permissible to kill the owners of satellite TV networks that broadcast immoral content.

The 79-year-old Sheik Saleh al-Lihedan said Thursday that satellite channels cause the “deviance of thousands of people.” …

Al-Lihedan was answering listeners’ questions during the daily “Light in the Path” radio program in which he and others make rulings on what is permissible under Islamic law. One caller asked about Islam’s view of the owners of satellite TV channels that show “bad programs” during Ramadan.

“I want to advise the owners of these channels, who broadcast calls for such indecency and impudence … and I warn them of the consequences,” he said.

“What does the owner of these networks think, when he provides seduction, obscenity and vulgarity?” he said.

“Those calling for corrupt beliefs, certainly it’s permissible to kill them,” he said. “Those calling for sedition, those who are able to prevent it but don’t, it is permissible to kill them.” (source) (my bold)

Via LGF

Barack Hussein Obama, 9.11 and Islam

I am in the middle of learning a new job and it has been quite time consuming. I have been “telecommuting”, for the most part, since 2003 and I am fortunate to have again found online work after a rather rough period of unemployment (during which it never occurred to me to see what government program could help) and thus, I am spared the drudgery of commutes and wardrobes , and, thanks be to god, having to listen to Obama-brain colleagues prattle on about their savior.

Working from home for this ADD addled woman is always an exercise in self-discipline. I have to make a determined effort not to click out of my projects to see what is going on in this miserable election season. I don’t have the time to blog as thoroughly as I would wish, so I will be sending out truncated drive-by posts for now.

One question on my mind after yesterday’s “political truce” is what was the point of the pretense? Honoring the victims of 9-11 would have been accomplished far more effectively if it had been made clear that Barack Obama has far more in common with America’s enemies than he has with the victims whose lives were snuffed out by the islamists responsible for 9.11. The dinosaur mainstream media are sniffing around Alaska like feral dogs, looking for anything they can throw at Sarah Palin. But they keep themselves at a distance from Obama’s disturbing past. Be it his ties with Islam, his days at Columbia, his dirty ties with Chicago politics or his deep roots with the radical left, the mainstream media is passive. There was no honor in remaining silent about this trojan horse candidate on the annivarsary of 9.11, just is there is no honor amongst the journalists who blindly and arrogantly push the travesty that is Barack Obama on the American people.

Obama's muslim Roots

I am not in the least satisfied with Obama’s disclaimers regarding his muslim affinities and ties. Frankly, there is actually little difference between marxists, socialists and muslims. They all loathe individual freedom, capitalism and America. But I damn sick of people’s knee jerk reactions when Barack Obama’s relationship with Islam is honestly explored. I have little time to develop this more, but Andrew G. Bostom at the American Thinker, as usual, has done an exceptional job. I urge you to read it all.

