H/T:@crystalyn

Obama's Spreads His Cheeks

I have used this image once before  to refer to Obama’s foreign policy posture, but I didn’t realize how completely and explicitly  he would model  the denigration he intends to inflict upon America.

There isn’t a bone in my body nor an inclination in my soul that would have me bowing to another human being. NONE. NADA. Perhaps because I am an American to my core and Americans do not bow down, God being the only exception.  But our Resident in the former White House is not particularly American and he  most certainly serves other gods than the Christian one he adopted for  political expediency.

Protein Wisdom makes short work of  the Resident’s  “genuinely obsequious-looking bow”.

Giuliani once practically spit in the face of a presumptuous Saudi Prince. Our President? He fucking bowed.

He bowed to religious intolerance.

He bowed to misogyny.

He bowed to anti-semitism.

He bowed to homophobia.

In short, he surrendered our country’s ideals, offering up our principles for sacrifice on the altar of Otherness — behaving much as the Brits’ royal class and the continental elites have long behaved, favoring the sumptuous decadence of flowing robes and exotic scimitars and sweet tea respites to the bustling workaday democracy of capitalist Jews and their “shitty little country.”

Would-be royalty sticks together, I guess. And by bowing before a Saudi Prince, our President — in addition to taking a piss on 200+ years of precedent — has shown himself to be as principled as many of us knew him to be. Which is not principled at all.
From… Yes. But the real question is, did he give him a toy helicopter or a bitchin’ iPod, too?

H/T: Brutal Honesty

H/T:@rednet

I’m not a big fan of Dick Morris, but this information remains the same no matter who says it. I was just writing somewhere else that if we ever get America back, she’ll be like a beautiful woman who has be gang raped by brutes for days on end.

Don’ t you feel it? The horrifying sense of invasion, the unfamiliar sense of vulnerability, the impotency of watching whom and what you love ravaged before your eyes without any means to stop it? Future generations will, if the left doesn’t completely deconstruct the human spirit, look at the election of this Marxist administration with the same horror that we now view the holocaust.

Obama Begins Turnover of USA Sovereignty to International Body

Moving as quickly as he can to gut the USA and then divide its body parts amongst like-minded globalists, the USA’s Supreme Leader Barack Hussein Obama used the G-20 conference to begin his turnover of USA sovereignty to said internationalists and start the move toward a one-world government. Obama has signed off on international legislation—the Financial Stability Board—that would regulate ALL firms, including those within the USA and places them under the responsibility of an international governmental agency.

On FNC’s Greta Van Susteren’s program, author and columnist Dick Morris noted “literally from April 2nd of this year, that is, today, it’s a whole new world of financial regulation in which, essentially, ALL of the U.S. regulatory bodies and ALL U.S. companies are put under international regulation, international supervision. It really amounts to a global economic government.”
[...]
During this same conference, Obama officially announced the reduction in US nuclear weaponry, so that Iran will be more amenable to sitting down to talk with the US. In other words, he’s again announced to the world that the USA is no longer a threat to anyone—let alone terrorists. Never before in our soon to be short-lived history has the United States of America had this sort of a leader who has now announced—in no uncertain terms—that it is his plan and duty to dismantle and destroy the country he represents. He, his administration members and his Congress (with extraordinary assistance from most notably Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd and their friends) have devastated the US economy, are in the process of eliminating the First and Second Amendments—and the entire US Constitution—have ended free enterprise, established his national youth indoctrination—if not police—force (via the GIVE—Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education—Act) and have begun the process of taking over virtually all private companies.
(Source)

Related: G20: Empowering the IMF and World Government

I think Obama should recruit Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva into his cabinet. He is a perfect fit; a cretinous smudge of corrupt flesh , a poverty pimp and a genuine racist. Maybe once Obama completely buries America and assumes his role as king of the world, da Silva can head up the concentration camps.

Kill Whitey

Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on Thursday blamed the global economic crisis on “white people with blue eyes” and said it was wrong that black and indigenous people should pay for white people’s mistakes.