Sober, independent analyses by academics, including published essays in The Christian Science Monitor, and The New York Times, concur that Obama’s childhood experience of Islam — as perceived by Muslims from Islamic societies, in particular — has two critically important, and inter-related ramifications: his status as a Muslim; and more ominously, as an apostate from Islam.
During his childhood years in Indonesia, Barack Obama was enrolled as a Muslim (see here, here, here, and here) at his primary schools (this is confirmed, conclusively, in a registration document — which the Associated Press photographed — made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia, demonstrating that his Muslim step-father listed Obama’s boyhood religion as Islam), and also attended the mosque during that period. Tine Hahiyary, a former teacher at one of these schools, claimed that the young Obama actively took part in “mengaji” classes (consistent with devout Islamic education), which instruct students to read the Koran in Arabic. And the Indonesian daily Banjarmasin Post interviewed Rony Amir, a Muslim classmate of the young Obama, who characterized Obama as “…previously quite religious in Islam.” While disputing Obama’s childhood Muslim religiosity, a subsequent Chicago Tribune report still concedes that the young Obama was at least an irregularly practicing Muslim, who occasionally prayed with his step-father in a mosque.
Irrespective of Obama’s Muslim devoutness as a child, one must also bear in mind how contemporary (and classical) Islamic Law views the offspring of any marriage between a Muslim man (Obama’s birth father and step-father were both Muslims), and a non-Muslim woman. Sheikh ‘Abdus-Sattar Fathallah As-Sa`eed, professor of Koranic Exegesis and Koranic Sciences at Al-Azhar University — for more a thousand years, the pre-eminent center of Sunni Islamic religious education — in a recently issued a fatwa (June 20, 2002), reiterated plainly the Islamic principle that paternity determines (Muslim) religious identity for a child born of a Muslim father, and a non-Muslim wife:
There is nothing wrong, as far as Islam is concerned, that a Muslim man marries a Christian woman, but he should stipulate (in the marriage contract) that any children from the marriage will be Muslims.
Not surprisingly then, as Daniel Pipes has assiduously documented, the predominant understanding about Obama in Islamic societies is that the Democratic Presidential nominee, at minimum, has “Muslim origins” (as stated explicitly for example in the Egyptian newspaper, Al-Masri al-Youm). Libyan dictator Mu‘ammar al-Qaddafi has referred to Obama as “…a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia.” Analyses by Al-Jazeera have called Obama a “non-Christian man,” made reference to his “Muslim Kenyan” father, and observed, tellingly, that “Obama may not want to be counted as a Muslim but Muslims are eager to count him as one of their own.”
Continue reading….Obama, 9/11, and Freedom of Conscience

More Creeping Sharia

I guess it would be the height of insanity to expect today’s presidential candidates to address the encroachment of Islam. I suppose it has to get as bad as it is in Europe before Americans wake up.

• Muslim cabbies in Minn. lose round in court

  Muslim cabbies whose religious beliefs go against driving passengers who carry alcohol have lost another round in Minnesota courts. The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday against the cabbies’ latest attempt to block penalties from being imposed when they refuse to transport passengers because they’re carrying alcoholic beverages. An ordinance adopted by the Metropolitan Airports Commission last year revokes a cabbie’s license for 30 days for refusing to pick up a passenger for any reason at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. A second refusal brings a two-year revocation.

  
  

• Prayer tiff at Swift plant – The Denver Post

  Nearly 400 Muslim workers who walked off the job Friday night at a Greeley slaughterhouse stayed home Monday to protest the denial of time to pray when their religious fasting ends during the workday. Officials of the union that represents the workers, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 7, met with managers at JBS Swift & Co. on Monday over accommodations for the workers, mostly Somalis, who say they have not been allowed to break for food, water and prayer when religious fasting in observance of Ramadan ends each day, UFCW spokesman Manny Gonzales said. The workers stayed home Monday while negotiations continued, employee Ahmed Mohamud said. “They’re working with us,” Mohamud said of Swift managers, noting that a resolution is expected today. Company officials would acknowledge in a prepared statement only that an undisclosed number of workers walked out Friday night and that Swift was trying to make accommodations for the workers’ religious practices. The employees walked off Friday night after they were told to keep working rather than break to end their daily fast, employees said. They said bathrooms were locked and water fountains shut off. “They’re upset with their prayer time, and we’re filing appropriate grievances to be sure their needs are being met,” Gonzales said of the workers.

  
  

• Inver Grove Heights charter school changing student prayer time

  An Inver Grove Heights charter school that came under investigation by the state Department of Education in the spring over allegations that it illegally promoted the Muslim faith will make changes this fall in the way it accommodates student prayer. Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy (TIZA) will reduce the length of voluntary Friday prayers and have staff members who wish to pray do so in a room separate from students, according to a letter school director Asad Zaman sent to the Minnesota Department of Education. The school, responding to the state investigation, has maintained that it has been in compliance with state and federal laws.

  
  

• A place for prayer at USF

  ampa, Florida-Slowly word is getting out to USF’s estimated large Muslim student population. They no longer have to look for a place to pray on campus because students now have a private place to worship. Members of USF’s Muslim Student Association are introduced to the school’s Serenity Room in the new Marshall Student Center. Twenty-one year old Narjis Zaidi says the small room on the north side of the Marshall Center’s third floor brings the peace and quiet she looks for. “During certain times of day the beams of the sun they reflect into the room in a very soothing and relaxing way. I’ve come here to pray and to relax or take a breather for a few minutes,” says Narjis. There’s also a wash room for Muslims to cleanse their feet, hands, arms and face before prayer. Until now they’d wash their feet in the school’s bathroom sinks they’d pray where possible on campus 5 times a day.

  
  

• Muslims for Barack Obama ’08

  
  

  • ISSUES & SOLUTIONS

    QUESTION: What are issues and recommendations for solutions that are unique to Muslim Americans?

    1. A Law against harrassment of a Muslim women wearing Hijab at the Airport, DMV and other public arenas.

    2. Institute a Law to allow Muslim Employees to take a hours off from work for Friday Jummah Prayer.

    3. Make the 2 Eid’s, recognized National Holidays on Calendars with days off from work.

    4. Optional Halal meals in federal buildiings, public schools and colleges.

    5. Provide prayer areas suitable for Salah and Jummah, in public and private facilities. (i.e. Malls, Airports, Universities and government buildings.)

    6. Organize a Muslim American group to assist in recommendations for US foreign policy affecting majority Muslim countries.

• THE MIDNIGHT SUN » Leftist double standards

  Daily Mail – Councillors have been ordered not to eat during town hall meetings while Muslim colleagues fast during the holy month of Ramadan. All elected members at Left-wing Tower Hamlets Council in East London have been sent an email asking them to follow strict Islamic fasting during September no matter what their faith. As well as restricting food and drink until after sunset, the authority’s leaders have decided to reduce the number of meetings throughout the month so they do not clash with the requirements of Ramadan. …. But some members of the Labour-run council say the demands favour one religious group over the others.

  
  

• Minneapolis enables sharia law « Creeping Sharia

  Not surprising from a state where Muslim cab drivers refuse to pick up passengers with alcohol or dogs, where local colleges install Islamic foot baths, the airport installs Islamic prayer rooms, where Islamic school administrators don’t know how to raise the American flag, and where a Muslim congressman refuses to condemn Muslim American Society for the violent and anti-Semitic statements found on the group’s website.

  
  

Muslims and Democracy: Oil and Water

Islam and Democracy

Bill Warner

It is election season in America and time to look at one the of the dhimmis‘ favorite myths-the democratization of Islam. Great blood and treasure have been spent in Iraq to bring democracy to Islam.

But it makes no difference how much blood and treasure are spent; Islam is no more compatible with democracy than pigs are with flight. Islam has an entire doctrine of politics and government that was laid out by Mohammed. And just like pigs were not made for flight, Islamic political doctrine was not made for democracy.

The reason for this is the perfect example of Mohammed. Mohammed achieved success only when he became a politician and warrior. We may have politicians who invoke religion as part of their political persona, but we do not have any politicians who actually speak for god. Mohammed spoke for god. All Muslims did what they were told. Mohammed did not operate any kind of primal democracy; Mohammed and Allah ruled absolutely down to the smallest detail.

It is at this stage of the argument that Muslims like to invoke the idea of Mohammed’s consulting with his Companions as a model for democracy. At the battle of Badr, one of the men asked Mohammed if his battle orders were from Allah? Mohammed said that it was his own opinion, not Allah’s. The man pointed out that if the troops were placed in front of the well, it would be to Islam’s advantage and Mohammed followed his advice.

The argument is that Mohammed listened to the voters. Hence, Islam is democratic. But when you read the entire Sira (the biography of Mohammed) and the Hadith, such “votes” by the Companions are extremely rare.

Here is an example of how non-democratic Islam is.

Abu Muslim Book 020, Number 4573:
[…] Shouldn’t we overthrow them [the worst of rulers] with the help of the sword? Mohammed said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you then find anything detestable in them you should hate their administration, but do not withdraw yourselves from their obedience.”

In short, as long as a leader is a Muslim, obey him, even if he is a tyrant. Does that sound like a democratic view? What if the tyrant is Sadam Hussein? Obey him.