Speaking in Brasília at a joint press conference with Gordon Brown, the UK prime minister, Mr Lula da Silva told reporters: “This crisis was caused by the irrational behaviour of white people with blue eyes, who before the crisis appeared to know everything and now demonstrate that they know nothing.”
He added: “I do not know any black or indigenous bankers so I can only say [it is wrong] that this part of mankind which is victimized more than any other should pay for the crisis.” (Source)

I tell ya what, at this stage of the game I am thinking that the next time we “white folks” have an opportunity to help “people of color” rise up out of the muck, perhaps we ought to think twice about it. It seems that the end results are less than fortuitous. The jealous little pricks are turning on us like rabid dogs.

If you would like to wash the taste of Obama from your mouth and blow out the fog that comes from listening to his damnable Orwellian speak, take a listen to Daniel Hannan, MEP for South East England, as he tells Gordon Brown exactly the type of man he is. If only America had someone who would tell the preening fool presently defiling the former White House the same.

H/T: Twitter/lynj65

H/T: ButAsForMe

Rachel Lucas conducts an interesting informal experiment from her present home in Great Britain. She’s been comparing comments in the English papers on news of the recent Alabama shootings with those regarding the shooting spree that took 15 lives in Germany.
It’s a good read describing the usual density that libtards typically demonstrate about guns on both sides of the ocean. They are like children stamping their feet. Guns are Bad! Bad! Bad! and they simply will not have it any other way. Just as they imagine that they can eradicate poverty, they slap reality about a bit more by contending it’s the guns, not evil men that slay. But you can’t recognize evil if you deny it’s existence. Or, as is actually more the case these days, you can’t deny evil if you are in bed with it.

Dead in Chicago

Seems to me the folks at Huffington’s qualify as evil’s willing bedfellows. Certainly the comments that Rachel excerpts from that tawdry crowd on the Alabama shootings, which echo their British cousin’s snitty droppings, testify to their high stepping ignorance. Must make them dizzy to strut about so imperiously while balancing such bloated, empty heads. Be that as it may, here are a few examples..

Just another NRA success story in a goober red state, not to sound unfeeling here, but this stuff happens far to much in red states with weak gun laws, and faltering economies. When are they going to get it?

and

More horriffic evidence that my proposal for a federal law requiring all gun owners / buyers to pass a psychological fitness component to the application gun ownership. ..

and last, but not least, this gem….

this is considered a rampage killing and without a doubt, the OVERWHELMING majority of similar crimes are committed by angry white men and gun restrictions need to be implemented for them. Not because they are white, but because they seem to have limited conflict resolution skills and guns are their typical answer to most problems.
(Source)

Indeed. White folks, huh? Well, cool, if you are going to break it down like that, I feel free to say without any hesitation, and with a great deal more accuracy, that there must be a hell of alot of angry black folks in Chicago, because in 16 months there have been 508 students shot. And yes, I am asserting these are black on black murders. As they are so fond of saying, if these were white kids, well, you’d have heard about it.

Twenty-five Chicago Public School students have been murdered this year. As shocking as that number is, there is another figure that’s very disturbing as well: the number of students who have been shot in a 16-month period is enough to fill an elementary school – 508 students, according to school officials. CBS station WBBM-TV in Chicago’s Chief Correspondent Jay Levine asks why, and what is being done to stop it.

Think about it. By this time tomorrow, odds are at least one Chicago Public School student will have been shot. By this time next week, there’ll be seven. It’s a staggering, frightening, shameful statistic that judging from the reaction we got, those who could do something aren’t anxious to talk about( Source)

To borrow the vernacular of the Huffpos, I can only conclude that these “...crimes are committed by angry white black men and gun restrictions need to be implemented for them. Not because they are white black, but because they seem to have limited conflict resolution skills and guns are their typical answer to most problems.”

Gee, I wonder how all those dead black kids escaped Obama’s attention. I mean, hey, it was on his watch, in his hometown. Please, would anyone care to tell me why his performance in Chicago wasn’t a sufficient harbinger of how he will run ruin this country?
I guess that is why the Huffpos have to jump on imagined rednecks in Alabama like gorging piranhas landing on a fat woman drowning. It takes a good deal of energy and diversion to ignore 508 dead or wounded black kids back on the home turf of their messiah.