But this is not the real reason that Islam cannot ever have democracy. The real reason is found in the word-kafir, a political word. The Muslim is superior to the kafir in politics and culture and the kafir must submit to the will of Islam in public affairs. Democracy is based upon the idea of the Golden Rule. The Golden Rule leads to equality in law and politics. But a Muslim and a kafir are not equal in political Islam. Votes are equal. We have a contradiction and democracy submits to Islam and tyranny.

There is a third reason why Islam is not capable of being democratic. Democracies are the source of the idea of human rights. Islam does not grant human rights to kafirs.

Christians are 3% of the population in Iraq and are 30% of those fleeing Iraq. Why? Persecution by political Islam. About 1300 years ago Iraq was Christian. Soon it will be 0% Christian. The tragedy is that this is of no importance in the media or houses of worship.

But we digress. The point is that Islam only gives full rights to Muslims. Kafirs, Christian and otherwise are second-class citizens, basically semi-slaves. This inequality is built into the doctrine of Islam and is fully supported by the example. If Mohammed wanted democracy he would have practiced democracy as a sacred example. But his sacred example was supreme, unquestioned ruler.

Islam is perfect, universal, complete and eternal. It does not have a reform option. Democracy is a kafir form of politics and is anti-Islamic.
Bill Warner (Source)

copyright (c) CBSX, LLC

Muslim Lies

Via Kabyles.net

Apostasy in islam : The point of no return

By Abdullah Al Araby

For fourteen centuries, Muslims were able to conceal some of their most outrageous teachings from the rest of the world. Their deceptions were hidden behind language, cultural and geographic barriers. Modern technology and new communication methods have made it difficult for Muslims to hide the dark side of Islam any longer. Muslim advocates, especially in the West, are now faced with the tough task of explaining the discrepancies between how they want Islam perceived as a tolerant, civil and peaceful religion ; and the realties of some of its basic tenets, which are quite the opposite. They’re finding it hard to maintain the façades and to simultaneously remain faithful to the harsh doctrines that are essential to the practices of authentic Islam.
[...]
Ali Gomaa issued a wide range of opinions on critical issues of Islam such as Jihad, women’s status and the right of Muslims to change religions. News agencies around the world published them in multiple languages. In regard to a Muslim’s right to renounce Islam and to join another religion that is called apostasy, his initial rulings sounded lenient. The Washington Post-Newsweek forum in English was one of the forums that published his decisions.

[...]

My hopes were soon shattered. A few days later, the Grand Mufti, issued another statement. This time he was speaking in Arabic in Cairo and what he said was completely different : “What I actually said was that Islam prohibits a Muslim from changing his religion and it’s a crime that must be punished.”

It was then that I realized that we had all been fooled, again. The Muslim strategy of only speaking half-truths was still alive and well. What is being said in places like Washington to English speaking groups is almost simultaneously retracted and rendered meaningless when they speak in Arabic in places like Cairo. What was originally presented as simply a rare and remote possible exception had become the general rule. Changing religions from Islam to another faith is interpreted as an act of apostasy. The Islamic mindset dictates that such apostasies can undermine the foundations of Muslim societies.

It’s difficult for non-Muslims to understand how a personal decision to change one’s religion by one Muslim or even hundreds could undermine an entire Islamic society. And, assuming that it could, would denial of the facts change anything ? Apparently the grand Mufti thought so. However, he must have imagined that he achieved both of his goals. On one hand, it was to polish Islam’s image in the West ; and on the other, he spoke the truth about Islamic polices in the Islamic world.

The only way that Islamists like the Mufti can continually get away with such deceptive maneuvers is for us to allow them to do so. There must be clarity about Islam’s consistent track record of doubletalk about thorny issues such as this one. Non-Muslims really need to know the truth about just what constitutes apostasy in the Muslim world. (Continue reading)

Also see the site, Apostates of Islam

Muslim Student Association and Their “Hadith of Hate”

Muslims and their apologists will tell you that they are victims of islamophobia. That the few who spew hatred are the rarity. Yet the proof to the contrary is pervasive wherever you find practitioners of the “faith”. The Muslim Student Association is not some obscure “extremist” group. They are on campuses throughout America. And the following “sacred hadith” published on their website is standard fare.

Islam: Religion of Hate

The hadith (sacred teaching) reads as follows:

“Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him….”

From The Terrorism Awareness Project

As Muslim Student Association (MSA) chapters have become increasingly influential at universities and colleges around the country, critics have charged that it is a hate group that sympathizes with the international jihad and promulgates an anti-American and anti-Semitic ideology in its campus actions.

In response, the MSA has claimed that it is merely another religious and cultural group similar to Hillel, a club for Jewish students, or the Newman Club for Catholics. That deception has been now unmasked at the University of Southern California, where the school’s Provost, Chrysostomos L. Max Nikias, reacting to a call from the David Horowitz Freedom Center and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, has ordered the campus MSA to remove a “despicable” hadith calling for Muslims to murder Jews as a condition for redemption from its website.

David Horowitz, President of the Freedom Center, hails this as a breakthrough moment when the double standards that control the political and intellectual culture of most universities have finally been challenged. “Up to now, the slightest criticism of radical Islam on campus has been slammed as ‘Islamophobia,’ while Muslim groups and their radical fellow travelers have been allowed to say the most hateful things imaginable about Christians and Jews without any reaction from university administrators whatsoever,” Horowitz says. “Provost Nikias has called the hadith on the MSA website for what it is: despicable. Given the atmosphere that prevails on most campuses today, it was an act of integrity on his part to make this call and to demand that the MSA live up to basic standards of civility that should govern the university.”
Continue reading…“Hadith of Hate” Banned at USC.

I think hate speech laws are as reprehensible as Islam. Suppression of speech is vile no matter what group employs it. Though I commend USC for kicking at the foul nest of snakes in their midst, instead of demanding the removal of the “sacred hadith”, they ought to have publicized it, put a spotlight on it so that all can see what islam espouses. It’s removal only serves to give the MSA more cover, because it will not be removed as a tenet that they subscribe to. They will still utter it in their hearts. But to humiliate them with the reproach and disgust that would attend exposing them would serve to strip them of the credibility they so desperately seek in American society. That is how the KKK and other supremacist groups were made impotent. That is what needs to be done with islamists.

I am far past the time when I would look for “reasonable muslims”. If there were any, they themselves would have shut down groups like MSA. But they remain silent, and their silence condemns them. So be it.

Rudi Giuliani Reminds GOP Who the Enemy Is

2008 Republican National Convention | September 1-4, 2008.

Though Palin’s speech deserves all the accolades being given it, Giuliani said some very important things in his as well. Now I didn’t listen to the whole convention and would have ignored it completely were it not for Palin. So I don’t know if anyone else bothered to directly name the enemy that we face, but, God bless Rudy, he has never forgotten who it is we fight

You would be well served to read the entire transcript at Monkeycrash. I want to focus on this part:

For — for four days in Denver, the Democrats were afraid to use the words “Islamic terrorism.”

I imagine they believe it is politically incorrect to say it. I think they believe it will insult someone. Please tell me, who are they insulting if they say “Islamic terrorism”? They are insulting terrorists.

Of great concern to me, during those same four days in Denver, they rarely mentioned the attacks of September 11, 2001. They are in a state of denial about the biggest threat that faces this country. And if you deny it and you don’t deal with it, you can’t face it.

John McCain can face the enemy. He can win, and he can bring victory for this country.

I have huge misgivings about McCain. His dalliance with the global warming crowd, cap and trade, illegals – all those issues make me very reluctant to vote for him. Indeed, were it not for Palin, I’d likely not even consider it.  But I do believe that McCain will fight our enemy. And our enemies know it too.
That’s why it is so easy to find terrorists that ardently support Obama, including the Iranian islamists whom he is dying to chat with.

From LGF and MEMRI

The totalitarian Islamic regime of Iran is also paying close attention, and of course they’re strongly opposed to John McCain—and strongly in favor of Barack Obama. (Courtesy of MEMRI TV.)

Notice that there’s no discernible difference between the Iranian position and the position of the Democratic Party. The talking points are identical. [ed:my bold]

Click the links above to go to the video. Below is the transcript as reproduced from MEMRI.

Be Prepared to Bow Before Your Islamic Masters (Spit)

Gateway to Hell

For all the secularists and atheists and christo-phobes, become acquainted with the masters you will one day kneel before – if you keep up your incessant support of islam. You will long for the day when all you had to contend with were pushy preachers. This is in England, a country robust with those who despise the Christian god and those who have pushed a multicultural agenda. As they are now finding out, you will soon reap what you have sown in America.

Later this month it’s Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year. It’s one of the holiest days of the Jewish calendar, so I’d be obliged, please, if you’d all stay at home, turn off the TV and refrain from your usual activities. Ten days after that it’s Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, when Jews fast and spend the day in synagogue. So I’ve also asked my Times colleagues not to work then. And I will be mightily offended if I learn afterwards that any of them have been eating.

You might not think I am being serious. But if I was Head of Democratic Services at Tower Hamlets Council in East London, I would be. Last week John Williams e-mailed each of the borough’s 51 councillors with a similar instruction.

For the duration of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month, they are, he told them – every one of them, Muslim, Catholic, Jew or atheist – to behave during council meetings as strict Muslims. They are not to eat or drink; they are to break for Muslim prayers; they are to do as they are ordered by the Muslim religion.
Continue reading…Compulsory fasting for all.

For those yet unfamiliar with the term, this is called “creeping sharia”. It is the insidious incursion of muslims into western societies. The rude and chauvinistic insistence that we honor their “holy” days while they continue to work with the left to eradicate all evidence of any other religion, be it Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism – any of them. And forced observation of their “holy” days will be the least of it.

Quite the contrary to what the insanely misguided Mr. Bush has declared, Islam means “submission”, not peace. There are a multitude of bookmarks under the heading, “Islam Kills: Wake Up America”, to your right. Please, if you still do not get it, peruse them. Your lefty friends will never know you questioned their “all cultures are equal” doctrine.

The Jews Give Us Geniuses, Islam Gives Us Moronic Terrorists

7 Muslim vs. 129 Jewish Nobel Prizes?

The Global Islamic population is approximately 1,200,000,000,

or 20% of the world population.

They have received the following Nobel Prizes:

Literature:

1988 – Najib Mahfooz

Peace:

1978 – Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat

1994 – Yaser Arafat

1990 – Elias James Corey

1999 – Ahmed Zewa

Economics:

(none)

Medicine:>

1960 – Peter Brian Medawar

1998 – Ferid Mourad

TOTAL: SEVEN

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - — – – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000,

or about 0.02% of the world population.

They have received the following Nobel Prizes:

Literature:

1910 – Paul Heyse

1927 – Henri Bergson

1958 – Boris Pasternak

1966 – Shmuel Yosef Agnon

1966 – Nelly Sachs

1976 – Saul Bellow

1978 – Isaac Bashevis Singer

1981 – Elias Canetti

1987 – Joseph Brodsky

1991 – Nadine Gordimer World

Peace:

1911 – Alfred Fried

1911 – Tobias Michael Carel Asser

1968 – Rene Cassin

1973 – Henry Kissinger

1978 – Menachem Begin

1986 – Elie Wiesel

1994 – Shimon Peres

1994 – Yitzhak Rabin

Physics:

1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer

1906 – Henri Moissan

1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson

1908 – Gabriel Lippmann

1910 – Otto Wallach

1915 – Richard Willstaetter

1918 – Fritz Haber

1921 – Albert Einstein

1922 – Niels Bohr

1925 – James Franck

1925 – Gustav Hertz

1943 – Gustav Stern

1943 – George Charles de Hevesy

1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi

1952 – Felix Bloc h

1954 – Max Born

1958 – Igor Tamm

1959 – Emilio Segre

1960 – Donald A. Glaser

Muslims: Malignant Narcissists

The examples of this attitude of Islamic narcissistic entitlement are all around us these days. They demand “respect” for their religion, even as their religion dismisses and denigrates others; they demand that you draw only cartoons they they approve of (even as their own “humor” in cartoons passes the bounds of civilized behavior in terms of sadism and offense). They immigrate to countries that are polite enough to let them in and allow them to practice their religion in peace; and they threaten violence unless those countries are willing to alter their own traditions and subvert their own values in adopting the Islamic perspective.

Let’s face it. These Islamic narcissists don’t want to be tolerated by the society they live in and free to practice their religion even in the most multiculturally sensitive nations; they want the society or nation they live in to completely submit to their values and religious practices and to acknowledge their obvious superiority–or else. (Source)

And Tribal Culture is Equal to Western Culture? I Beg to Differ…

Yes, Islamic culture is so pleasant, replete with traditions that you simply can’t blame the _Amerikkan ReProgressive for defending. Just remember, ReProgressives will tell you that all cultures are equal.

A Pakistani lawmaker defended a decision by northwestern tribesmen to bury five women alive because they wanted to choose their own husbands, telling stunned members of Parliament to spare him their outrage.

“These are centuries-old traditions, and I will continue to defend them,” Israr Ullah Zehri, who represents Baluchistan province, told The Associated Press Saturday.

“Only those who indulge in immoral acts should be afraid.”

The women, three of whom were teenagers, were first shot and then thrown into a ditch.

They were still breathing as mud was shoveled over their bodies, according to media reports, which said their only “crime” was that they wished to marry men of their own choosing.

Zehri told a packed and stunned Parliament on Friday that Baluch tribal traditions helped stop obscenity and then asked fellow lawmakers to stop making such a fuss about it.

Several lawmakers stood up in protest, describing the so-called honor killings as “barbaric.”

Human rights groups accused local authorities of trying to hush up the executions, which according to local media reports and activists took place a month ago in Baba Kot, a remote village in Jafferabad district.

5 buried alive ‘tradition’

The Utter Hypocrisy and Lunacy of the American Feminist

If a prominent Christian were to make a statement somewhat like this…

Christians are often accused of repressed sexuality when criticized for their “puritanical” teachings on the sanctity of marriage. The truth however is that the Christian faith embodies a strongly developed sense of its appropriate channeling – toward marriage, the bonds that sustain family life, and the attachment that secures a home.

…the howls from femi-nazis and progressives would promptly ensue, denigrating the faith for it’s anachronistic and oppressive teachings.

Muslim women

Have you often wondered why feminists make no universal protest over the suppression of women and sexuality in Islam? Well, I have, but, I should have realized that when the facts of honor killings and genital mutilation are input into a Progressive brain, the reframing of it’s meaning would produce the convoluted reasoning that Naomi Wolf, recently espoused.

The West interprets veiling as repression of women and suppression of their sexuality. But when I travelled in Muslim countries and was invited to join a discussion in women-only settings within Muslim homes, I learned that Muslim attitudes toward women’s appearance and sexuality are not rooted in repression, but in a strong sense of public versus private, of what is due to God and what is due to one’s husband. It is not that Islam suppresses sexuality, but that it embodies a strongly developed sense of its appropriate channelling – toward marriage, the bonds that sustain family life, and the attachment that secures a home.(Source)

The hypocrisy and, as LGF describes it, “cognitive dissonance” of the progressive never ceases to amaze. And, just like Obama, God is accorded honor as long as it is the god the Christian left have invented. He serves at their beck and call whenever invoking deity proves useful.

Women are your fields: go, then, into your fields whence you please. (Quran, 2:223)

Update: I found these links in the LGF comments. They are worth visiting.

• Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): Legal Prohibitions Worldwide
• “Honor Killing” is Absolutely Islamic” by Syed Kamran Mirza
• International Campaign Against Honour Killings
  
• Saudi child ‘files for divorce’
  
• The Arab Mind: Part XV
  
• There must be violence against women
  

Eurabia

EURABIA – A Chilling Look at Europe under Islam
via Bare Naked Islam

Do you really want Barack Hussein Obama charting America’s future?